Posted on 03/31/2004 1:25:55 PM PST by Land_of_Lincoln_John
Famous financier and philanthropist George Soros was poured with glue and water at the conference "Human Rights at Elections" in Kiev.
Two young people came into the conference room and poured the panel members (including George Soros) with glue and water. They were shouting, "Long live to "Brotherhood!" (Ukrainian nationalistic movement) and "Soros, leave Ukraine, your plans will fail!"
Earlier, one of the young men tried to engage the conference participants in fight.
Policemen drove the two men out of the conference room. The incident postponed the beginning of the conference by 15 minutes.
"This is not just an accident, somebody planned this", said George Soros. However, he failed to name the incident organizers.
Simultaneously, the demonstration of opposition started in Kiev. 12 thousands supporters of "Our Ukraine" movement were going through downtown Kiev and demanding to increase salaries of public sector workers. This demonstration was part of the launched presidential election campaign. Ukrainian opposition wanted its sponsor to see its activity.
After NATO expansion Ukraine became the border state where the interests of Russia and the West are confronting. In this respect the presidential elections in October 2004 are very important. There are two leading candidates to become successors of President Kuchma - Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovich and the leader of "Our Ukraine" movement Vladimir Yushenko supported by the West.
US politicians from the Democratic Party are paying special attention to Ukraine. A month ago former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright visited Kiev. On March 29 George Soros arrived in Ukraine.
Mr. Soros is known not only for his charity activity, but also as being a powerful and persistent politician. His attitude to the current US administration is so bad that he is ready to spend any money to overthrow President Bush. While waiting for his chance, the oligarch is training on smaller countries.
After landing in the Crimea, George Soros said he was surprised that Ukrainian authorities did not give him a warm welcome. He said that he was not going to make a revolution, like in Georgia, he was just promoting the idea of free, honest and fair presidential elections in the Ukraine. The official purpose of his trip is attending the conference "Human Rights at Elections" where more than one hundred human rights organizations participate.
A week ago the generous philanthropist said that he was ready to pay salaries to the entire Georgian government under the excuse of eradicating corruption in that country. Probably, George Soros came to Ukraine to learn if he could support financially Ukrainian government as well.
By visiting Ukraine, George Soros gave the start to the presidential election campaign in this country. Soros and the politicians close to him demonstrated their intention to conduct one more "velvet revolution". Ukrainian authorities frustrated the oligarch a little by ruining his expensive suit. Russia is the next to act. If Russia keeps silence, "velvet revolution" in Ukraine is inevitable. We can have one more "velvet state" on our border, and its government will get their salaries from Soros.
No, I did not at all. I said "like so many Russians," not "as many Russians."
Also, living in Russia helps but does not replace education. That seems to be a tendency: in your arguments, you refer to personal experiences. Someone in your educational chain betrayed you and hid the most important point: education is what supplants your personal experiences, and not all learning is experiential.
I can't accept that freepers believe this. But, a few years ago I thought I would fall over while at the Puyallup fair here in Washington. We stopped at an Islam Information booth and listened to a raving idiot tell us that the Jews flew the planes into the WTC, and more. It is more than frightening to think that these people live right here within driving distance of my home. So I know you are correct about this one.
For me it is all experiential. Education such as the liberals supply in the public skools here is more properly labeled contamination.
I refer to personal experiences because that is what I can honestly speak of and does not paint a broad brush on anyone or generalize. No one can speak of much else in the long run except either their personal experiences, their beliefs, or their opinion/perception.
Just like those muslims in my above story. When I tried to point out to them that people called from the planes and gave seat information about the perps of 911 ( so we know they were not Jewish), his response was that this was what was reported on Tv and Tv is run by the Jewish people.
William Flax Return Of The Gods Web Site
Remember, if a Republican businessman did this kind of thing, the liberals would all be squawking loudly about "imperialistic multinational corporations".
Right. . .and when Condi Rice was asked about it; she looked like she never even heard of 'the Ukraine'. . .
. . .he would be the 'real' King; Kerry the 'pretender'.
Sounds from his job description, Soros is really a 'soldier of fortune'. . .
socialism, fascism, pacifism, totalitarianism, anarchism, government enforced atheism, abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, racism, wacko environmentalism, judicial activism, etc.
What do these have to do with nationalism?
We also oppose the United Nations or any other world government body that may attempt to impose its will or rule over our sovereign nation and sovereign people. That is nationalism, and as you can see there is nothing bigoted about it.
Not all nationalism is bigotry, but it often provides a warm hiding place to such. A nationalist is for sovereignty of his or her own country. In that sense, I completely agree with Jim's statement.
Now, when someone starts insisting on purety of blood and/or religion in the state --- that's what I was refferting to and that is altogether different story.
We believe in defending our borders, our constitution and our national sovereignty.
Exactly right. And we are not doing enough of that.
Education such as the liberals supply in the public skools here is more properly labeled contamination.
In this sentence you confuse education with a system of education. If the system does not provide it for you, and it does not, you should provide it for yourself.
Now, when they come to power, close the libraries and start burning books -- then you have an excuse.
Yeh, those d-mn Joooos: trying to usurp the globe. You keep a good company.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.