To: swilhelm73
Where'd they conduct this 'poll'? Anacostia?

2 posted on
06/22/2004 4:31:03 PM PDT by
Viking2002
(Liberals are social terrorists and seditionists. Treat them as such.........)
To: swilhelm73
The American Liberal press has taken over the function that, in World War II, used to be performed by Joseph Goebbels'
Reichspropagandaministerium.:
Namely, to present the American war effort in the worst posible light and thereby attempt to demoralize the American Home Front while energizing America's enemy.
3 posted on
06/22/2004 4:41:08 PM PDT by
Polybius
To: swilhelm73
Here's my first question: do the people surveyed have any idea what John Kerry would do to protect us better?That's a good question, but you're making an assumption that everyone that doesn't like the WOT progress won't vote for Bush. Take a look around this forum--have you noticed that the 'Nuke 'Em!' crowd is out if force (again)? Every problem is best solved with a thermo-nuclear device of some sort (the bigger the better). How do you think they'd answer the question, "Are you pleased with Bush's performance on the WOT?" They'd probably answer 'no', but that doesn't mean they aren't going to vote for Bush.
4 posted on
06/22/2004 4:42:45 PM PDT by
randog
(Everything works great 'til the current flows.)
To: swilhelm73
Why respond to Goebbels type propaganda. The Washington comPost proves only that Pravda type media is here in the US.
5 posted on
06/22/2004 4:46:50 PM PDT by
OldFriend
(IF YOU CAN READ THIS, THANK A TEACHER.......AND SINCE IT'S IN ENGLISH, THANK A SOLDIER)
To: swilhelm73
Brit Hume exposed the ridiculous nature of this "poll" tonight. He mentioned three questions:
1. Who do you trust to do a better job handling THE US CAMPAIGN AGAINST TERRORISM, George W. Bush or John Kerry?
Bush 47%
Kerry 48%
2. Do you think John Kerry does or does not have a clear plan for: handling terrorism?
Does 42%
Does not 53%
3. Please tell me whether the following statement applies more to George W. Bush or more to John Kerry: He will make the country safer and more secure.
Bush 54%
Kerry 40%
Now, I ask you: Just how reliable is this poll?
And yet, what was the headline on the Washington Post story?:
Bush Loses Advantage in War on Terrorism
7 posted on
06/22/2004 5:00:43 PM PDT by
jackbill
To: swilhelm73
Liberals live, and die, by the polls.
I agree that the Abu prison incident was a very stupid thing to do...then, I see pictures of Berg and Johnson with their heads separated from their bodies...and I think, "I'd rather been stacked up naked, and be decapitated". The bunch in the naked pyramid were not jaywalkers...they were in there for good reason. Berg and Johnson were killed for insignificant reasons, i.e. being Jewish, or, having a job working on helicopters.
I was watching a documentary on History channel the other night and they showed where the U.S. captured a Nazi submarine in WWII. They rescued the Nazi soldiers before the sub sank; they proceeded to strip the Nazis down, and put them on a platform on the side of the ship, and hose them down.
Now, admittedly, that was for hygiene, but if that had happened in today's world - with the liberal press' obsession with sex and perversion, it would have been made into the same thing as Abu.
I like to believe that most of the people who are supporting Bush do not hold him accountable for Abu. These were a few adolescent soldiers, doing something they knew was wrong, but did it anyway because no one was looking...just like kids. Their trials are being played out in the press, and of course, the lawyers - who are probably democrats - are going to try and shove it up the line to Bush.
I believe that anyone who was going to vote for Bush anyway, has not been swayed by this obvious witch hunt. The recognize it for what it is, and we should borrow a well-known phrase from the late, great, President Reagan..."...there you go again..."
8 posted on
06/22/2004 5:02:20 PM PDT by
FrankR
(Don't let the bastards wear you down...)
To: swilhelm73
Bulletin: Bush, Cheney, entire Cabinet declare themselves Democrats - Press struck speechless since they can't/won't bash the home team; media outlets all fold due to lack of anything to bash...
10 posted on
06/22/2004 5:17:30 PM PDT by
Thom Pain
(Quisling - from Vidkun Quisling (1887-1945), a synonym for "traitor")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson