To: MineralMan
So what are the implications of this? That he was either a CIA or a terrorist spy?
To: Born in a Rage
I'm hoping he was working for our side.
62 posted on
05/13/2004 2:27:43 PM PDT by
cripplecreek
(John Kerry, the Eddie Haskell candidate.)
To: Born in a Rage
Presumably the implication is that he was an AQ spy because I hope to god a CIA spy wouldn't have sat on his hands if he knew Moussoui.
All this "yes he did!" "no he didn't!" stuff is getting really, really confusing.
To: Born in a Rage
"So what are the implications of this? That he was either a CIA or a terrorist spy?"
Could be either, or neither. He could also be a stupid dupe, who was sucked into this whole thing by being naive. I just don't know, but we're going to hear more.
76 posted on
05/13/2004 2:30:01 PM PDT by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
To: Born in a Rage
So what are the implications of this? That he was either a CIA or a terrorist spy? Or possibly Mossad. Or at least his killers thought he was
502 posted on
05/13/2004 4:33:49 PM PDT by
SauronOfMordor
(That which does not kill me had better be able to run away damn fast.)
To: Born in a Rage
What I would like to know is what the FBI hoped to achieve by leaking this information.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson