Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/07/2004 4:40:44 PM PDT by swilhelm73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: swilhelm73

During the dot com boom under Xlinton liberals weren't whining about "greed" then.


2 posted on 06/07/2004 4:42:33 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Extremer than any Extremist!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: swilhelm73
Bill Schneider has been very wrong now for at least two decades. Doesn't seem to put a dent in CNN's reliance on him to tell the rest of us what time it is.

My favorite instance of Schneider stepping in it was a cover piece he had in The Atlantic Monthly - which was out just before the 1992 Election - entitled "the Suburban Century" or something similar. It pointed out the suburban migration pattern had led to a preponderance of Republican dominated counties - which would lead to Republican Presidential victories from 1992 on out

Ooops!

Of course none of what followed - two terms of Bill Clinton - would ever lead The Atlantic Monthly or CNN or anyone who hires Schneider to issue a disclaimer. He's the kind of "expert" they like.

4 posted on 06/07/2004 4:52:26 PM PDT by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: swilhelm73; Admin Moderator
swilhelm73, I think this says it all too well.

AM: Hope I'm not violating any posting/reply rule by entering this from the Palm Beach Post.


7 posted on 06/07/2004 5:18:48 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: swilhelm73

Not that I believe there's a conspiracy, but I think the media and Dems are taking this oppurtunity to "act" as if they always cared about Reagan and that all this recent division is product of Republican mean-spiritedness. I've already seen Woodruff comment on how things seemed so much more civil back in the old days...as she was interviewing Dan Rostankowski, who agreed. This, as with all things liberal, is more revisionsim.


8 posted on 06/07/2004 5:55:47 PM PDT by cwb (If it weren't for Republicans, liberals would have no real enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: swilhelm73

Hell, I was there. The liberal media HATED Reagan with a passion and used every opportunity to bash him. RWR's policies and gentlemanly manner sent the Left into convulsions. The same bunch of pinko losers (like J. F'n Kerry) supported the communist thugs in Nicaragua right in the middle of the Cold War. Reagan's margin of support in Congress for his policies was sometimes very slim. The liberals that hide their true feelings and politics now were much more open back then.


10 posted on 06/07/2004 6:53:21 PM PDT by darth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: swilhelm73

While its nice some are documenting the history of liberals and their various inaccurate pronouncements, the fact is liberalism hasn't come up with a new idea in over five decades.

Liberalism as a political belief is in effect bankrupt, having been so thoroughly discredited liberals have been forced to change their own self definition to "progressives" or "moderates".


13 posted on 07/01/2004 9:36:56 AM PDT by Badeye ("The day you stop learning, is the day you begin dying")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson