Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Widescale Biodiesel Production from Algae
University of New Hampshire, Physics Department : UNH Biodiesel Group ^ | Michael Briggs

Posted on 05/25/2004 4:28:06 PM PDT by ckilmer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: DuncanWaring
Anything Into Oil 1may03

"We will be able to make oil for $8 to $12 a barrel," says Paul Baskis, the inventor of the process.
Very interesting, and nothing to say that it couldn't use algae as its feedstock. We could grow algae in the desert and export oil!

What word on this that's less than a year old??

21 posted on 05/25/2004 6:27:47 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Reeses
Algae floats. Why not just fertilize the ocean far away from land? It would also feed lots of new sea life we could eat, and suck massive amounts of carbon dioxide right out of the air, allowing everyone to drive around in SUVs, not just John Kommy's family.

They've already done successful experiments by seeding the oceans with iron to grow algae to suck up CO2.

22 posted on 05/25/2004 6:32:08 PM PDT by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
The operating costs (including power consumption, labor, chemicals, and fixed capital costs (taxes, maintenance, insurance, depreciation, and return on investment) worked out to $12,000 per hectare. That would equate to $50.7 billion per year for all the algae farms, to yield all the oil feedstock necessary for the entire country. Compare that to the more than $100 billion the US spends each year just on purchasing crude oil from foreign countries.

If this really is such a good idea the venture capitalists would have already done it. My suspicion is this paper was written by hippies smoking too much dope.

23 posted on 05/25/2004 6:34:10 PM PDT by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS

Hey, this is the first logical exposition I've seen in a long time. Hydrogen has soooo many problems.


24 posted on 05/25/2004 6:41:02 PM PDT by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier
Next they'll be breeding us like cattle!

You are, of course refering to India and China.....;-)

25 posted on 05/25/2004 6:42:58 PM PDT by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: randog

Right you are. The enviroscum aren't about keeping the environment clean, they're just another bunch of commies.


26 posted on 05/25/2004 6:45:50 PM PDT by Sofa King (MY rights are not subject to YOUR approval http://www.angelfire.com/art2/sofaking/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
There are two steps that would need to be taken for producing biodiesel on a large scale - growing the feedstocks, and processing them into biodiesel. The latter step would perhaps be best accomplished by existing oil refineries within the US being converted to biodiesel refineries, but could also be accomplished by new companies building new plants.

Hmm. Build a new refinery? Good luck.

27 posted on 05/25/2004 6:46:11 PM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Imal

You were wondering about alternative fuel sources. Here 'ya go--Soylent Oil.


28 posted on 05/25/2004 7:04:28 PM PDT by randog (Everything works great 'til the current flows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randog

Soylent Oil is people! It's peeeeeople!


29 posted on 05/25/2004 9:14:45 PM PDT by Imal (Evolution is not an across-the-board proposition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion
Less than a year old?

Here's a reference to a paper presented at some conference earlier this year. (unfortunately, a couple of weeks ago someone else referenced it and I called it "pedantic". oh well)

Check some of the footnotes. It appears to be a going concern.

30 posted on 05/25/2004 10:29:32 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (...and Freedom tastes of Reality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford
Publicly traded?

I don't think so.

Here's their website.

There are no references evident to "Investor Information".

31 posted on 05/25/2004 10:53:03 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (...and Freedom tastes of Reality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Husker24
They wont be happy until the U.S looks like Afganistan.

Yeah, well what pisses me off is that none of these damn hippies would last a day in genuine high desert wilderness, and most have never even seen it in person or comprehend the vastness of it. On the other hand, I've rescued hippie f**kwits who managed to get themselves stuck in the Nevada wilderness on no less than five different occasions when offroading in the vast expanses of mountains around my very remote ranch on business of one type or another.

I have no patience for those idiots. I very nicely enumerate the long list of things they did wrong and then basically tell to never show their faces out there again unless they can discard their neurotic fantasy about what the real wilderness is actually like. Maybe it is the fact that I have a pistol on my belt that they just nod and say 'yessir' to whatever I say; I've met a number who are apparently unaware that gun in the western wilderness is about as essential as your boots. Never mind the stupidity of running off 40 miles into the random wilderness without backup or adequate equipment. Those bloody twits think Central Park in Manhattan qualifies as wilderness. They can't even conceive of being 100 miles from the nearest pavement.

Feh. I am as cosmopolitan as they come, but my roots are in the extremely rural west. Nothing yanks my chain like a bunch of city slicker blowhards who think they know something about the wilderness.

32 posted on 05/26/2004 12:47:55 AM PDT by tortoise (All these moments lost in time, like tears in the rain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Imal

Bingo!


33 posted on 05/26/2004 8:44:33 AM PDT by null and void (The owls are not what they seem...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

My rough estimate....it costs half the cost of oil to grow the algae (say $15/barrel, from article) plus $12/barrel to turn it into oil (TDP process) plus an unknown amount to seperate the algae from the water and concentrate it into an appropriate input. Further, it requires specialized refineries. So somewhere north of $27/barrel there is a little bit of money to START covering the costs of the investment necessary. Not economically feasible at this point. But it could be useful either if oil actually goes and stays high and it could be used to chill out the environazi 'we're running out of oil' scaremongers.


34 posted on 05/26/2004 8:58:50 AM PDT by blanknoone (I voted for before I voted against it, didn't show up for the vote except once, but left too early)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
At this point, it's a "boutique" fuel; hence, the higher price. Here in CA, we pay more for gas than the rest of the country because of our requirements for low emission boutique fuels. It's all a question of economies of scale. Produce more of the boutique fuel and it ceases to be a pricey specialty item.
35 posted on 05/26/2004 4:04:07 PM PDT by Redcloak (Have you hugged your tagline today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson