""The log *describes* footage showing the federal building explosion, about three minutes after "suspects" exited the Ryder truck used in the blast.""
First, I didn't "state" anything: I *said* it. At least follow the most pedestrian rules of the English language if you wish to communicate with me, please.
We'll if your going to get technical and split hairs Mr. Cad, if you *said* it, how could I possibly hear it? Don't you mean you typed it? Please, if you're going to communicate with me, stop making moronic statements.
Second, I'm not interested in the least by your "curiosity" about, well, really, anything regarding this matter.
Why would you even post then? No offense, but you seem slightly deranged.
Since you failed to answer even basic questions, I would suggest you stick to those board games you speak of.
You are obviously caught up in a *007 James Bond*-type fantasy regarding this topic, wherein only you and your hardy, noble band of followers are relentlessly pursuing some vague "truth" about this event to the end.
James Bond? My noble band of followers? Man, you are a strange one.
Like many convinced conspiracy fanatics you will find constant dead-ends in this pursuit of some vague "truth" about the matter
Huh? Conspiracy fanatics? Why, because I made a comment about a Secret Service agent documenting and describing a video tape that the Secret Service now says doesn't exist? This makes me a Conspiracy fanatic?
Yeowzaa!
and it will always be just out of your verifiable reach. The sad truth all the while will be that there was no "conspiracy", of course; that the proved facts on hand will always, even years down the road, be the currently accepted version of events. But you'll keep trying; keep muttering about dark events in some shadowy never-never-land of your own creation; keep flaming posts from people who point out your obvious intellectual deficiencies regarding the topic; and so on.
I suggest you see a doctor.
Which is all fine, of course. This is a free country, after all, even for the congenitally silly. But just don't act outraged or puzzled when someone calls you on your obsessive silliness from time to time: it's a free country for those of us who aren't obsessed with neurotic fictions about historical events, too.
Again, I don't know how, after reading my few posts on this issue, you've reached these conclusions. (Obsessed neurotic fictions)??
If you are indeed responding to my posts, you need to see a doctor. I have no idea what you are talking about, or what you are referring to.