What a joke. Am I correct in recalling that Mel Gibson didn't go around whining how no one would finance "The Passion"? Didn't he have to pay for it himself? I seem to recall that he took a big risk, and a lot of liberals hoped it would ruin him financially. As for Michael Moore's film, give me a break. Like President Bush has time for this crap. Someone should ask Michael Moore why he can't get Mrs. Heinz Kerry to finance the film? It would be a good investment for her, right? I'm sure she can afford it. Why doesn't he ask her for the money? Funny how the left's "artistic freedom" always ends up costing someone else's money... why doesn't Moore pay for his film distribution himself, like Mel Gibson did?
That's just it...Moore isn't going to have trouble financing his film because there are a lot of leftists who will lend a hand. I've already read that Harvey W. with Miramax wants to do it. He's known this for a year now...and he's using this fake controversy to get free exposure, especially since his liberal brethren in the media will run its legs off.