Skip to comments.
THE GREAT ISLAMIST CALIPHATE
-- Democrats' Power Lust Will Trigger Islamist Apocolypse Now!
ICONOCLAST ^
| by Larry Abraham
Posted on 05/16/2004 7:31:18 AM PDT by clintonbaiter
We are in the battle of our lives, a battle which will go on for many years possibly even generations. If we fail to understand what we are facing, or falter in the challenge of "knowing our enemy" the results will be catastrophic. Imagine a world where al Qaeda regimes control 75% of the world's oil, have at their disposal nuclear weapons, legions of willing suicide soldiers, and our national survival is dependent on the good graces of Kofi Annan and the United Nations......
(Excerpt) Read more at iconoclast.ca ...
TOPICS: Canada; Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: balkans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Scary scenario. The Democrats will do anything in their lust for power -- even destroy America!
Very insightful and erudite author. Time to rally around Bush & Rumsfeld, despite their bungling of the Iraq occupation.
To: clintonbaiter
2
posted on
05/16/2004 7:43:22 AM PDT
by
Ron in Acreage
(Kerry is a threat to national security)
To: clintonbaiter
Time to rally around Bush & Rumsfeld, despite their bungling of the Iraq occupation.
-----
I'm just about to start reading the article, but couldn't help but call you on this. This type language is EXACTLY what I think this article is about. There surely have been mistakes made and miscalculations, but that's inevitable when undertaking a large operation like this. Heck, I make mistakes in even the simple things I do everyday. I don't know about you. (Maybe there are no erasers on your pencils.) This is not a movie script where everything happens as it should and all the players are where they need to be when they need to be there. This is real life with real enemies who are trying NOT to be where they are supposed to be when they are supposed to be there. We have to try to outsmart them and so far we have, but to say we've BUNGLED it is precisely the wording that the DemocRATS want to use because that conjures up images that we are losing and we are NOT losing.
The DemocRATS and Third Partiers want people to think this is a 2-hour movie where everything goes right for the good guys, and when 1 little thing goes wrong, it's a "BUNGLE". Nothing could be further from the truth. This is WAR, and in WAR, as with any real life situation, (SH)Stuff Happens. I hear enough of that BS from the other side of the isle, I don't need to hear it from my side.
OK, enough rant. Now I'll go read the article.
3
posted on
05/16/2004 7:51:15 AM PDT
by
gooleyman
((You'll NEVER agree with ANYONE about EVERYTHING. You'll NEVER agree with a DemocRAT about ANYTHING))
To: clintonbaiter
4
posted on
05/16/2004 7:56:07 AM PDT
by
boycott
To: clintonbaiter
Thanks for posting this. In all my years at FR, this is probably the most important article ever posted. EVERYONE should read it and pass it on to all they know. It's the only way we have a prayer of saving our country from these fanatics.
5
posted on
05/16/2004 8:07:16 AM PDT
by
demkicker
To: clintonbaiter
From the Article: Either none of the Democrats currently leading the drive to their party's nomination are aware of the facts of the Great Caliphate and Third Jihad or they do know, and they don't care so long as their power lust is satisfied.
-----
Oh Yeah, they know alright. And they also don't care. The DemocRATS operate under the same rules of engagement as the Communists, Socialists, Jihadists, etc....i.e. "The End Justifies the Means." They will say or do ANYTHING and destroy ANYONE to regain their power, and...to keep it. We all saw what happened to Clintoons "enemies." They care not about the truth or reality. The reality is as I told you in my own "rant" earlier. With any undertaking, you have to allow for the inevitable (SH)Stuff that WILL happen. DemocRATS are like mosquitoes. They hover and wait for an opportunity (a "bungle") to sneak in a take a suck. And they can't stand the daylight (i.e. the truth.) I hate mosquitoes and revel in their destruction.
6
posted on
05/16/2004 8:30:43 AM PDT
by
gooleyman
((You'll NEVER agree with ANYONE about EVERYTHING. You'll NEVER agree with a DemocRAT about ANYTHING))
To: clintonbaiter
I have forwarded this article to everyone I know. I have heard references from a variety of different people as to a larger strategic plan in the Middle East and what they are saying is in concert with this article. That is why I have a visceral reaction to this whole "prison abuse" scandal. People are missing the ticket (joebucks) and it is becoming demoralizing.
7
posted on
05/16/2004 8:33:35 AM PDT
by
lt.america
(Captain was already taken)
To: clintonbaiter
That shows just how stupid they are. Do they really think kissing the A of Islamofascists will give them a seat at the table of Satan. Ofcourse they think theat. But reality is they will get to be the stars of the beheading videos to keep the "rest of us" in line.
8
posted on
05/16/2004 8:40:30 AM PDT
by
marty60
To: clintonbaiter
"President Bush and his administration spokesmen are not telling the American people what they really need to know about this "war." If they don't do that between now and November, it may cost them the election." Boy, is that ever true!
9
posted on
05/16/2004 8:56:46 AM PDT
by
TheLion
To: TheLion
Thanks for that article. I am so tired of hearing people say that Islam is a religion of peace. Only a few are bad, etc... If they are truly following their religion then they wish to convert or kill you is how I understand it. So, why are we allowing so many to come to America? I wish someone in the main stream press would talk about this. I just don't want people to be naive to the possible danger around them.
To: clintonbaiter
They are hardly 'bungling' Iraq! What they have done, what the DOD has done, is take a new and forward-looking approach to defeating tyrannical dictators and then changing the responsibilities of the liberated people from serfdom to self-rule. You obviously don't agree with the new methodology, but you will admit (if honest, Mr. Biden) that Saddam was deposed in short order with a minimum of casualties and more quickly than anyone could anticipate and thus exploit.
11
posted on
05/16/2004 9:25:19 AM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
To: gooleyman
This type language is EXACTLY what I think this article is about. There surely have been mistakes made and miscalculations, but that's inevitable when undertaking a large operation like this YEp, like scummy liberals never soil their hands going to the bathroom... hell, I think they have potty training problems as a matter of fact.
To: clintonbaiter
"Wahhabiism calls for the complete and total rejection, or destruction, of anything and everything which is not based in the original teachings of The Prophet and finds its most glaring practice in the policies of the Afghani Taliban or the Shiite practices of the late Ayatollah Khomeini, in Iran."
The thesis of the article is generally correct, but the blatant error in the statement above seriously impairs the writer's authority on this topic. The Wahhabis consider the Shi'ites to be just a step removed from pagans, Jews,and Crusaders. Ayatollah Khomeini was never affiliated with the Wahhabi sect of Mohammedism. Of course, the one thing that the Wahhabis and Shi'ites hate more than each other is the Great Satan USA. When convenient, the enemy of an enemy can be a friend.
To: clintonbaiter
"
A couple additional events serve as valuable footnotes to the current circumstances we face: the destruction of the human assets factor of the CIA during the Carter presidency, presided over by the late Senator Frank Church."It was really debatable whether Frank Church was actually a KGB operative or not.
"And, Jimmy Carter himself, the one man who must bear the bulk of the responsibility for setting the stage of the Third Jihad."
The story of Carter trying, unsuccessfully, to skim money off of the Shah's construction projects for the benefit of some of his buddies in Georgia (payback?) is a real stinky spot on American diplomacy.
We're told that the Shah's refusal to go along with the scheme turned Carter against him and led to his overthrow by the islamists.
To: clintonbaiter
To: clintonbaiter
There is no clash of civilizations. Radical Islam is not strong enough to threaten the West (nor is it much danger to the regimes of the Middle-East unless they decide to go democratic). The threat is the colonization of the West by third-worlders, including Muslims, and the internal traitors who sponsor it. Terrorists who set off bombs in trains and cafes are nothing more than pests. Nations won't go Islamic no matter how many bombs they set off. Nations WILL go Islamic when they have an Islamic majority, that is the threat, terrorism in the West is just a symptom.
16
posted on
05/16/2004 10:03:04 AM PDT
by
jordan8
To: lt.america
Please help me keep this bumped so others will see it.
To: clintonbaiter
...Grrreat article. Good on yer...
18
posted on
05/16/2004 11:35:17 AM PDT
by
gargoyle
To: clintonbaiter; Sabertooth; dennisw
To: clintonbaiter; FormerLib; katnip; kosta50; OrthodoxPresbyterian
Excellent read. Thank you.
Second great jihad ping.
Next year in Constantinople.
Btw, I used to hand out this article back before 911.
Muslim advance
20
posted on
05/16/2004 11:37:09 AM PDT
by
MarMema
("Hamtramck is going to be a pioneer city for the whole United States.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson