Posted on 05/20/2004 10:42:51 PM PDT by Names Ash Housewares
The evidence shows that Chalabi personally gave Iranian intelligence officers information so sensitive that if revealed it could, quote, "get Americans killed." The evidence is said to be "rock solid."
Perle?
Because that would make the Bush administration look even worse than if he was just a friend....In other words, if he's arrested for spying, how and why did he get the information to spy with?
OH BullSh$T.
There's a question many Republicans have long been asking:
Q: "Why on Earth are we keeping Clinton Administration holdover George Tenet as head of the CIA?!"
In my opinion, the answer may just be:
A: Tenet was a committed player with the Bush Administration about overthrowing Saddam based upon Chalabi's manufactured 'intelligence'.
It's no secret that US policy has been to overthrow Saddam since the end of the 1991 Gulf War. Even during Clinton's presidency, Congress led by Trent Lott took credit for funnelling millions to the 'Iraqi National Congress' which ended up in Chalabi's hands. This same Chalabi that's sentenced in absentia to 22 years in Jordan for bank fraud.
Chalabi's tricksterism has spanned three American presidencies. Rather than depose Saddam in an uprising -- something he could have never brought off -- he eventually got the US government to do it for him via 'Operation Iraqi Freedom' by frightening our post-9/11 sensibilities with the partially genuine threat of Saddam's hidden WMD arsenal.
The worst possible outcome here is that Chalabi tricked Bush into overthrowing Saddam to make Iraq's Shi'ite minority easy pickings for the Islamic Republic of Iran.
It isn't even Chalabi that is under suspicion it is this guy Karim.
You may be onto something here. However, the intel he provided was not the only reason for this war.
It isn't even Chalibi that is being accused. Read this
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1139634/posts
Only if you needed a warm and fuzzy reason to make an example in Iraq to the surrounding region.

|
Just found this... U.S. officials have been irritated at the adversarial role he has played within the U.S.-picked Iraqi Governing Council. He has openly clashed with L. Paul Bremer III, the U.S. administrator in Iraq, and pushed for the new Iraqi government to have more power, including over security forces and oil revenues. He has been in the middle of an increasingly bitter fight with the U.S.-led Coalition Provisional Authority over the investigation of the United Nations' "oil-for-food" program. U.S. officials are unhappy that he has been unwilling to turn over documents scooped up after the war that bear on the investigation. And also...
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Damn. Well he is staring to stink like fish. This could really be bad.
Neocon Lets Cat Out of Bag
Robert Dreyfuss
May 19, 2004
Michael Rubina young staffer at the American Enterprise Institute whos just left the Pentagon, where he played a small role as a neocon cog in the Office of Special Plans war machinelet a herd of cats out of the bag about his favorite Iraqi phony, Ahmad Chalabi of the Iraqi National Congress.
Chalabi, of course, is the roly-poly perpetrator of intelligence fraud and the convicted bank embezzler who still hopes to be leader of Iraq. Lately, Chalabi has scuttled into a would-be alliance with Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, the scowly fatwa man. In doing so, hes had the temerity to criticize the United States, leading some fuzzy thinkers to believe that Chalabi, whose puppet strings are made of steel, might be trying to show some independence from Washington. Well, says Rubin, who served as one the Pentagons liaisons to Chalabi, thats exactly what they want you to think:
Much of the information he collected was to roll up the insurgency and Ba'athist cells. It caught people red-handed," said Michael Rubin, a former Pentagon adviser who is now at a conservative think-tank, the American Enterprise Institute.
"By telegraphing that he is not the favorite son of America, the administration will bolster him, showing he is his own man."
In other words, its all a big con game. The still-neocon-dominated Pentagonwhich this week stopped funding Chalabis INC is playing its last card, hoping that it can boost Chalabis sagging fortunes by pretending to sever ties with him. That, the neocons hope, will allow Chalabi to strengthen his ties to Sistani, the king-making mullah who, they hope, holds Iraqs fate in his wrinkled hands.
Here is something of a wierd take of flip-flop personalities:
"He has completely marginalized himself and turned himself into a pathetic, strange figure," says Francis Brooke, Washington adviser to the anti-Hussein Iraqi National Congress. "Which is too bad, because he is not crazy."
The above quote is not about Ahmad Chalabi but about Scott Ritter. Strange distancing from the real players.

|
Look, I take anyone that throws around the term "neo-con" as being agenda driven prone to hyperbole and isolationist in outlook.
May 4, 2004
"...Chalabi's ties to Iran -- Israel's most dangerous enemy -- have also alarmed both his allies and his enemies in the Bush administration. Those ties were highlighted on Monday, when Newsweek reported that "U.S. officials say that electronic intercepts of discussions between Iranian leaders indicate that Chalabi and his entourage told Iranian contacts about American political plans in Iraq." According to one government source, some of the information he gave Iran "could get people killed." A Chalabi aide denied the allegation. According to Newsweek, the State Department and the CIA -- Chalabi's longtime enemies -- were behind the leak: "the State Department and the CIA are using the intelligence about his Iran ties to persuade the president to cut him loose once and for all."..."
The article above linked to a Newsweek piece dated May 10:
"..But U.S. intelligence agencies have recently raised concerns that Chalabi has become too close to Iran's theocratic rulers. NEWSWEEK has learned that top Bush administration officials have been briefed on intelligence indicating that Chalabi and some of his top aides have supplied Iran with "sensitive" information on the American occupation in Iraq. U.S. officials say that electronic intercepts of discussions between Iranian leaders indicate that Chalabi and his entourage told Iranian contacts about American political plans in Iraq. There are also indications that Chalabi has provided details of U.S. security operations. According to one U.S. government source, some of the information Chalabi turned over to Iran could "get people killed." (A Chalabi aide calls the allegations "absolutely false.").."
I wonder who the ONE US Government Source is?
The intel that Chalabi gave us that we acted upon may be the *primary* reason for this war, however.
My view about this whole mess is that I really don't care what the reasoning was for going to war against Saddam because I know we were justified the moment he violated the ceasefire agreement by firing so much as a BB-gun at a Coalition plane protecting the UN's 'No-Fly Zones' as well as prohibiting the UN's WMD inspectors from doing their job. If the world can't agree on those issues, perhaps it's time we fold up the United Nations or at least kick it out of the USA.
There's half a million dead human beings in mass graves in Iraq and they didn't get in those pits as a result of the Iran/Iraq War. The construction of Saddam's 'Supergun' cannon in the desert designed to lob WMD shells (that are still turning up, in fact, as roadside bombs) into Tel Aviv shows what kind of mad scientist plans Saddam had in mind, and the dead Kurds he gassed are the proof of his willingness to unleash them.
I have a feeling that the recent car bombing that killed the then IGC president could be connected to this. The only odd thing being he was a Shite.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.