Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How ChinaGate Led to 9/11 ^ | 25 May 2004 | Jean Pearce

Posted on 05/25/2004 7:27:41 PM PDT by annyokie

How Chinagate Led to 9/11 By Jean Pearce | May 25, 2004

As the 9/11 Commission tries to uncover what kept intelligence agencies from preventing September 11, it has overlooked two vital factors: Jamie Gorelick and Bill Clinton. Gorelick, who has browbeaten the current administration, helped erect the walls between the FBI, CIA and local investigators that made 9/11 inevitable. However, she was merely expanding the policy Bill Clinton established with Presidential Decision Directive 24. What has been little underreported is why the policy came about: to thwart investigations into the Chinese funding of Clinton’s re-election campaign, and the favors he bestowed on them in return.

In April, staff writer Scott Wheeler reported that a senior U.S. government official and three other sources claimed that the 1995 memo written by Jamie Gorelick, who served as the Clinton Justice Department’s deputy attorney general from 1994 to 1997, created "a roadblock" to the investigation of illegal Chinese donations to the Democratic National Committee. But the picture is much bigger than that. The Gorelick memo, which blocked intelligence agents from sharing information that could have halted the September 11 hijacking plot, was only the mortar in a much larger maze of bureaucratic walls whose creation Gorelick personally oversaw.

It’s a story the 9/11 Commission may not want to hear, and one that Gorelick – now incredibly a member of that commission – has so far refused to tell. But it is perhaps the most crucial one to understanding the intentional breakdown of intelligence that led to the September 11 disaster.

Nearly from the moment Gorelick took office in the Clinton Justice Department, she began acting as the point woman for a large-scale bureaucratic reorganization of intelligence agencies that ultimately placed the gathering of intelligence, and decisions about what – if anything – would be done with it. This entire operation was under near-direct control of the White House. In the process, more than a dozen CIA and FBI investigations underway at the time got caught beneath the heel of the presidential boot, investigations that would ultimately reveal massive Chinese espionage as millions in illegal Chinese donations filled Democratic Party campaign coffers.

When Gorelick took office in 1994, the CIA was reeling from the news that a Russian spy had been found in CIA ranks, and Congress was hungry for a quick fix. A month after Gorelick was sworn in, Bill Clinton issued Presidential Decision Directive 24. PDD 24 put intelligence gathering under the direct control of the president’s National Security Council, and ultimately the White House, through a four-level, top-down chain of command set up to govern (that is, stifle) intelligence sharing and cooperation between intelligence agencies. From the moment the directive was implemented, intelligence sharing became a bureaucratic nightmare that required negotiating a befuddling bureaucracy that stopped directly at the President’s office.

First, the directive effectively neutered the CIA by creating a National Counterintelligence Center (NCI) to oversee the Agency. NCI was staffed by an FBI agent appointed by the Clinton administration. It also brought multiple international investigations underway at the time under direct administrative control. The job of the NCI was to “implement counterintelligence activities,” which meant that virtually everything the CIA did, from a foreign intelligence agent’s report to polygraph test results, now passed through the intelligence center that PDD 24 created.

NCI reported to an administration-appointed National Counterintelligence Operations Board (NCOB) charged with “discussing counterintelligence matters.” The NCOB in turn reported to a National Intelligence Policy Board, which coordinated activities between intelligence agencies attempting to work together. The policy board reported “directly” to the president through the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs.

The result was a massive bureaucratic roadblock for the CIA – which at the time had a vast lead on the FBI in foreign intelligence – and for the FBI itself, which was also forced to report to the NCOB. This hampered cooperation between the two entities. All this occurred at a time when both agencies were working separate ends of investigations that would eventually implicate China in technology transfers and the Democratic Party in a Chinese campaign cash grab.

And the woman charged with selling this plan to Congress, convince the media and ultimately implement much of it? Jamie Gorelick.

Many in Congress, including some Democrats, found the changes PDD 24 put in place baffling: they seemed to do nothing to insulate the CIA from infiltration while devastating the agency’s ability to collect information. At the time, Democrat House Intelligence Chairman Dan Glickman referred to the plan as “regulatory gobbledygook." Others questioned how FBI control of CIA intelligence would foster greater communication between the lower levels of the CIA and FBI, now that all information would have to be run through a multi-tier bureaucratic maze that only went upward.

Despite their doubts, Gorelick helped the administration sell the plan on Capitol Hill. The Directive stood.

But that wasn’t good enough for the Clinton administration, which wanted control over every criminal and intelligence investigation, domestic and foreign, for reasons that would become apparent in a few years. For the first time in Justice Department history, a political appointee, Richard Scruggs – an old crony or Attorney General Janet Reno’s from Florida – was put in charge of the Office of Intelligence and Policy Review (OIPR). OIPR is the Justice Department agency in charge of requesting wiretap and surveillance authority for criminal and intelligence investigations on behalf of investigative agencies from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court. The court’s activities are kept secret from the public.

A year after PDD 24, with the new bureaucratic structure loaded with administration appointees, Gorelick drafted the 1995 memo Attorney General John Ashcroft mentioned while testifying before the 9/11 Commission. The Gorelick memo, and other supporting memos released in recent weeks, not only created walls within the intelligence agencies that prevented information sharing among their own agents, but effectively walled these agencies off from each other and from outside contact with the U.S. prosecutors instrumental in helping them gather the evidence needed to make the case for criminal charges.

The only place left to go with intelligence information – particularly for efforts to share intelligence information or obtain search warrants – was straight up Clinton and Gorelick’s multi-tiered chain of command. Instead, information lethal to the Democratic Party languished inside the Justice Department, trapped behind Gorelick’s walls.

The implications were enormous. In her letter of protest to Attorney General Reno over Gorelick’s memo, United States Attorney Mary Jo White spelled them out: “These instructions leave entirely to OIPR and the (Justice Department) Criminal Division when, if ever, to contact affected U.S. attorneys on investigations including terrorism and espionage,” White wrote. (Like OIPR, the Criminal Division is also part of the Justice Department.)

Without an enforcer, the walls might Gorelick’s memo put in place might not have held. But Scruggs acted as that enforcer, and he excelled at it. Scruggs maintained Gorelick’s walls between the FBI and Justice's Criminal Division by threatening to automatically reject any FBI request for a wiretap or search warrant if the Bureau contacted the Justice Department's Criminal Division without permission. This deprived the FBI, and ultimately the CIA, of gathering advice and assistance from the Criminal Division that was critical in espionage and terrorist cases.

It is no coincidence that this occurred at the same time both the FBI and the CIA were churning up evidence damaging to the Democratic Party, its fundraisers, the Chinese and ultimately the Clinton administration itself. Between 1994 and the 1996 election, as Chinese dollars poured into Democratic coffers, Clinton struggled to reopen high-tech trade to China. Had agents confirmed Chinese theft of weapons technology or its transfer of weapons technology to nations like Pakistan, Iran and Syria, Clinton would have been forced by law and international treaty to react.

Gorelick’s appointment to the job at Justice in 1994 occurred during a period in which the FBI had begun to systematically investigate technology theft by foreign powers. For the first time, these investigations singled out the U.S. chemical, telecommunications, aircraft and aerospace industries for intelligence collection.

By the time Gorelick wrote the March 1995 memo that sealed off American intelligence agencies from each other and the outside world, all of the most critical Chinagate investigations by American intelligence agencies were already underway. Some of their findings were damning:

In an investigation originally instigated by the CIA, the FBI was beginning its search for the source of the leak of W-88 nuclear warhead technology to China among the more than 1,000 people who had access to the secrets. Despite Justice Department stonewalling and the Department’s refusal to seek wiretap authority in 1997, the investigation eventually led to Wen Ho Lee and the Los Alamos National Laboratory. The FBI first collected Extensive evidence in 1995 linking illegal Democratic Party donations to China, according to the Congressional Record. But Congress and the Director of the CIA didn’t find out about the Justice Department’s failure to act upon that evidence until 1997, safely after the 1996 election. According to classified CIA documents leaked to the Washington Times, between 1994 and 1997, the CIA learned that China sold Iran missile technology, a nuclear fission reactor, advanced air-defense radar and chemical agents. The Chinese also provided 5,000 ring magnets to Pakistan, used in producing weapons-grade uranium. The Chinese also provided uranium fuel for India's reactors.

In many cases the CIA resorting to leaking classified information to the media, in an effort to bypass the administration’s blackout.

Gorelick knew these facts well. While Clinton may have refused to meet with top CIA officials, Gorelick didn’t. According to a 1996 report by the legal news service American Lawyer Media, Gorelick and then-Deputy Director of the CIA George Tenet met every other week to discuss intelligence and intelligence sharing.

But those in the Clinton administration weren’t the only ones to gain from the secrecy. In 1994, the McDonnell Douglas Corporation transferred military-use machine tools to the China National Aero-Technology Import and Export Corporation that ended up in the hands of the Chinese army. The sale occurred despite Defense Department objections. McDonnell Douglas was a client of the Miller Cassidy Larroca & Lewin, L.L.P. (now called Baker Botts), the Washington, D.C., law firm where Gorelick worked for 17 years and was a partner. Ray Larroca, another partner in the firm, represented McDonnell in the Justice Department’s investigation of the technology transfer.

In 1995, General Electric, a former client of Gorelick’s, also had much to lose if the damaging information the CIA and the FBI had reached Congress. At the time, GE was publicly lobbying for a lucrative permit to assist the Chinese in replacing coal-fired power stations with nuclear plants. A 1990 law required that the president certify to Congress that China was not aiding in nuclear proliferation before U.S. companies could execute the business agreement.

Moreover, in 1995, Michael Armstrong, then the CEO of Hughes Electronics – a division of General Electric and another client of Miller Cassidy Larroca & Lewin – was publicly lobbying Clinton to switch satellite export controls from the State Department to the Commerce Department. After the controls were lifted, Hughes and another company gave sensitive data to the Chinese, equipment a Pentagon study later concluded would allow China to develop intercontinental and submarine-launched ballistic missiles aimed at American targets. Miller Cassidy Larroca & Lewin partner Randall Turk represented Hughes in the Congressional, State Department, and Justice Department investigations that resulted.

The Cox Report, which detailed Chinese espionage for Congress during the period, revealed that FBI surveillance caught Chinese officials frantically trying to keep Democratic donor Johnny Chung from divulging any information that would be damaging to Hughes Electronics. Chung funneled $300,000 in illegal contributions from the Chinese military to the DNC between 1994 and 1996.

It was this web of investigations that led Gorelick and Bill Clinton to erect the wall between intelligence agencies that resulted in the toppling of the Twin Towers. The connections go on and on, but they all lead back to Gorelick, the one person who could best explain how the Clinton administration neutered the American intelligence agencies that could have stopped the September 11 plot. Yet another high crime will have been committed if the September 11 Commission doesn’t demand testimony from her.

TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 911; abledanger; atta; china; chinagate; clinton; gorelick; prequel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-120 next last
Apologies if this is a repost.
1 posted on 05/25/2004 7:27:43 PM PDT by annyokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple; Molly Pitcher

The Manchurian Candidate indeed.

2 posted on 05/25/2004 7:34:13 PM PDT by ABG(anybody but Gore) (Mark Hamill: "I can't murder anybody."-Lee Marvin: "You don't murder animals, you kill them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ABG(anybody but Gore)

Infuriating, isn't it? And when that report comes out, none of this will be mentioned.

3 posted on 05/25/2004 7:42:49 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple


4 posted on 05/25/2004 7:43:41 PM PDT by malia (BUSH/CHENEY '04 NEVER FORGET!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: annyokie


5 posted on 05/25/2004 7:44:01 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (same parts of the above may qualify as plagiarism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annyokie

Clinton escapes again.


6 posted on 05/25/2004 7:46:18 PM PDT by Rocky (Kerry cannot decide what style of empty suit he should be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annyokie

Good post anny!

7 posted on 05/25/2004 7:46:20 PM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl


8 posted on 05/25/2004 7:51:02 PM PDT by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I am honored, Fearless Leader.

9 posted on 05/25/2004 7:55:19 PM PDT by annyokie (There are two sides to every argument, but I'm too busy to listen to yours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: annyokie


10 posted on 05/25/2004 8:00:33 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (same parts of the above may qualify as plagiarism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

; )

11 posted on 05/25/2004 8:04:06 PM PDT by annyokie (There are two sides to every argument, but I'm too busy to listen to yours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ABG(anybody but Gore)

Why doesn't any body write a book about this? This is true insider abuse of our system. This is proof again the democratic party is a criminal enterprise.

How can we get it out though? It does not make a good 30 second sound bite. It needs thought and that is not like the average American.

Almost every day there is a reason to be more sorry for this country.

12 posted on 05/25/2004 8:29:59 PM PDT by JSteff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: annyokie


13 posted on 05/25/2004 8:30:49 PM PDT by jmstein7 (Real Men Don't Need Chunks of Government Metal on Their Chests to be Heroes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSteff
As a writer, I would love to 'ghost write' such a book!

The clinton goon squad wanted to devolve the U.S. from sole super power to an 'also powerful'. Albright even admitted this on television during a slip of her corrupt tongue. The media made not a whit about this revelation of the clinton goals for America. But we see that they were working hard to sell our secrets to the Chinese and allow the proliferation of nuclear weaponry around the world, in exchange for campaign funds to insure their election retention of power over US. Had goreghoul won in 2000, this nation would now be subsertvient to the all mighty U.N. that Kerry wants to 'give our troops and our treasure over to for dealing with Iraq and the war on terrorism'. This nation will not survive a Kerry or Hatellary presidency. And with the corruption revealed through the multilayered walls that allowed the democrats to sell us out for campaign funds, we see exactly what they will go right back to if they regain power. But what should we expect from a political party that decades ago decided to 'sacrifice' the alive unborn for slaughter in order to gain votes of feminists and fellow socialist bastards? Democrats are true to their lust for power, and nothing else is sacred to the bastards.

14 posted on 05/25/2004 9:27:05 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: annyokie


15 posted on 05/26/2004 12:28:03 AM PDT by AnimalLover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annyokie


16 posted on 05/26/2004 3:20:20 PM PDT by Pagey (Hillary Rotten is (still ) a Smug and Holier- than- Thou Socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


good time to review this anyone?

17 posted on 01/25/2006 6:23:43 PM PST by Sic Luceat Lux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Sic Luceat Lux

I would still write it, but not a soul has contacted me regarding same.

18 posted on 01/26/2006 7:27:42 AM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

but not a soul has contacted me regarding same.

Have to shine a light on all this, huh. (thanks for responding to my post)

19 posted on 02/01/2006 5:49:09 PM PST by Sic Luceat Lux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN; annyokie; Alamo-Girl; Jim Robinson; JSteff; B4Ranch; Travis McGee; joanie-f; ...

Anyone know why there is such a lack of interest in discussing Bill Clinton and the DNC's Chinagate??

20 posted on 02/01/2006 5:55:48 PM PST by Sic Luceat Lux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-120 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson