Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Voters go to the stumps in bitter Wal-Mart referendum
Yahoo! News ^ | April 6, 2004 | AFP

Posted on 04/06/2004 8:00:05 PM PDT by El Conservador

LOS ANGELES (AFP) - Voters in a southern California city went to the polls in a bitter referendum to decide if retail behemoth Wal-Mart will be allowed to override planning laws to open a giant new super-store.

Residents of the Los Angeles area city of Inglewood are sharply divided over the plan by the world's biggest retailer to build a new commercial centre in town that will be equivalent to the size of 17 football fields.

Wal-Mart, frequently the focus of rows over its intensely low-cost discount stores that are accused of destroying local business and exploiting workers, has employed a new strategy in the battle over Inglewood.

The chain has taken its plans directly to voters in a ballot initiative that could sideline local officials and allow the sprawling complex to be built without the usual traffic studies, environmental reviews and public hearings.

"There is in Inglewood today a legitimate fear -- a fear of being wiped out by a Confederate economic Trojan horse," said US politician and labour activist Reverend Jesse Jackson, who is campaigning against Wal-Mart.

"This in an international crisis wherein one globalises capital but does not globalise worker standards and health care standards, environmental standards, standards for women," he said.

The ballot measure came after Wal-Mart successfully fought efforts to keep its super-centres -- that combine low-cost department store items with groceries -- out of towns in other California cities where the chain is planning to open 40 new giant stores.

Last year, the Inglewood City Council effectively blocked Wal-Mart from moving into town, prompting the chain to navigate a course around officials by gathering about of 10,000 signatures to put the plans to a vote.

The measure needs a simple majority of its estimated 50,000 registered voters to pass.

"They will undercut (their competitors)," said Democratic Congresswoman Maxine Waters at a rally. "They will under-sell them and when they are all gone, then they will raise the prices again," she claimed.

But supporters of the plan insist that the enormous development will prove an economic boon to the depressed area of Los Angeles, creating about 1,200 jobs.

"It's important that Inglewood consumers have the same shopping that many of the neighboring communities have had for years," Wal-Mart spokesman Peter Kanelos told the Los Angeles Times.

"Wal-Mart and our customers are tired of being bullied by the unions. If the unions and the local politicians they put in office want to attack Wal-Mart, they can rest assured that we'll fight back."

Inglewood Mayor Roosevelt Dorn said the Wal-Mart, which would be part of a 60-acre retail complex, would generate three to five million dollars a year in sales tax revenues in the city of 112,000 people.

Wal-Mart's expansion in California has drawn fire from labour unions, some politicians and business owners worried about what effect the stores will have on local economies and workers' rights.

Labour groups accuse the non-unionised company of paying employees as little as half the hourly wages of union stores in order to maintain its low-cost sales. Smaller businesses have a very tough time competing with Wal-Mart.

Wal-Mart's low wages and sparse benefits for its employees were behind a nearly five-month-long strike by more than 70,000 southern Californian unionised supermarket workers.

The unionised workers were outraged by their employers' decision to reduce their health benefits in order, they said, to compete against Wal-Mart's regional onslaught.

The strike was settled in February with a two-tier system under which the stores will pay new hires less in wages and benefits than veteran workers.

The California city of Oakland, near San Francisco, last year banned Wal-Mart from its communities.

But the store has overcome opposition by officials in other cities, including Contra Costa and Calexico on the Mexican border, by getting voters to repeal prohibitive ordinances.

Wal-Mart operates more than 3,000 stores with more than 1.2 million workers across the United States.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; communists; environment; inglewood; inglewoodwalmart; jesse; jessejackson; propertyrights; walmart
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-162 next last
"There is in Inglewood today a legitimate fear -- a fear of being wiped out by a Confederate economic Trojan horse," said US politician and labour activist Reverend Jesse Jackson, who is campaigning against Wal-Mart.

Poverty pimping. Race pimping. Ahh, the joys of being Je$$e Jack$on.

1 posted on 04/06/2004 8:00:05 PM PDT by El Conservador
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All


Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!


2 posted on 04/06/2004 8:01:09 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (If Woody had gone straight to the police, this would never have happened!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Conservador
"They will undercut (their competitors)," said Democratic Congresswoman Maxine Waters at a rally. "They will under-sell them and when they are all gone, then they will raise the prices again," she claimed.

