To: Joe Hadenuf
She said the reports in it may have been based on speculation - and that the Secret Service doesn't vouch for its reliability. Well, then, who maintained the log? And who reported the tape's existence and witnesses' testimony to them?
Surely, the Secret Service logkeeper wasn't simply recording flights of fancy...
6 posted on
04/19/2004 10:53:39 PM PDT by
okie01
(www.ArmorforCongress.com...because Congress isn't for the morally halt and the mentally lame.)
To: okie01
Two words appear to be missing from the end of the title: any longer.
(Puts on tinfoil hat)
7 posted on
04/19/2004 10:55:40 PM PDT by
Ingtar
(Understanding is a three-edged sword : your side, my side, and the truth in between ." -- Kosh)
To: okie01
Surely, the Secret Service logkeeper wasn't simply recording flights of fancy...Yes, I find it slightly suspect given the enormity and importance of this investigation....
Such a statement or evidence would be critical. Did they know of this log/statement, or was it revealed during the McViegh trial?
9 posted on
04/19/2004 11:04:45 PM PDT by
Joe Hadenuf
(I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson