Posted on 07/16/2004 5:55:38 PM PDT by Richard Poe
Edited on 07/20/2004 7:45:11 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
" Astonishingly, 161 representatives -- all Democrats -- voted against Buyer's proposal. The final tally was 243-161. Only 33 Democrats broke with their party to support Buyer's measure."
All 161 should be tried for treason, removed from office for derelection of office (not representing their AMERICAN constituents).
My disgust for the leftists and the 'Rat party grows by leaps and bounds on a daily basis.
Blessings, Bobo
Thanks for the ping!
"How dare the NPA publish the private contact info of their opponents. How dare they show up at their opponents' private residences and actually trespass on those properties.
I don't disagree with anything you said, but I think you need to reconsider your phraseology. "How dare they..." sounds an awful lot like a way out loon of a former VP!
"Curiously, Hillary Clinton told the New York Post’s Cindy Adams on March 30 that an October Surprise would likely decide the 2004 election. "It will be outside forces – something unforeseen that suddenly happens – that tilts the election one way or the other," she predicted, with an odd note of certainty. (28)"
This scares me more than anything else they can do. Not having her speak, then through the behind-the-scenes-powers-that-be have her introducing Billy Boy. She is dangerous.
This is truly an evil and self-absorbed man...
We are in a propaganda war with these idiots and they are not happy about being challenged on it.
Beware, let no man deceive you!
MUST READ PING
Ping to #20
soros = blofeld
BUMPING FOR LATER READ . .
That was Noam Chomsky
A nutcase radical Commie that sez the USA is a facist invader and thief and baby-bombing killer nation
All this from Noam Chomsky as he enjoys the freedoms and liberties and protection guaranteed only by our US military
That stupid girl's father is a lying Socialist
First thing he did was say "I'm non-partisan and an Independent voter".
Seminar garbage.
He has voted left wing period.
"Non-judgemental"
"Look at both sides...." he said!
Did his daughter want to look at "both sides" with Sean Hannity?
Note the girl's name:
"Mikala"
Gorbi?
Don't waste valuable airtime with these assholes--you aren't going to change them.
As Holmes said, "Probe him where you will he is false."
They took up 45 minutes today and thirty yesterday--not too shabby.
Rush would have given them 2-5 minutes and the listeners would have known they were radical nutcases.
The girl lied today denying she said certain things yesterday.
On Sean's taped playback she and her father still denied her statements, sayning Sean hurried, harrassed, and twisted her statements.
Sounded like apologists for WWII NAZIS and the Japanese to me!
Tossed around the fascist label, then said it was only "the USA government" she said.
Send these two creeps to Cuba.
Sean is naive about many things and not the most astute and often quite a "social" appeaser.
Check out his statements on illegal aliens.
Check out his own hiring policies as a contractor years back.
Clinton and GW both had people disqualified for cabinet level posts because of the same thing, but on a much smaller scale than Sean did as a professional contractor.
SS, INS, and IRS records would doom Sean for any cabinet position and probably any elected national office too.
"Was it a good thing that we took out the Nazis?"
"I don't know. It's not black and white."
When she said that, he should have pulled the trap door.
Sean thinks he will "Hannitize" people.
After getting angry calls and emails he insisted he had to devote time to the calls from Mikayla and Daddy Jerry because it was "so important".
He has no historical perspective to know the New Soviet Man is an old concept, that Eric Hoffer's True Believer is an antique.
His man on the street homosexual ballet boys yesterday did not know who we fought to win our independence.
They were 17 and 23 respectively--enough with the spending on "education" already.
And enough with derailing the second most popular conservative radio talk show to accomodate lying leftists.
Oh and "Jerry" tried to disqualify Sean from commenting as Sean "hadn't raised a teenager".
Hey, Jerry, that's two of you.
According to Kerry and Terry Mc and the Kerry backers Jerry cannot discuss wars or the military either.
He never served......
Kerry spent less time in a combat area than a raw recruit spends in basic and advanced.
Great, great stuff as always. Thankyou, Richard!
Excellent point. As I've been preaching on this forum, the Balkanization of American politics ----dividing Americans into "hyphenates" -----is detrimental to democracy.
These "hyphenates" bring "tribal" culture to the political table that is a distraction to the concept of one nation democracy, and is redolent with the whiff of anti-Americanism.
In the divide and conquer process, politicians segregate hyphenates, creating voting blocs. The politicians promise hyphenates the moon and the stars and do it on our dime.
American taxpayers are not only burdened with supporting these hyphenated "tribes" but have to contend with watching the very foundations of our republic weakened in the process.
Internationalist Soros should get out of the business of American politics and leave it to "we, the preople," where it belongs.
Well, I agree with you on the first accusation in this article---the one about the dems running into the arms of the UN. It does not show how Soros is linked to it.
Dear Vision Thing:
You raise a good question.
What reason can I offer for evoking the name of George Soros in connection with the 161 Democrat Congressmen who voted Thursday to leave the door open for UN intervention in our election?
You rightly observe that I have no smoking gun -- no tell-tale memo, for instance, bearing Soros' signature, ordering Democrats to vote on this measure.
In all likelihood, no such memo exists. And even if it did, the mass media would explain it away as glibly as they did Senator Rockefeller's equally damning memo. How then can we assess the possibility that Mr. Soros may or may not have played a role in Thursday's outrage?
Allow me to explain. I hold Soros responsible for two reasons:
Reason #1: Soros has become de facto leader of the Democrat Party, by virtue of his lavish campaign spending. Organizational science teaches us that institutions take on the character of their leaders. Moreover, the ethics of leadership hold any leader morally and practically responsible for the actions of his subordinates. Period.
Before our eyes, the Democrat Party has acquired a markedly more radical character than it has shown in past years. This change has coincided precisely with Soros' ascension to the status of unofficial party leader.
The fact that 161 Democrat Congressmen voted in favor of UN intervention is a singular event, of enormous magnitude -- a move that Democrat lawmakers would have been unlikely to make without high-level sanction. Who in today's Democrat Party has the authority to approve such a move? Ted Kennedy? Terry McAuliffe? Harold Ickes? Tom Daschle? Hillary Clinton? I think not.
Only Soros wields such authority now. He is the boss -- the man with the plan. For that reason, it is more than reasonable to at least consider the possibility that Thursday's vote bore his stamp of approval.
Reason #2: More importantly, Soros has stated on several occasions that he intends to effect "regime change" in the USA, using similar tactics to those which have proved successful for him in other countries. I recommend that you study the methods Soros has used overseas. He seldom deviates from his playbook.
Sevry's soothing reassurances notwithstanding, the fact remains that whenever Mr. Soros engages in political struggle, he never -- I repeat, never -- limits his activity to such ineffectual gestures as purchasing airtime for candidates or underwriting talkfests such as the Democratic Convention. Mr. Soros plays hardball, and he plays for keeps.
In his arrogance, Mr. Soros has taken few pains to conceal his intentions regarding our upcoming election. Perhaps he considers discretion unnecessary among a people as trusting and unused to Machiavellian intrigue as Americans. Perhaps he believes that we are too innocent to understand him, too complacent to stop him, no matter how openly he states his intentions.
Perhaps Mr. Soros believes that we will simply freeze like the proverbial deer in the headlights when he makes his move, unable to believe or comprehend the enormity of his usurpations.
God grant that Mr. Soros is wrong. God grant that, for all our indolence and luxury, some tiny spark still burns in our bellies from the fires of 1776.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.