Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ann Coulter - Tit for Tet
townhall.com ^ | 5/27/04

Posted on 05/26/2004 11:59:17 PM PDT by kattracks

Abu Ghraib is the new Tet offensive. By lying about the Tet offensive during the Vietnam War, the media managed to persuade Americans we were losing the war, which demoralized the nation and caused us to lose the war. And people say reporters are lazy.

The immediate consequence of the media's lies was a 25 percent drop in support for the war. The long-term consequence for America was 12 years in the desert until Ronald Reagan came in and saved the country.

Now liberals are using their control of the media to persuade the public that we are losing the war in Iraq. Communist dictators may have been ruthless murderers bent on world domination, but they displayed a certain degree of rationality. America may not be able to wait out 12 years of Democrat pusillanimity now that we're dealing with Islamic lunatics who slaughter civilians in suicide missions while chanting "Allah Akbar!"

And yet the constant drumbeat of failure, quagmire, Abu Ghraib, Bush-lied-kids-died has been so successful that merely to say the war in Iraq is going well provokes laughter. The distortions have become so pervasive that Michael Moore teeters on the brink of being considered a reliable source.

If President Bush mentions our many successes in Iraq, it is evidence that he is being "unrealistically sunny and optimistic," as Michael O'Hanlon of the liberal Brookings Institution put it.

O'Hanlon's searing indictment of the operation in Iraq is that we need to "make sure they have some budget resources that they themselves decide how to spend that are not already pre-allocated." So that's the crux of our challenge in Iraq: Make sure their "accounts receivable" columns all add up. Whenever great matters are at stake, you can always count on liberals to have some pointless, womanly complaint.

We have liberated the Iraqi people from a brutal dictator who gassed his own people, had weapons of mass destruction, invaded his neighbors, harbored terrorists, funded terrorists and had reached out to Osama bin Laden. Liberals may see Saddam's mass graves in Iraq as half-full, but I prefer to see them as half-empty.

So far, we have found chemical and biological weapons – brucella and Congo-Crimean hemorrhagic fever, ricin, sarin, aflatoxin – and long-range missiles in Iraq.

The terrorist "stronghold" of Karbala was abandoned last week by Islamic crazies loyal to cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, who slunk away when it became clear that no one supported them. Iraqis living in Karbala had recently distributed fliers asking the rebels to please leave, further underscoring one of the principal remaining problems in Iraq – the desperate need for more Kinko's outlets. Last weekend, our troops patrolled this rebel "stronghold" without a shot being fired.

The entire Kurdish region – one-third of the country – is patrolled by about 300 American troops, which is fewer than it takes to patrol the Kennedy compound in Palm Beach on Easter weekends.

But the media tell us this means we're losing. The goalpost of success keeps shifting as we stack up a string of victories. Before the war, New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof warned that war with Iraq would be a nightmare: "[W]e won't kill Saddam, trigger a coup or wipe out his Republican Guard forces." (Unless, he weaseled his way out, "we're incredibly lucky.")

We've done all that! How incredibly lucky.

Kristof continued: "We'll have to hunt out Saddam on the ground – which may be just as hard as finding Osama in Afghanistan, and much bloodier."

We've captured Saddam! And it wasn't bloody! Indeed, the most harrowing aspect of Saddam's capture was that he hadn't bathed or been de-liced for two months.

Kristof also said: "Our last experience with street-to-street fighting was confronting untrained thugs in Mogadishu, Somalia. This time we're taking on an army with possible bio- and chemical weapons, 400,000 regular army troops and supposedly 7 million more in Al Quds militia."

And yet, somehow, our boys defeated them in just six weeks! Incredibly lucky again! And just think: all of this accomplished without even having a "Plan."

Now we're fighting directly with Islamic loonies crawling out of their rat holes from around the entire region – which liberals also said wouldn't happen. Remember how liberals said the Islamic loonies hated Saddam Hussein – hated him! – because he was a "secularist"? As geopolitical strategist Paul Begala put it, Saddam would never share his weapons with terrorists because "those Islamic terrorists would use them against Saddam Hussein because he's secular."

Well, apparently, the crazies have put aside their scruples about Saddam's secularism to come out in the open where they can be shot by American troops rather than fighting on the streets of Manhattan (where the natives would immediately surrender).

The beauty of being a liberal is that history always begins this morning. Every day liberals can create a new narrative that destroys the past as it occurred. We have always been at war with Eastasia.

To be sure, Iraq is not a bed of roses. As the Brookings Institution scholar said, we have yet to give the Iraqis "budget resources" that "are not already pre-allocated." I take it back: It is a quagmire.

Ann Coulter is host of AnnCoulter.org, a Townhall.com member group.

