To: reagandemo
"If Gays want civil unions fine no problem."
Not under FMA - it is not "no problem." What exactly do you think "legal incidents" means?
250 posted on
07/12/2004 12:35:17 PM PDT by
lugsoul
(Until at last I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside.)
To: lugsoul
Depends on what Judge is looking at it. I mean we all know that "is" can mean many things. I do not trust my freedom to activist judges who legislate from the bench. Our freedoms and the values which this country has been founded on are continually eroded by Liberal "I know what's best for you" Judges. This is why we have amendments to the constitution. This is why we must draw the line. And since you brought up the Federalist Papers remember what they said about activist Judges.
260 posted on
07/12/2004 12:40:02 PM PDT by
reagandemo
(The battle is near are you ready for the sacrifice?)
To: lugsoul
"Legal incidents." Effects that are not marriage. A civil union or domestic partnership is NOT a marriage. Its a different form of social relationship in the eyes of the law and so does not have the name or the status of marriage for the purposes of benefits and court proceedings.
270 posted on
07/12/2004 12:49:58 PM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson