Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Air Marshals Say Dress Code Makes Them Stick Out
The NY Times ^ | 071504 | By BRIAN WINGFIELD

Posted on 07/15/2004 1:34:41 PM PDT by Archangelsk

WASHINGTON, July 15 — Beards are out. So are jeans and athletic shoes. Suit coats are in, even on the steamiest summer days.

That dress code, imposed by the Department of Homeland Security, makes federal air marshals uneasy — and not just because casual clothes are more comfortable in cramped airline seats. The marshals fear that their appearance makes it easier for terrorists to identify them, according to a professional group representing more than 1,300 air marshals.

"If a 12-year-old can pick them out, a trained terrorist has no problem picking them out," said John D. Amat, a spokesman for the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association.

Documents and memos issued by the Department of Homeland Security and field offices of the Federal Air Marshal Service say marshals must "present a professional image" and "blend unnoticed into their environment." Some air marshals have argued that the two requirements are contradictory.

Federal air marshals must have neatly trimmed hair, and men must be clean-shaven, the documents say. Some of the service's 21 field offices have mandated that male officers wear suits, ties and dress shoes while on duty, even in summer heat. Women are required to wear blouses and skirts or dress slacks. Jeans, athletic shoes and non-collared shirts are prohibited.

In April, the officers' group sent a letter to members of Congress saying that the "military-style grooming standards and a blanket `sports coat' dress policy," along with conspicuous boarding procedures, jeopardize the safety of federal air marshals.

At least two airline industry unions, the Allied Pilots Association and the Association of Flight Attendants, have publicly backed the assertions of the officers' group.

Lynn Becker, a spokeswoman for Senator Herb Kohl, Democrat of Wisconsin, said the senator was made aware of the issue after a reporter for the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel contacted his office after spotting several air marshals in the Milwaukee airport. The spokeswoman said the senator was working with the director of the Federal Air Marshal Service, Thomas D. Quinn, to address the boarding procedures and dress code issues.

Since May, the Federal Air Marshal Service has changed the check-in procedure for its air marshals, no longer requiring them to sign a logbook when they board. According to Senator Kohl's office, the air marshals' service is also considering a waiver that would allows its officers to request a relaxation of the dress code for certain flights.

The Federal Air Marshal Service acknowledges that a dress code for its marshals does exist, but it will not elaborate, saying that the specifics are "security sensitive information."

Dave Adams, a spokesman for the service, said that groups who have publicized the dress code are "endangering the lives of our general workforce." Mr. Adams said a dress code was put in place in April 2002, after the airline industry complained that air marshals' attire was too casual. He said some marshals had worn shorts, blue jeans, sandals and T-shirts while on duty.

"In order to gain respect in a situation, you must be attired to gain respect," Mr. Adams said in an interview. If air marshals were allowed to be too casual in their dress, he added, "they probably would not gain the respect of passengers if a situation were to occur."

One air marshal, who said he is frequently spotted by passengers, and who spoke on condition of anonymity, said, "Professionalism isn't deemed by your dress; it's by your attitude and demeanor.

"We just want the opportunity to dress different every day," he added.

He said the current dress policy allows potential terrorists to identify federal air marshals on flights. "They'll just pick out what flights we're on and what flights we're not on," he said.

Andrea Houck, 52, who was traveling through New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport to visit her son in San Diego this week, said that she thought federal air marshals should be "totally undercover."

Ms. Houck, pointing to other passengers waiting in the terminal's food court, said: "Look around you. Most people are traveling in T-shirts, sweatshirts and khakis.

"If I was a terrorist and I spotted someone dressed like an air marshal in a suit, I wouldn't get on that flight. I would get on another one."

Jason Pesick contributed reporting from Washington, and Eddy Ramírez from New York.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: airlines; airlinesecurity; airmarshals; dresscode; marshals; pax; slobs; tsa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
Here's a simple solution, mandatory suit and ties for all male passengers, mandatory dress or pants suits for female passengers, children appropriately attired. In order to make this work, all airlines must participate in the dress code policy and the airlines have the right to refuse boarding to any passenger who doesn't comply with the code (they would also forfeit the money they paid).

If the TSA grunts want to be slobs let them go play with dope dealers and see how much they like that action. As for the occasional fat, drunk, slob passengers who may show up, tough teet, our national airspace, our rules. Hit the pavement if you don't like it.

1 posted on 07/15/2004 1:34:44 PM PDT by Archangelsk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Archangelsk

Nothing like uniformed undercover cops.


2 posted on 07/15/2004 1:38:50 PM PDT by js1138 (In a minute there is time, for decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse. J Forbes Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Archangelsk

ALL YOUR AIR MARSHALLS ARE BELONG TO US!!!


3 posted on 07/15/2004 1:41:18 PM PDT by Zavien Doombringer (If a Democrat falls from office and nobody is around will they make a sound?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Archangelsk

You must blend in and you should note SFers, facial growth/hair in abundance and blending into the local populace to not stand out. The Air Marshals should be allowed the same right as we are at War with Terrorism right this hour.


4 posted on 07/15/2004 1:41:46 PM PDT by CPC (HHC OJF the Pocket - Banja Luka--Brcko AO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Archangelsk
?
5 posted on 07/15/2004 1:42:20 PM PDT by traumer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Archangelsk

If I ever travel by air again I am wearing a suit. Might keep the muslims under control.


6 posted on 07/15/2004 1:43:35 PM PDT by CzarNicky (The problem with bad ideas is that they seemed like good ideas at the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CPC; Criminal Number 18F
You must blend in and you should note SFers, facial growth/hair in abundance and blending into the local populace to not stand out.

Bwahahaha. Criminal, you want to 'splain what happened in the Stans.

7 posted on 07/15/2004 1:44:00 PM PDT by Archangelsk (15 out of 19. The House of Saud must be driven into the desert.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Archangelsk

Tank tops for all males. Then you can see who shaved their body the night before.

If you're an airline employee flying on a pass, you're required to abide by the dress code, but I see them breaking it all the time.


8 posted on 07/15/2004 1:44:11 PM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Archangelsk

Blend in, why stick out and become a target? The bad guy has you zeroed and you are good as dead if they are easily identifiable. Besides, I do not care for "Stans".


9 posted on 07/15/2004 1:46:52 PM PDT by CPC (HHC OJF the Pocket - Banja Luka--Brcko AO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Archangelsk
If the TSA grunts want to be slobs let them go play with dope dealers and see how much they like that action

Ya... everyone knows that being well dressed is more important than doing a good job.

10 posted on 07/15/2004 1:46:56 PM PDT by bikepacker67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CzarNicky

great idea! Me too!


11 posted on 07/15/2004 1:47:04 PM PDT by Frapster (Not with the wisdom of man's words but through the demonstration of power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican; Archangelsk
Tank tops for all males. Then you can see who shaved their body the night before.

That'd keep Gary Condit off most planes.

12 posted on 07/15/2004 1:47:38 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (uDo not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CzarNicky

go ahead and end up being the nearly the first one to be murdered, hero.


13 posted on 07/15/2004 1:50:46 PM PDT by CPC (HHC OJF the Pocket - Banja Luka--Brcko AO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Archangelsk
"Dress Code Makes Them Stick Out... "
14 posted on 07/15/2004 1:51:22 PM PDT by traumer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Archangelsk
Here's a simple solution, mandatory suit and ties for all male passengers, mandatory dress or pants suits for female passengers, children appropriately attired. In order to make this work, all airlines must participate in the dress code policy and the airlines have the right to refuse boarding to any passenger who doesn't comply with the code (they would also forfeit the money they paid).

No, that is an idiotic solution.

Hardly anyone dresses up to fly, except businesspeople who are en route to a meeting.

Why shouldn't they blend in and where the typical air traveller clothing, which is casual? Of course, a government agency doing anything remotely intelligent is asking a bit much.

15 posted on 07/15/2004 1:52:29 PM PDT by Bella_Bru (It's for the children = It takes a village)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Archangelsk

Don't most marshals sit up front, ie, in business class? And people are wearing sweatsuits and tanktops in business class? Yikes.


16 posted on 07/15/2004 1:53:00 PM PDT by laurav
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Archangelsk
Did you ever think the TSA agents might also want to wear clothes that give them some freedom of movement? A suit is hardly what you wear to a fight. Further, a tie can be used to choke the agent. How about instead of inconveniencing everyone, the government actually use some common sense.
17 posted on 07/15/2004 1:53:00 PM PDT by asmith92008 (If we buy into the nonsense that we always have to vote for RINOs, we'll just end up taking the horn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Archangelsk

18 posted on 07/15/2004 1:54:49 PM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Archangelsk

"Beards are out. So are jeans and athletic shoes.... "

But WHY ?? Isn't it basically an undercover operation ?
Aren't they suppose to blend in ?
Who sets these silly rules ?


19 posted on 07/15/2004 1:55:12 PM PDT by traumer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Too subtle?


20 posted on 07/15/2004 1:55:59 PM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson