Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: counterpunch
I think it is quite logical to deduce that "available, stricter limits" is just as divided as the two extremes are. You, however, are living in la-la land if you believe everyone who gave this answer meant only giving exceptions for rape and incest.

I freely admit I don't know what it means - hence the reason I asked six times for a definition. You're the only interpreting the poll to suit your views. I already stated it isn't worth its own bandwidth until we find out what "stricter limits" are.

Nice attempt at putting words in my mouth, but you'll need to do better than that.

305 posted on 06/20/2004 1:18:41 PM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies ]


To: NittanyLion
You're the only interpreting the poll to suit your views.

No, I am interpriting the poll using standard statistical diffusion and interpolation.
You are trying to interprit it as monolithic, which is statistically improbable to the point of exclusion.
306 posted on 06/20/2004 1:23:27 PM PDT by counterpunch (The CouNTeRPuNcH Collection - www.freepgs.com/counterpunch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson