Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ACLU demands removal of cross from Los Angeles County seal
AP News ^ | MAy 25,th 2004 | JOHN ANTCZAK

Posted on 05/26/2004 6:19:10 PM PDT by missyme

Edited on 05/26/2004 6:21:47 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

LOS ANGELES (AP) - The American Civil Liberties Union is demanding the removal of a tiny cross that is among historic symbols on Los Angeles County's official seal. The seal "prominently depicts a Latin cross, a sectarian religious symbol that represents the beliefs of one segment of the county's diverse population" and is an "impermissible endorsement of Christianity" by the county government, the ACLU Foundation of Southern California said in a letter to county officials this week. "Under clearly established law, the seal is unconstitutional," the letter said, warning that refusal to remove the cross in a "reasonable time-frame" would cause the ACLU to seek a court order.

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Announcements; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aclu; antichristian; christianity; christians; churchandstate; cross; doublestandard; la; lacountyseal; losangeles; missions; paragraphsryerfriend; purge; religion; religiousintolerance; spanishmissions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 last
To: alnick

Whats really disturbing is that citizens are virtually powerless to stop and prevail in these type of attacks. Where is the ACLJ on this? It is indeed scary that a majority vote on such things can be ruled on by one judge and their own personal interpretation of the laws. It seems the Supreme Court has found dissention on such issues lately, as many of the decisions about religous freedom often swing either way by just one vote. Separation of church and state has gone to far, It has evolved into a radical oppression by a few oppressors. I would appeal to the people to have their senators pass a law that protects what the courts can do to seals and landmarks, and make it so the legislative branch has EQUAL power and say over such matters , which at this point they obviously do not.

Clearly, the Courts decisions to destroy historical religious landmarks is not an example of separation of powers. Not when the Judicial Branch always seems to reign supreme in favor of the minority vote.

This is a democracy, a free Republic and in being so it would seem that the desires of the many should outweigh the desires of the few, as long as there is toleration of all faiths, creeds and religious historical documents and their place in society.

May God save our country.


101 posted on 06/09/2004 1:40:51 PM PDT by tjm (separation of powers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson