Skip to comments.
Poll: Clarke Doubted; Bush Support Ebbs (65% say Clarke didn't change their view of Bush)
ABC 7 ^
| March 27, 2004
| AP
Posted on 03/27/2004 6:03:34 PM PST by FairOpinion
Washington (AP) - Two-thirds of Americans say the testimony of Richard Clarke, the former terrorism adviser who has been critical of the Bush administration, hasn't affected their view of the president, says a poll released Saturday.
However, public views supporting President Bush (website - news - bio) 's handling of terrorism have dipped from 65 percent to 57 percent in the last month, according to the Newsweek poll. That drop comes at a time the commission investigating the Sept. 11 terror attacks has been publicly questioning officials in the Bush and Clinton administrations about their handling of the terror threat.
The Bush campaign has placed his handling of the campaign against terrorism - his strongest issue - at the heart of his re-election bid.
Clarke left the Bush administration in early 2003, and has criticized the president for his handling of terrorism in a new book, numerous interviews and testimony before the Sept. 11 commission.
Half those surveyed in the poll after Clarke's testimony Wednesday said they thought he was acting for political and personal reasons, while a quarter said they feel he's acting as a dedicated public servant.
Two-thirds said the Clinton administration did not take the threat of terror seriously enough, while six in 10 said the Bush administration has taken the threat as seriously as it should.
The poll found the presidential race between Bush and Democrat John Kerry (website - news - bio) tied and found Bush's job approval was 49 percent.
The poll of 1,002 adults was taken Thursday and Friday and has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.
TOPICS: Front Page News
KEYWORDS: 911commission; newsweak; poll; richardclarke
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 last
To: YoSoy2
"we need to kill them by the hundreds if we want to make a dent on terror."
==
We have been -- I think I heard a 5000 figure at some point -- that many AQ are dead or captured. (This is not the same as the 2/3 figure of the top leadership, that is probably in dozens -- this is actual AQ members.)
41
posted on
03/27/2004 9:45:50 PM PST
by
FairOpinion
(Zell Miller (D):"I’m on George Bush’s side because he’s on the side of the American people.")
To: FairOpinion
I'd like to see the questions and the demographics. 65% not changing their view doesn't mean anything. The 35% who did change their view could be meaningful information if one knew what their view was to start with.
42
posted on
03/27/2004 9:53:48 PM PST
by
templar
To: templar
Has what Clarke said about Bush made you feel more favorably toward Bush or less favorably toward Bush, or hasn't it made much difference either way?
More favorable 10%
Less favorable 17%
Not much different either way 65%
Don't know 8%
43
posted on
03/27/2004 10:02:38 PM PST
by
FairOpinion
(Zell Miller (D):"I’m on George Bush’s side because he’s on the side of the American people.")
To: FairOpinion
True, but the Newsweek poll shows that the coercive effect of Clark's media blitz had a measurable effect upon the sheeple. A certain percentage of folks out there in TV land seem to be affected by negative stories, with little to no reflective thought on their part.
44
posted on
03/27/2004 11:18:42 PM PST
by
My2Cents
("Well...there you go again.")
To: mrsmith
I think that the attacks in Spain highlighted the continued reality of the terrorist threat upon the west. A few weeks ago, about 10% of the people said that terrorism was the #1 issue. I haven't seen a poll on this since the Spain bombings, but I'd bet that terrorism as an issue has once again risen in the minds of Ameicans.
45
posted on
03/27/2004 11:23:09 PM PST
by
My2Cents
("Well...there you go again.")
To: My2Cents
"coercive effect of Clark's media blitz had a measurable effect upon the sheeple."
===
I agree -- I think that's why it's crucial that the Bush team immediately respond and debunk the Dems lies. I wish they had started about a year ago -- but at least they are awake now.
46
posted on
03/27/2004 11:27:05 PM PST
by
FairOpinion
(Zell Miller (D):"I’m on George Bush’s side because he’s on the side of the American people.")
To: FairOpinion
Interesting when you compare the Newsweek numbers with the msnbc numbers....Freepers have been caught sleeping with this MSNBC poll...
47
posted on
03/28/2004 5:00:07 AM PST
by
mdmathis6
(The Democrats must be defeated in 2004...." MDMATHIS6, The Anti-Democrat")
To: FairOpinion
bookmark bump
48
posted on
03/28/2004 5:46:56 AM PST
by
lepton
To: FairOpinion
"However, public views supporting President Bush (website - news - bio) 's handling of terrorism have dipped from 65 percent to 57 percent in the last month,"
Tell a lie often enough and it seems true. Democrats will win if Bush allows this team of democrats to place him constantly on the defensive. He better not morph into his daddy when the heat is on.
Where is Karen when you need her?
To: FairOpinion
Bad guys still winning - but consider the venue. I freeped anyway.
50
posted on
03/28/2004 11:51:28 AM PST
by
talleyman
(Wimpy tag line? Try Vi-tag-ra!)
To: FairOpinion
Man, talk about being in the belly of the beast over at Newsweak...
51
posted on
03/28/2004 11:54:57 AM PST
by
talleyman
(Wimpy tag line? Try Vi-tag-ra!)
To: FairOpinion
Yeah, the Bush Adm. should have been working to inoculate the public against the spin and lies of the Dems. I know they don't want to politicize the War on Terror, but let's face it...it's politicized already.
I love W, but my one pet peeve is that he and the Administration have not been very public about their victories in this war. We who follow the news religiously are aware, but Joe Sixpack out there isn't. Frankly, I'd like to hear some of the victories we've had in thwarting attacks on this nation; you know there have been victories, but because of "security" concerns or a concern about not panicking people, they've not been public about it. Consequently, whenever the terrorist threat level is bumped up a notch, it results in people laughing about it. I bet this nation has come close to other terror attacks, but they haven't been announced. I think the Adm. should be letting the public know how close we've come to other hits. Scare the bejeebers out of folks...as far as I'm concerned, that's fine. It may wake people up to the fact that this Administration has been vigilant and effective, and it would also wake people up that we need to keep this Administration in office.
The other thing I have a hunch about is that the Defense Dept. and our intelligence agencies probably have some pretty solid evidence about the fate of Iraq's WMD, and Saddam's ties to al-Qaeda, but again, they're keeping the information close to the vest. Frankly, this is more than a hunch, because all one needs to do is a Google search of "Saddam and terrorism" and see what's publicly known, or read David Kay's interim report to the CIA from last October on the WMD issue.
In sum, I think the Administration has done a horrible job promoting it's own successes in the War on Terror.
52
posted on
03/28/2004 1:58:04 PM PST
by
My2Cents
("Well...there you go again.")
To: My2Cents
"In sum, I think the Administration has done a horrible job promoting it's own successes in the War on Terror."
===
I agree with you 100%, and share the same frustration. They way overestimated the decency of the Democrats, and underestimated the ignorance of the American people.
Even when the Dems were making it very clear over the last year, that they are willing to sacrifice national security for politica gain, the Bush administration didn't fight back.
We can't go back in time, I am glad to see that they are finally doing it now, but I think they should amplify it about ten fold, keep up the defense, but also need to go on offensive, tell people about their successes and point out what things were like and would be like under Kerry.
53
posted on
03/28/2004 2:42:34 PM PST
by
FairOpinion
(Zell Miller (D):"I’m on George Bush’s side because he’s on the side of the American people.")
To: FairOpinion
Yes, it's a miracle that Bush is either in a statistical tie with Kerry, or slightly ahead in most polls. I've read that W learned at the feet of Lee Atwater during the '88 campaign for "H.W.", so I have hope they'll start hitting back harder.
54
posted on
03/28/2004 3:36:09 PM PST
by
My2Cents
("Well...there you go again.")
To: syriacus
clarke is the one who failed.That's been my thinking all along. He is not so dumb that he did not realize that one day history will show him as a key figure in the failure to protect our country.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson