Politically-correct totalitarianism on the march in matriarchal-socialist Canada!
1 posted on
05/04/2004 9:37:03 AM PDT by
GMMAC
To: GMMAC
They may yet be prosecuted under Canada's new hate laws.
2 posted on
05/04/2004 9:46:27 AM PDT by
sgtbono2002
(I aint wrong, I aint sorry , and I am probably going to do it again.)
To: GMMAC
It gets harder each day to like, or respect Canada.
(Canada-bashing...I know)
3 posted on
05/04/2004 9:48:51 AM PDT by
laotzu
To: GMMAC
I wonder if homosexual printers are required by law to print Christian literature.
Of course not. Some animals are more equal than others in pig socialist Canada.
To: GMMAC
Wasn't it about this time last year the left was calming fears -- pre Lawrence decision -- that the Canadian court decisions on marriage wouldn't travel south? Seems like a lifetime ago. Anyone still think overturning the sodomy laws was really about privacy?
To: GMMAC
This is the danger of allowing female fascists to run a country. Not only don't these Nazi Amazons want to offend anyone, they ignite the power of the state to punish men who don't believe as they do.
Have Canadian men considered setting up a selective blockade and boycott around Toronto to slowly starve these fascist feminists into submission?
6 posted on
05/04/2004 9:55:54 AM PDT by
sergeantdave
(Gen. Custer wore an Arrowsmith shirt to his last property owner convention.)
To: GMMAC
"Politically-correct totalitarianism on the march in matriarchal-socialist Canada!"
I guess no one seems to realize that it's happening here too. It's just a matter of time before some left-wing lunatic and his fascist followers take over the government. It's not really that far-fecthed if you think about it. They already control the courts and the media, the only thing that's left is the government.
7 posted on
05/04/2004 10:02:36 AM PDT by
chronotrigger
(it's all in the biceps, baby)
To: *Homosexual Agenda; little jeremiah; scripter; GrandMoM; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; ...
8 posted on
05/04/2004 10:02:37 AM PDT by
EdReform
To: GMMAC
Canada evidently can protect a small group of perverts from public opinion, but it can't protect its population from death at the hands of terrorists.
9 posted on
05/04/2004 10:03:31 AM PDT by
Agnes Heep
(Solus cum sola non cogitabuntur orare pater noster)
To: ArGee; lentulusgracchus; Bryan; MeekOneGOP; Travis McGee; Coleus
Ping
10 posted on
05/04/2004 10:04:12 AM PDT by
EdReform
To: GMMAC
read later
To: GMMAC
Yep. And a good majority of our masses are brainwashed beyond all repair.
To: GMMAC
bump
15 posted on
05/04/2004 10:22:30 AM PDT by
lowbridge
("You are an American. You are my brother. I would die for you." -Kurdish Sergeant)
To: GMMAC
You have my sympathy. Similar rulings are cropping up in the States as well. But Canada has taken things to a whole new level for a (once) free society. When will people say "enough is enough"? And how will they say it?
20 posted on
05/04/2004 11:24:16 AM PDT by
Faraday
To: GMMAC
And in America, the people still don't get it! Even after the subpreme court canceled all states' laws against abortion as an activist court grant of societal engineering scope, while ignoring the existing evidence in federal courts that ruled the unborn to be human beings deserving of Constitutional protection, resulting in more than 40,000,000 already running human lifetimes being aborted, the American people STILL don't get it.
21 posted on
05/04/2004 11:24:20 AM PDT by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
To: GMMAC
Bump.
To: GMMAC; maica; EdReform
We're just a few years behind Canada, if "gay marriage" is upheld by the SCOTUS.
It will be a "hate crime" to oppose homosexual sex ed for grade schoolers on an equal basis with heterosexual sex ed, for example.
23 posted on
05/04/2004 12:26:36 PM PDT by
Travis McGee
(----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson