Your pretense of failing to understand the obvious fact that a person's flaws and prejudices are more likely to be raised by his critics than by his allies is not convincing. Try arguing honestly, or at least try a better grade of obfuscation.
I am hardly the one obfuscating. When you hurl ridiculous unfounded accusations at Buchanan, but ignore his actual points under discussion, you are obviously engaging in obfuscation. I will admit not a very good grade of obfuscation, but obfuscation, nonetheless.
In order not to facilitate your obfuscation, I will remind you that the actual subject was the ridiculous proposals by certain phoney Conservatives to try to use the United States to foist the Feminist Agenda on the Near East. And Pat made the point in respect thereto, that considering the moral havoc that Agenda has already worked in the United States, we do not have very good credentials to be telling anyone else how to live.
Three Cheers for Pat. There is no question, to any impartial observer, surfing by, who had the better argument, Pat or those smearing him.
William Flax