©2004 Universal Press Syndicate

Contact Ann Coulter | Read Coulter's biography



TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: coulter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

1 posted on 05/26/2004 11:59:18 PM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks

BUMP!


2 posted on 05/27/2004 12:12:04 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

3 posted on 05/27/2004 12:13:54 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

So far, we have found chemical and biological weapons – brucella and Congo-Crimean hemorrhagic fever, ricin, sarin, aflatoxin – and long-range missiles in Iraq.

as well as mustard gas. Bears repeating.


4 posted on 05/27/2004 12:20:11 AM PDT by Jet Jaguar (Who would the terrorists vote for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The beauty of being a liberal is that history always begins this morning. Every day liberals can create a new narrative that destroys the past as it occurred. We have always been at war with Eastasia.

So true. Categories of true/false have no meaning for the left -- only politically expedient or not. Very frightening.

5 posted on 05/27/2004 12:26:51 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maryz

More successes the left ignores - Since 9/11 we have gone 32 months without another domestic flight being hijacked by terrorists. The President has succedded magnificently in making our skies safe once again. Personnally I have taken 20 air flights this year and the biggest problem I experienced was the person sitting next to me on one flight getting air sick twice.


6 posted on 05/27/2004 12:38:58 AM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

I swear..if that lady ever runs for President...she will have my vote!!


7 posted on 05/27/2004 12:41:19 AM PDT by Gator113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Thanks for the eye candy! Annie is one beautiful conservative woman.


8 posted on 05/27/2004 12:48:58 AM PDT by teletech (Friends don't let friends vote DemocRAT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gator113

She's an O'reilly, Hannity and Rush of Conservative minds. She's a real fireplug. Bush/Coulter


9 posted on 05/27/2004 12:53:23 AM PDT by conshack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: teletech

and.....Not afraid to say anything to anybody !!!!!


10 posted on 05/27/2004 12:54:29 AM PDT by conshack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: conshack
and.....Not afraid to say anything to anybody !!!!!

Yes, Ann knows how to cut through liberal BS like a knife.

11 posted on 05/27/2004 1:05:14 AM PDT by teletech (Friends don't let friends vote DemocRAT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

In 1968 there was no vocal opposition to what the press was saying. That's why it was called, "the silent majority".

People today are much better informed. And they are not afraid to speak out in support of our President!

One more thing. LBJ was so stunned by Eugene McCarthy's candidacy and convinced that Tet was a defeat that he announced he would not seek re-election. In the same speech, he announced that peace talks would begin in Paris, and that he would halt the bombing of North Vietnam. His actions alone constitued a turning point in the war.

I see very few similarities between Vietnam and Iraq, aside from the way the left and the media is acting in league to insure our defeat.

As long as Bush does not back down, as Johnson did in 1968, ultimate victory will be ours.


12 posted on 05/27/2004 4:05:02 AM PDT by wingman1 (University of Vietnam '70)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Here are some pix -


13 posted on 05/27/2004 4:10:31 AM PDT by 7thson (I think it takes a big dog to weigh a hundred pounds!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Test is not a bad analogy to describe the Iraqi terrorists April offensive. In April 04 we suffered the highest monthly casualties of the war with 135 US and 5 coalition KIA's. So far thru May 27, we have lost 67 US and 4 coalition troops. Many more of the enemy were killed. Hopefully, like Tet, April will be the high water mark even with the June 30 handover looming. Although you wouldn't know it from media, the enemy is desperate and losing.
14 posted on 05/27/2004 4:22:43 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Tet vice Test


15 posted on 05/27/2004 4:24:30 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 7thson
....... ahhhhhh.......

thanks.

16 posted on 05/27/2004 4:29:50 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

I don't think she's all that hot, personally. Maybe if she went into treatment for the eating disorder she appears to have and gained 20 lbs...


17 posted on 05/27/2004 4:33:53 AM PDT by Ezra Pound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

bump


18 posted on 05/27/2004 4:34:14 AM PDT by RippleFire ("It was just a scratch")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

The Bush admin is pathetic at leading the media. The WH has press conferences every day so should be out there with their own talking points for the day. Don't go out there waiting for the media questions but tell the media what the news is. The new Ari (whatever his name is) is a wimp and doesn't have the backbone to tell them to shut up and listen. It's his game and he brought the ball. Every time a dimwit lies about Bush they should slap them down rather than sit in a corner and let them pile lie on top of lie where the average Joe and Joanna doesn't know the truth. It's evident with Gore yesterday that the rats can now say the sun rises in the west and no one will contradict them.


19 posted on 05/27/2004 4:36:28 AM PDT by mtbopfuyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ezra Pound

Sure, she's thin, but when you take into account what is upstairs, she becomes stunningly gorgeous.


20 posted on 05/27/2004 4:45:54 AM PDT by Crazieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson