Skip to comments.U.K. Report: Zarqawi Set Up Sleeper Cells
Posted on 07/15/2004 6:26:29 AM PDT by TexKat
LONDON - Jordanian militant Abu Musab al-Zarqawi set up "sleeper cells" in Baghdad before the Iraq war to attack American forces occupying the country, according to a British intelligence report.
The report, dated March 2003 and released as part of an overall review of British intelligence, forecast the string of Zarqawi's attacks against American targets during the past year "using car bombs and other weapons." It said he was setting up groups of fighters to be activated at a later time, known in the intelligence field as "sleeper cells."
Prime Minister Tony Blair claimed vindication Wednesday after a committee led by Lord Butler released its report that concluded British intelligence on Iraqi weapons of mass destruction was flawed, but said the government had not deliberately deceived anyone as it built a case for toppling Saddam Hussein.
While Butler's report faulted British intelligence for having few reliable sources and not properly analyzing information, it did credit the spies with foreseeing the al-Zarqawi strikes on coalition forces.
By the time of the U.S.-led invasion in March of last year, the report said, Britain's Joint Intelligence Committee indicated:
"Reporting since (February) suggests that senior al-Qaida associate Abu Musab al-Zarqawi has established sleeper cells in Baghdad, to be activated during a U.S. occupation of the city."
The reported added: "These cells apparently intend to attack U.S. targets using car bombs and other weapons. (It is also possible that they have received CB materials from terrorists in the KAZ)," referring to chemical and biological materials and the Kurdish Autonomous Zone. "Al-Qaida-associated terrorists continued to arrive in Baghdad in early March."
Ousted President Saddam Hussein didn't have any control over the Kurdish zone in northern Iraq. And British analysts believed there was no active cooperation between Saddam and al-Qaida, Butler's report said.
In October 2002, the a British intelligence report said: "Although Saddam's attitude to al-Qaida has not always been consistent, he has generally rejected suggestions of cooperation. Intelligence nonetheless indicates that ... meetings have taken place between senior Iraqi representatives and senior al-Qaida operatives.
The Butler report also said there was no evidence to back up suggestions Iraq may have trained some al-Qaida terrorists since 1998.
"Al-Qaida has shown interest in gaining chemical and biological (CB) expertise from Iraq, but we do not know whether any such training was provided," the report said. "We have no intelligence of current cooperation between Iraq and al-Qaida and do not believe that al-Qaida plans to conduct terrorist attacks under Iraqi direction."
Much of Butler's report concentrated on a dossier published by Blair's government in September 2002, which laid out a case that Iraq had chemical and biological weapons, and plans to use them; and that Iraq was seeking to develop nuclear weapons.
On Wednesday, Blair acknowledged Butler's conclusion that Iraq did not have significant if any stocks of chemical or biological weapons ready for deployment, or plans for using them.
But he said the report confirmed his government had acted in good faith.
"No one lied. No one made up the intelligence," Blair told the House of Commons.
"Everyone genuinely tried to do their best in good faith for the country in circumstances of acute difficulty. That issue of good faith should now be at an end."
However, Conservative Party leader Michael Howard accused Blair of taking patchy intelligence on Iraqi WMD and hardening it into fact.
"I hope we will not face in this country another war in the foreseeable future. But if we did and you identified the threat, would the country believe you?" Howard said.
Public faith in Blair and his governing Labour Party were being tested in two special elections Thursday prompted by the death of one Labour lawmaker and the resignation of another.
Both are normally considered "safe" seats for Labour, which won both by landslides in 2001 and holds 159 more seats than the combined opposition in the House of Commons. Labour and the Conservatives, who also backed the war, have campaigned on domestic issues such as crime, education and health care.
The Liberal Democrats, the only major party to oppose the Iraq invasion, have run on a strong anti-war platform in the Leicester South and Birmingham Hodge Hill districts, which both have large Muslim populations.
Liberal Democrat leader Charles Kennedy said Wednesday he doubted the House of Commons would have backed the war if it had "known then what it knows today about the state of Saddam Hussein's weapons."
Robin Cook, who resigned from Blair's Cabinet in protest against the war, said the Butler report should rule out another "pre-emptive" war.
"The pre-emptive strike against a threat that may exist in the future requires very good intelligence and what we now know is that you never get intelligence that reliable," Cook said in a British Broadcasting Corp. radio interview Thursday.
But Clinton just said yesterday that the terrorists never showed any interest in obtaining WMD. Bah! What a POS he is.
I missed that ....are they "nice" terrorists?
"You can say you think Blair made a mistake but it's not the same thing as . . . we did in America." Mr Clinton was sharply critical of the US government for seeking to link Mr Hussein with al-Qaeda, adding that the terrorist network did not really care about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction.
So was Sadaam's Police apparatus totally unaware of this as well as being snookered by those wacky Iraqi scientists about WMDs?
Wait until the left tries to claim that we forced poor old Saddam into the arms of the terrorists by threatening to attack him (for absolutely no reason, don't you know!).
If some smart reporter (if there are any such things) did an article about Abu Musab al-Zarqawi's dominance over Bin Laden who happens to be hiding out in a cave, it might cause some internal conflict within in the terrorist ranks.
You know what big egos these freaks have. Maybe Bin Laden would have al-Zarqawi "eliminated."
I was right..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.