This never happens, but the skank Waters never let truth get in the way of her bullshit.

3 posted on 04/06/2004 8:04:36 PM PDT by sinkspur (Adopt a dog or a cat from an animal shelter! It will save one life, and may save two.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Conservador
"There is in Inglewood today a legitimate fear -- a fear of being wiped out by a Confederate economic Trojan horse," said US politician and labour activist Reverend Jesse Jackson, who is campaigning against Wal-Mart.

Confederate, eh? Jeezus, why isn't Jesse home raising his bastard child?

America's Fifth Column ... watch PBS documentary JIHAD! In America
http://12thman.us/media/jihad.rm (Requires RealPlayer)

Who is Steve Emerson?

4 posted on 04/06/2004 8:09:09 PM PDT by JCG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JCG
Now, where all those Wal-Mart bashers now that Jesse is on their side? LOL
5 posted on 04/06/2004 8:16:17 PM PDT by Conservababe (Kerry, you said to "bring it on". We are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JCG
Guess the jackson side of the daley mob wanted to move to inglewood?
6 posted on 04/06/2004 8:20:55 PM PDT by dts32041 ("Give me a break. I'm a male, my ESP doesn't work." 05 APR 04 Mondoman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: El Conservador
This is just incredible to me! This must be the workings of the powerful union bosses whom Jessie and that skank Waters owe their souls to.
7 posted on 04/06/2004 8:22:29 PM PDT by ladyinred (Anger the left! Become a MONTHLY DONOR to FreeRepublic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Conservador
This is a very shallow article. There is a whole lot more to the issue than the Unions.

NY Times article: Stymied by Politicians, Wal-Mart Turns to Voters (FR Link)

While Wal-Mart has turned to the ballot in a number of cities and towns to win the right to build its giant emporiums, the Inglewood initiative is significantly different. The proposal would essentially exempt Wal-Mart from all of Inglewood's planning, zoning and environmental regulations, creating a city-within-a-city subject only to its own rules. Wal-Mart has hired an advertising and public relations firm to market the initiative and is spending more than $1 million to support the measure, known as initiative 04-A.

8 posted on 04/06/2004 8:49:11 PM PDT by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
And your point is . . . ? Don't be shy, we're all friends here.
9 posted on 04/06/2004 8:58:42 PM PDT by rebel_yell2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rebel_yell2
And your point is . . . ?

Should Wal-Mart be exempt from the laws their competitors have to follow and the other businesses in Inglewood?

I'm not saying they are good laws... but why should Wal-Mart get a pass?

10 posted on 04/06/2004 9:05:35 PM PDT by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: El Conservador
"There is in Inglewood today a legitimate fear -- a fear of being wiped out by a Confederate economic Trojan horse," said US politician and labour activist Reverend Jesse Jackson, who is campaigning against Wal-Mart.

Ahhh... I wondered where the good reverend had gotten off to.

Labour activist my ass, Je$$e's just a shucking jiving scam and shakedown artist. Slimy is his middle name.

11 posted on 04/06/2004 9:10:49 PM PDT by upchuck (Pay attention!! This tagline changes on an irregular schedule and without prior warning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Conservador
Bump!
12 posted on 04/06/2004 9:40:15 PM PDT by Budge (<><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservababe
I'm not a big fan of Walmart. I do believe in free enterprise, but there are times when something gets so big, that it can turn into a pariah. I think Walmart is just that.

Walmart is indeed a boon to the communities it comes to. In other ways it is a blood-sucking pariah. Yes Walmart does bring in new jobs. Walmart also closes a lot of local businesses when it comes to town.

Walmart does not privide decent wages or decent benefits to it's employees. Yes folks do clammer to work there, but out of work people will often clammer to work when they haven't been in a while.

In this instance Walmart seeks to do an end run on local zoning laws. Some of those laws are terrible IMO, but local community leaders do have the right to zone their communities as they see fit. Walmart shouldn't be able to avoid those zoning laws any more than anyone else can.

Look, we all know Jessie Jackson and this Waters clownnette are full of race baiting banther fodder. Most of the rhetoric they spew will miss valid points with regard to Walmart. So what. Walmart is still a pariah.

As for unions and their special interest tripe, it's nothing more than special interest manipulations. They'd be complaining if any business came in without going union.

While some of you may think I'm wrong with regard to Walmart, and I acknowledge some of your arguements appeal to me on a certain level, I think Walmart is basicly evil. I believe they make loads of money on the backs of people who are not adequately complensated hourly or by benefits. I think that is wrong.

Look, none of us backs the idea of $30 dollar an hour union employees ruling the roost. On the other end, I don't approve of minimum wages or close to it for Walmart employees either. When it comes to medical and vactation packages, I think large businesses should provide these things to loyal workers who help make a business successful.
13 posted on 04/06/2004 10:05:17 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
They will undercut (their competitors)," said Democratic Congresswoman Maxine Waters at a rally. "They will under-sell them and when they are all gone, then they will raise the prices again," she claimed.

That's right. And the thing is, by the time they start raising their prices, the owners of all the competitor stores, as well as all their employees, will be dead. And with them will die all knowledge of how to operate a retail outlet, leaving only Wal-Mart in control. Just as they have planned from the beginning.

(steely)

14 posted on 04/06/2004 10:05:33 PM PDT by Steely Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Conservababe
Looks like Jesse is going after former Wal-Mart Board Member Hillary R. Clinton.
15 posted on 04/06/2004 10:10:17 PM PDT by pete anderson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Do you run Microsoft on your computer? Just curious.
16 posted on 04/06/2004 10:29:13 PM PDT by Conservababe (Kerry, you said to "bring it on". We are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Conservababe
I do. I imagine you see certain similarities between microsoft and Wallmart. I see very few.

Microsoft has grown very large. And in some ways it too is pariahist, but I do not see it in the same light as Wallmart by any means.

Microsoft has made a ton of money for it's top dog. It's also made a ton of money for Microsoft emploees and stockholders. Wallmart has that later, it certainly hasn't made it's employees much.

Microsoft has tried to control things in it's arena. It has been agressive. I would say it has been too agressive, but then it has dominated it's field as few business entities have. I would say that a good portion of this is due to it's success.

Look, we could say the same thing about Walmart. Where I have an incredible beef with Walmart is it's treatment of it's employees. Read around about the relationship Walmart has with it's employees as well as what happens to regional townships where Walmart pulls up it's roots and relocates. It basicly destroys the local economy.

On it's way in it kills business. Then when it leaves nothing is left.

I believe the courts are keeping Microsoft in check. On some points I agree with this, and on some points I don't.
17 posted on 04/06/2004 10:40:20 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Walmart is indeed a boon to the communities it comes to. In other ways it is a blood-sucking pariah. Yes Walmart does bring in new jobs. Walmart also closes a lot of local businesses when it comes to town.

Those local businesses close because consumers freely choose Walmart over the mom-and-pops. Why should the interests of local businesses be more important than the interests of consumers?

18 posted on 04/06/2004 10:42:33 PM PDT by timm22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Good Post DoughtyOne, I agree 99%.

Update for all:

Inglewood Voters Rejecting Wal-Mart
Bid by the retailer to bypass environmental review and public hearings is opposed nearly 2-to-1 with all but two precincts counted.

LA Times, April 7, 2004, 10:34 PM

A bid by the world's largest corporation to bypass uncooperative elected officials and take its aggressive expansion plans to voters appeared headed for failure Tuesday, as vote results showed Inglewood residents rejecting Wal-Mart's proposal to build a colossal retail and grocery center without the environmental review or public hearings.

With all but two of the precincts counted Tuesday evening, 2,674 Inglewood residents had voted in favor of Wal-Mart's plan, while 5,108 had voted against it. About 3,000 absentee votes had yet to be counted.


19 posted on 04/06/2004 10:44:00 PM PDT by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom
And with them will die all knowledge of how to operate a retail outlet, leaving only Wal-Mart in control. Just as they have planned from the beginning.

So what's to stop to someone from simply adopting the Wal-Mart model of operating a retail outlet? If Wal-Mart starts "price-gouging," someone else can come in and undercut them just as Wal-Mart supposedly undercuts local businesses.

20 posted on 04/06/2004 10:46:01 PM PDT by timm22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-162 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson