Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit

I have not yet heard a non-religious argument against civil unions. The idea is for people ot be able to make a permanent commitment to one another and to enjoy the benefits and protections the law offers two people who have chosen to do so.




I'm sorry, but "Holy Matrimoney" IS religious. Homosexuals are interfering in Christian practices, forcing their sin on Christians.

Homosexuals are FREE to make any legal arrangement they want, including "civil unions".

If homos do not want "religious referances" than they need to KEEP AWAY from religious terminology and from the Christian community.

Homosexual acts are hated by God, homos can not FORCE God or Christians to accept them-they need to keep it atheistic, anti-christ and secular where it belongs.


19 posted on 05/14/2004 6:24:24 AM PDT by Iron Matron (Those who serve two masters also have two faces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Iron Matron

agreed.


28 posted on 05/14/2004 9:06:43 AM PDT by Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit (Tax energy not labor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Iron Matron
I'm sorry, but "Holy Matrimoney" IS religious. Homosexuals are interfering in Christian practices, forcing their sin on Christians.

If "marriage", is recognized by the government, is religious in nature, then the government needs to stop recognizing it altogether.
34 posted on 05/14/2004 10:20:39 AM PDT by Dimensio (Join the Monthly Internet Flash Mob: http://tinyurl.com/3xj9m)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson