To: johnfrink
"It's a pet peeve of mine that so few journalists who write about evolution seem to understand the way that it actually works!"
Given the journalist's perspective on evolution, wouldn't it be more likely that the brutish, raping males "chose" females with finer, more delicate features which translated into a more feminine beauty being passed down to males and females alike? Aren't we told that all sex is basically rape?
25 posted on
05/12/2004 4:23:36 PM PDT by
Socratic
(Yes, there is method in the madness.)
To: Socratic
25 - You are right: "Given the journalist's perspective on evolution, wouldn't it be more likely that the brutish, raping males "chose" females with finer, more delicate features which translated into a more feminine beauty being passed down to males and females alike? Aren't we told that all sex is basically rape?"
This is just more feminist drivel written up by a metro-sexual male. Note (quote from article):
""Our research suggests that in early humans, a face that was attractive as opposed to aggressive conferred an advantage," says Eleanor Weston at the Research Institute Senckenberg in Frankfurt, a member of the team.
She says that changes were probably driven by choosy females who began to demand handsomeness, not brute force. "
55 posted on
05/12/2004 4:50:38 PM PDT by
XBob
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson