"Is that a memo in your pants or are you just glad to see me?"
| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 07/20/2004 9:02:57 AM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
Formatting, and duplicate. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1174819/posts |
Posted on 07/20/2004 8:43:03 AM PDT by joinedafterattack
Edited on 07/20/2004 9:05:20 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
WASHINGTON — Former President Clinton's national security adviser is under criminal investigation for taking highly classified terrorism documents that should have been turned over to the independent commission probing the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks, FOX News has confirmed. Sandy Berger (search) is under scrutiny by the Justice Department (search) following the disappearance of documents he was reviewing at the National Archives.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
The New York Times: (212) 556-7652
The New York Post: (212) 930-8000
ABC: 212-456-7777
CBS: 212-975-4321
NBC: 212-664-4444
CNN: 404-237-0234
Fox:1-888-369-4762
NY York Daily News (212) 210-NEWS
This has been posted before with fewer exclamation points. And formatting is our friend. Sorry. Need more coffee.
Yea, but it hasn't been posted in ALLCAPS yet, I'll bet.
I have the same problem. Every night when I get home I have to clean out my socks, they're full of faxes, memos, notes, drawings etc. Really irritating.
Berger's treating classified documents like he treated appetizers at a Georgetown party.
Notice it has already been announced,"The decisions of the 9-11 commission are not effected by this MINOR incident, they are FINAL". How can they be final when based upon TAINTED EVIDENCE ?????????????????????????????????
And why do I get that sinking, frustrated feeling that after a short period of hand-wringing and focus, the Republicans will let this one slip away, Berger will receive the typical slap on the wrist condemnation, and no one will follow up on the 'whats, whys, and wheres'. And they'll get away with another travesty, again.
Joe, I thought you were the conscience of the Senate.
Joe must be trying to get back in the good graces of the Dems.
THis is the strangest thing because all of the classified docs were copies. Why would somebody take copies?
Sandy learned all he knows from der Shliekmeister. Wonder if anything he took ended up in the hands of the Red Chinese ?
OK, I've read he put documents his pocket, down his pants and now in his socks... getting this kind of detail incorrect is a perfect opening for the dark side to say, "see the vast right wing conspiracy jumped the gun on the details and blew something out of proportion." Are we being set up here?
How can it be "suspicious"? Berger himself is the one who came forward.
This will become known as "Sock-Gate." Or "BERGER-GATE."
"Is that a memo in your pants or are you just glad to see me?"
Shall I be the first?
Sock-gate
Berger-gate
Docu-gate
Come on and post your best Watergate spin-offs!
Because he was too stupid to realize they were copies?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.