Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ArGee

Do I understand you to say then, that marriage has been (continually) re-defined since the 60's? If so, how has it been "re-defined as opposed to modified?


153 posted on 06/23/2004 12:17:24 PM PDT by olorin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]


To: olorin
Do I understand you to say then, that marriage has been (continually) re-defined since the 60's? If so, how has it been "re-defined as opposed to modified?

Marriage was to have been one-man and one-woman for a lifetime except for extenuating circumstances. It was also to have been the reasonable and appropriate realm of sexual relations.

Since the '60s we have dumped marriage as the reasonable and appropriate realm of sexual relations. Sex is separated from marriage now.

Then we dumped the lifetime. Serial monogamy might be preferred by some, but lifetime monogamy came under attack. Marriage is for the moment now.

We are in the process of dumping the "man and woman" part.

Expect the exclusivity arrangement to fall next. Don't even get me started on interspecial marriage.

Shalom.

158 posted on 06/23/2004 12:46:52 PM PDT by ArGee (After 517, the abolition of man is complete)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson