Thomas Kean says I am the most non-partisan, bi-partisan member of the 911 Commission. Well, ain't I SPECIAL !?
Posted on 05/25/2004 7:19:57 PM PDT by jmstein7
Thanks, CB!
And isn't that sad?
You can't buy journalism at a newspaper anymore. You have to unbury it from a conservative website.
It's indeed what we expect of our big name journalists, including those on Fox.
Thomas Kean says I am the most non-partisan, bi-partisan member of the 911 Commission. Well, ain't I SPECIAL !?
Trying sending to magazine that Fred Barnes writes for.
Send it as an opinion piece to local newspapers.
I'll private mail you a long list I picked up from a DU site (tee hee).
Good work!
I dug this up a while ago - I think it's worthy of a mention.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1118806/posts
FReeper Research: GORELICK WORKED WITH RICHARD CLARKE! (HHS website transcript)
---
Also some good stuff posted in the comments!
TWA Flight 800, and the Gorelick connection http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1118671/posts
DEEPER CIA LINK BY 9/11 PANELIST http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1118652/posts
Also connections to the killing the investigation ito Islamic terrorists role in the Oklahoma bombing.
Ping!
Great read! Saw one typo. Line 1, paragraph 7: use "an" instead of "a" iron-fisted...
Girls just want to have fun.
Lots of good info there, and I agree that she'd like to be AG.
I just don't see it happening under a JFK presidency.
She is one of Hillary's creatures and will not be able to disentangle herself from Hillary's coat-tails.
She will have to wait for the first Hillary admiistration to fullfill her dream.
God help us all.
Nicely done, and probably 100% true. But you did not provide any evidence to back up some key assertions.
For instance, how do you know she was considered for both the AG and CIA spots?
Do you have any sources who can independently confirm your conclusion that she wants to be AG? If so, that would also be a big plus.
I disagree with one of your comments: That Janet Reno had perceived impartiality, and that this helped deflect inquiries into Billy's many scandals. If you have a Clinton admin source for that fine, but otherwise it does not ring true. A more likely reason is that she was completely under Billy's thumb.
With other women.
The White House Bulletin, JANUARY 31, 1995
Sunday Times, November 10, 1996
Do you have any sources who can independently confirm your conclusion that she wants to be AG? If so, that would also be a big plus.
The Washington Times, February 11, 1994
The American Spectator, June, 1994
The White House Bulletin, May 28, 1996
The Washington Times, June 20, 1996
Providence Journal-Bulletin (Rhode Island), April 16, 1997
The Recorder, December 24, 1997
I disagree with one of your comments: That Janet Reno had perceived impartiality, and that this helped deflect inquiries into Billy's many scandals. If you have a Clinton admin source for that fine, but otherwise it does not ring true. A more likely reason is that she was completely under Billy's thumb.
See Dick Morris's recent book, Rewriting History
I've done my homework here, but I won't reveal all of my research secrets. If you really want the answers, go through the sources I've outlined.
No she just has a sheaf of incredibly damaging FBI files in her safe at home.
Good answers. You've done your homework.
The article would benefit if you supported your points with some of the sources you posted here.
Great post BUMP!
No room to do so... I plan on submitting this as an op-ed, and I need to preserve my space for as much actual substance and argument as possible.
If this, on the other hand, were an academic assignment, I would put the sources in as footnotes. Can't exactly do that in an op-ed where you have limited space to make your points.
If that is what you think, then you truly do not understand the Leftists who are working to destroy America. You think they lose sleep over what happened on September 11, 2001? Let me tell you, they'd willingly repeat that day one thousand times over if it gave them what they want: complete totalitarian control of the United States and the destruction of our Constitution (which they despise).
Sound incredible? Then don't take my word for it, take theirs:
These photos were taken at the "Global Day of Action" rally in San Francisco, CA on Saturday, March 20th, 2004.
(Note: I did not take these photos.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
