[concerned about politics]

We'll find out soon enough who voted for pushing dysfunctional sex fetishes and who voted for the American family and their children.
We'll know who was anti-family within 24 hours. The Republicans voting for all fetish marriage will pay for this. All the foot licker's, boy molesters, polygamists, animal chasers and tree humpers will be getting in line. What's Constitutional for one demented fetish is constitutional for all, and these Republicans will be the ones to blame for not stopping it.

[hunter112]

The Republicans voting for all fetish marriage will pay for this.

Nope. There's a reason that RINOs exist, and that is because the alternative is much worse. How many of us wouldn't replace Hillary Clinton with a RINO? All she does for us is provide a scary face when we need to raise money.

Here in WA, I'd love to see our two Rat senators replaced with RINOs. In order to get elected, and to stay elected, the RINOs would have to oppose the FMA. But they'd be valuable when it comes to approving President Bush's judicial nominees, or at least ensuring that important committee chairmanships stay in the hands of people from the more conservative states.

Anyone who is genuinely disappointed about the turnout of today's vote was living in a fantasy world, if they thought that there would be 67 votes for an FMA.

[HungarianGypsy]

Didn't expect a different vote from McPain in Arizona. The man is rarely in Arizona unless he's playing professional politician and kissing up to the "if it doesn't effect me directly" crowd. Would love to have him out of office, but no one has run against him. Am happy to have Jon Kyl as a senator, though. At least he listens to the people he represents.