Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Navy Sues Civilian for Return of Wrecked World War II Plane He Salvaged From Swamp
Associated Press ^ | 03/27/2004 | Associated Press

Posted on 03/27/2004 4:24:34 PM PST by tomball

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: Geist Krieger
Remember post surrender of Japan, the footage of the navy just pushing Corsairs and Mustangs overboard into the ocean.............Just cleaning house ya know.........
21 posted on 03/27/2004 4:58:38 PM PST by blackdog (I feed the sheep the coyotes eat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind
As I understand it, Brewster was the only US aircraft company to go out of business during WW-II.

Brewster designed and built the Brewster Buffalo fighter. That should have been enough to put any aircraft builder out of business.

22 posted on 03/27/2004 4:59:20 PM PST by epow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: x1stcav
The Finns also bought many Brewster Buffaloes (Navy designation F2A). They took them, removed the Navy-mandated pilot armor and other heavy items, and actually turned what the Navy thought was a POS into a fairly capable (if still slow and obsolete) little fighter. They took it up against the Red Air Force in the 1939-40 Winter War and the 1941-44 "Continuation War." (There were Finnish aces that scored over 40 kills with the Buffalo!) The Dutch also got some decent service out of them. The Navy versions were slaughtered very early in the war around Java and quickly retired; they were slow, underpowered, and overweight, and quickly dumped in favor of the Grumman F4F Wildcat.

I'd never even heard of an F3A before this, didn't even know that Brewster license-built the Corsair. But it makes sense; Goodyear also license-built versions of the Corsair, which were designated F2G. Lots of manufacturers built each others' aircraft in WWII; Lockheed built many Boeing B-17s, Ford built Consolidated B-24s.

}:-)4
23 posted on 03/27/2004 5:02:58 PM PST by Moose4 (This is not a "war of ideas." It is a war of life and death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: blackdog
Yep. I heard a story that a carrier was sailing to the Pacific carrying a shipment of Corsairs for the British Fleet Air Arm, when Japan surrendered. The Brits signalled that they didn't need the Corsairs any more since the war was over. Obviously, Chance-Vought wasn't going to take them back. So, over the side they went.

It's almost scary to look at the sheer numbers of aircraft we built in WWII--over 10,000 P-47s, over 15,000 B-24s--and realize how few are left flying. But it could be worse--Germany built over 30,000 Messerschmitt Bf 109s, and there isn't a single one left flying with its original Daimler Benz engine. The only flyable ones today are using (irony of ironies) Rolls Royce Merlins. The last Daimler-engined 109 crashed in England a few years ago and will not be restored to flying condition.

}:-)4
24 posted on 03/27/2004 5:06:12 PM PST by Moose4 (This is not a "war of ideas." It is a war of life and death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: x1stcav
Isn't this the Brewster "Buffalo"?

No, this is the Corsair. The Buffalo was an earlier plane. Chance-Vought was the primary manufacturer for the Corsair, with Brewster and Goodyear providing additional assembly lines to produce them.

25 posted on 03/27/2004 5:08:06 PM PST by KarlInOhio (Bill Clinton is the Neville Chamberlain of the War on Terror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: x1stcav
Actually, they were famous (or infamous) for the Brewster Buffalo. It is generally agreed that the Buffalo was the worst fighter in WWII. You may be thinking of the Finns who were reasonably successful with the Buffalo against the Russians. Considering they had nothing else, there was not a whole lot to measure it against.

However, the Brewster plant did try to build Corsairs under license since Vought could not produce them fast enough. Unfortunately, neither could Brewster. They built a total of 735 of them before the Navy closed the plant by yanking the contract (this episode is usually described as "closed the badly managed Brewster plant" in most histories). Interestingly, the workforce at Brewster held a strike after the plant was closed down. I don't know exactly what they were striking for, but production did not start up afterward, so I think they lost.

430 of the Brewster Corsairs were given to the British. The remainder were used for training in the US. None were used in combat. That tells me a whole lot about the quality of the workmanship. It also tells me that complaints from the British that we only gave them junk during WWII have some basis in truth.
26 posted on 03/27/2004 5:11:10 PM PST by jim_trent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: tomball
Like what is the Navy going to do with this plane?? Sell it on E-bay to the Canadian Forces to modernize their air fleet??? Perhaps this plane will be the backbone of Naval aviation under a Kerry administration.
27 posted on 03/27/2004 5:12:03 PM PST by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
G Gordon Liddy talked about a lawsuit that involved a cotton gin made in the 1800's. The gin when not needed went to the scrap heap, then it became a mooring for a decade or two, back to the scrap heap and then as a counter balance in a factory. While used as a counter balance it fell from it's chain and injured a man. The lawyers found a small plaque on the gin stating the original company. Turned out a subsidiary of the company was still in business and the lawsuit went through!

I think the swamp owner has a case.

Our government paid for the the storage of Helium in case the dirigible might come back for over 60 years. (clintoon stopped it. One good mark on his record.) This would be just a pittance comparatively
28 posted on 03/27/2004 5:12:24 PM PST by lizma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Viking2002
Another case of pencil-pushers with more power than brains, looking for a way to justify their paycheck......

You have just touched on the very essence of bureaucratic life in Washington DC.

29 posted on 03/27/2004 5:15:42 PM PST by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tomball
Unfortunately the Navy has a long history of this sort of B.S.

Just ask Clive Cussler; he and his non-profit shipwreck hunting team have been on the recieving end of this sort of chrome plated crap. Read 'The Sea Hunters' for an illuminating look at the Navy's arrogance with regards to salvage rights.

Sometimes I think they should just fly the Jolly Roger from their ships.

30 posted on 03/27/2004 5:17:00 PM PST by CarryaBigStick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CarryaBigStick
i after e except after c - AARRG!
31 posted on 03/27/2004 5:18:27 PM PST by CarryaBigStick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: CarryaBigStick
Hell, it's enough to make a man hide whatever he finds.

A decade or so ago they sued a man who inherited a vial of moon dust his dad scrubbed off an Apollo EVA suit. Not sure how it turned out.
32 posted on 03/27/2004 5:20:37 PM PST by Bogey78O (I voted for this tagline... before I voted against it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ
Actually, they're stealing it from this poor guy to put it into the Navy museum. It's a precedent that's already been set.
33 posted on 03/27/2004 5:23:44 PM PST by CarryaBigStick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: tomball
This is strictly a USN-driven issue, and it has been their standard policy for some time. If the guy had found a P-47, the U.S. Army (or Air Force) would be more likely to give the guy a pat on the back, wish him luck, let him pump money into the economy, and save the taxpayers a couple of bucks in the bargain.
34 posted on 03/27/2004 5:28:17 PM PST by niteowl77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O
Maritime law says a wrecked warship is forever the property of the nation that employed it. No one else has any right to salvage it. I don't know if this covers aircraft, though it does set precedents.
35 posted on 03/27/2004 5:33:02 PM PST by Junior (No animals were harmed in the making of this post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O
"If the gov't abandons property why should they come back 50 yrs later and cite a claim on it?"

They didn't abandon it, they just left it for safekeeping. Actually, they'll probably say something like that. US government property is not lost or abandoned, it is unsecured.

A few years ago, they wanted to pass a law to reclaim every piece of government property ever sold at auction, too. They were specifically interested in recovering weapons and weapons system parts, but the law was broadly written enough that it covered gov't surplus canteens and such, too. All those old civil-war weapons with US markings, etc., too. EVERYTHING. Even if you still had the reciept to show you bought if FROM the government.
36 posted on 03/27/2004 5:40:37 PM PST by Old Student (WRM, MSgt, USAF (Ret.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lizma
"Our government paid for the the storage of Helium in case the dirigible might come back for over 60 years. (clintoon stopped it. One good mark on his record.) This would be just a pittance comparatively"



Of course now that hes stopped the helium stockpiling, were once again talking about deploying large airships high in the atmosphere for missile defense.
37 posted on 03/27/2004 5:58:42 PM PST by Oblongata
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
At first I thought it was the "Buffalo as well

Turns out the Navy appointed two subcontractors to speed Corsair production. Brewster Aeronautical Corporation produced versions of the F4U-1 and F4U-1D, which were designated F3A-1 and F3A-1D respectively.

Brewster built about 700 Corsairs, but there were severe quality control problems which then made the F3A too dangerous to fly and almost all F3As were grounded. Brewster spent time in court then went out of business.

38 posted on 03/27/2004 6:04:10 PM PST by VRWCTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Moose4
"But it makes sense; Goodyear also license-built versions of the Corsair, which were designated F2G. Lots of manufacturers built each others' aircraft in WWII; Lockheed built many Boeing B-17s, Ford built Consolidated B-24s."

Back in the 70's when I did contract work for the DOD, I worked on an RB-57 Canberra that had Buick jet engines on it.
39 posted on 03/27/2004 6:07:06 PM PST by chaosagent (It's not the fall that kills you. It's the sudden stop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Starboard
Hey, I'm hip - lived there for 15 years, and was a military/guvmint contractor for a lot of it. I saw the rot festering from the inside.
40 posted on 03/27/2004 6:20:17 PM PST by Viking2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson