Nicely done, and probably 100% true. But you did not provide any evidence to back up some key assertions.
For instance, how do you know she was considered for both the AG and CIA spots?
Do you have any sources who can independently confirm your conclusion that she wants to be AG? If so, that would also be a big plus.
I disagree with one of your comments: That Janet Reno had perceived impartiality, and that this helped deflect inquiries into Billy's many scandals. If you have a Clinton admin source for that fine, but otherwise it does not ring true. A more likely reason is that she was completely under Billy's thumb.
The White House Bulletin, JANUARY 31, 1995
Sunday Times, November 10, 1996
Do you have any sources who can independently confirm your conclusion that she wants to be AG? If so, that would also be a big plus.
The Washington Times, February 11, 1994
The American Spectator, June, 1994
The White House Bulletin, May 28, 1996
The Washington Times, June 20, 1996
Providence Journal-Bulletin (Rhode Island), April 16, 1997
The Recorder, December 24, 1997
I disagree with one of your comments: That Janet Reno had perceived impartiality, and that this helped deflect inquiries into Billy's many scandals. If you have a Clinton admin source for that fine, but otherwise it does not ring true. A more likely reason is that she was completely under Billy's thumb.
See Dick Morris's recent book, Rewriting History
I've done my homework here, but I won't reveal all of my research secrets. If you really want the answers, go through the sources I've outlined.