Skip to comments.
DEMOCRACY OR ISLAMOCRACY
Iran Press Service ^
| Dr. Mehdi Mozaffari
Posted on 03/27/2004 1:18:31 AM PST by F14 Pilot
PARIS 26, Mar. (IPS) "It is astonishing that each time claims on freedom of speech, free elections and gender equality strongly arises, Arab and Muslim leaders immediately resort to counter attacks, considering these claims to be in contradiction with their culture and identity. What they are saying is actually that despotism and repression is more conform to Islamic and Arab values than democracy and liberty", according to an Iranian scholar in Denmark.
In an article carried out on Thursday by the Paris-based "Iran va Jahan" (Iran and the World) internet news service, Dr. Mehdi Mozzaffari of the Aarhus University of Copenhagen counters despotic leaders in the Arab Middle East and Muslim world arguing that democracy should not be imposed from the outside, saying "If demands for change come from the outside, it is because nothing has been done in this direction by Middle Eastern autocrats who have been holding on to power for decades".
"Instead of a Philadelphian inspired democracy, they (Arab and Muslim leaders) are looking for "Islamocracy", or Islam and democracy. "Islamic democracy" as president (Mohammad) Khatami of Iran formulated it means selection instead of election, a parliament without real attributes, a judiciary without independence, political parties without liberty, and mass communication without a voice", he pointed out. It is of common knowledge that democracy cannot be established in one day. But, one day, the process of democratisation must begin. This day has now arrived to the Middle East. Middle Eastern societies are facing a painful, dramatic and decisive choice between democracy and Islamocracy. It is not that the Middle East is a particularly fertile terrain for democracy, but rather because democracy is a necessity.
Currently, the Islamic world is producing Oil, Terrorism and Emigration. This "Islamic Bermuda Triangle" represents a major challenge to the world. Until recently, a combination of oil and despotism was tolerated and even supported by western powers; particularly by the USA. The global terrorism, the perpetual waves of emigration, the attempts to access nuclear weapons, and the propagation of Islamism as a new totalitarian ideology which is claiming the conquest of the world by all means is too much to be ignored.
Unfortunately, it is illusory to think that the change in Muslim societies will come from within, alone. Four interrelated factors are hindering a successful internal and autonomous change: Oriental despotism, the rentier economy, the domination of Islam, and external interventionism. These elements constitute a Gordian knot that can only be cut off by Alexander's sword.
The USA's intervention in both Afghanistan and Iraq must be understood as an imperative chirurgical intervention to break this vicious chain. American plans to democratise the "Greater Middle East" are also a proposed remedy to the agony of Muslims.
During decades, Americans have been strongly criticized for their support to dictatorial regimes. Now, when Americans are firmly demonstrating their will for democratisation of the Middle East, they are again accused being too ambitious, too naïve and hypocritical! In this respect, Professor Amitai Etzioni refers to the Bush Administrations plan as an "American Fantasy" (International Herald Tribune of 5 March 2004).
The fantasy is rather to await the process of democratisation to start by itself and to progress slowly, gently and peacefully from within the Middle Eastern societies. It is not so much because demands for democracy, justice and humanity are absent from the Middle Eastern arena. Forces for democracy in this region are under an organized, systematic and deep going repression.
American plans cannot make miracles. Nevertheless, they do make a difference and they have especially changed the agenda. Already the paradigm has changed in the Middle East. For the first time in history, democracy figures on the agenda. Dynamism is going to replace stagnation and brutality gives place for dialogue. This is not a fantasy; it is a fact and it is real. The constitution of Afghanistan is now in place. The transitory constitution of Iraq is signed. Of course it is not fully conformed to Max Weber's ideal type of democracy; but there is no doubt that it will be moving in this direction.
The new wave of democratisation is so strong that Arab and Muslim autocrats are trembling. In the name of national, cultural and religious identity, president Mubarak of Egypt together with president Assad of Syria and the Saudi family tries to build up a 'Refusal front'.
It is astonishing that each time claims on freedom of speech, free elections and gender equality strongly arises, Arab and Muslim leaders immediately resort to counter attacks, considering these claims to be in contradiction with their culture and identity. What they are saying is actually that despotism and repression is more conform to Islamic and Arab values than democracy and liberty! They also argue that democracy should not be imposed from the outside.
If demands for change come from the outside, it is because nothing has been done in this direction by Middle Eastern autocrats who have been holding on to power for decades. Instead of a Philadelphian inspired democracy, they are looking for Islamocracy. Islamocracy or 'Islamic democracy' as president Khatami of Iran formulated it means selection instead of election, a parliament without real attributes, a judiciary without independence, political parties without liberty, and mass communication without a voice.
The time for Islamocracy is over and the waves of democratisation have finally reached the shores of the wider Middle East. Max Weber would be delighted to witness the result of this historical experience.
Editores note : Dr. Mehdi Mozaffari is a professor of political science at the University of Aarhus - Denmark. His recent book is Globalization and Civilizations" (ed.), Routledge, 2002. Also, by Professor Mozaffari:How To Combat Islamist Terrorism Without Combating Islam?
The above article was also published by "Iran va Jahan" on 25 March 2004
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: arabworld; democracy; iran; iraq; islam; islamocracy; me; mullahs; rebuildingiraq; terrorism; theocracy; usa; utopia
1
posted on
03/27/2004 1:18:32 AM PST
by
F14 Pilot
To: DoctorZIn; McGavin999; freedom44; nuconvert; Eala; AdmSmith; dixiechick2000; onyx; Pro-Bush; ...
2
posted on
03/27/2004 1:19:40 AM PST
by
F14 Pilot
(John Fedayeen Kerry - the Mullahs' regime candidate)
To: F14 Pilot
Excellent article! BUMP
3
posted on
03/27/2004 1:22:46 AM PST
by
XHogPilot
To: F14 Pilot
Bookmark
4
posted on
03/27/2004 1:32:37 AM PST
by
spodefly
(A tagline is a terrible thing to waste.)
To: F14 Pilot
Thanks F14 Pilot - excellent post. That F14 must have been a rush!
It seems to me that many don't understand the long term strategic reasons for our actions in Iraq. We either have to effect a major change in the Middle East mind set or put up with never ending and more violent attacks.
It seems an impossible task, but the alternative is to be forced to kill off many of their brain washed generations, and possible see many more of ours folks die . At this point, it could go either way - this presidential election is so important, as we must stay the course, for many more years. We must have a long term Iraq presence, for many more years.
We should support the Bush Administration approach as the appeasement and indecisive approaches will ultimately result in much worse out of the Middle East. Say what you mean and do what you say.
5
posted on
03/27/2004 4:03:31 AM PST
by
RAY
(Right or wrong, it is my country!)
To: RAY
It seems an impossible task...Not nearly as impossible as the nay-sayers paint it. Most Moslems already live in democracies, and the shift to democracy among Arabs is already underway.
This is a key point of the Bush doctrine that many seem to overlook-- that America is now spreading democracy, instead of just providing an example. We're doing it and we're winning, a fact that the bush-bashers continue to 'misunderestimate'.
To: F14 Pilot; MJY1288; xzins; Calpernia; TEXOKIE; Alamo-Girl; windchime; Grampa Dave; ...
If demands for change come from the outside, it is because nothing has been done in this direction by Middle Eastern autocrats who have been holding on to power for decades". "Instead of a Philadelphian inspired democracy, they (Arab and Muslim leaders) are looking for "Islamocracy", or Islam and democracy. "Islamic democracy" as president (Mohammad) Khatami of Iran formulated it means selection instead of election, a parliament without real attributes, a judiciary without independence, political parties without liberty, and mass communication without a voice", he pointed out. It is of common knowledge that democracy cannot be established in one day. But, one day, the process of democratisation must begin. This day has now arrived to the Middle East.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Inspiring essay from an Iranian scholar living in Copenhagen.
(Freedom, ping!)
7
posted on
03/27/2004 5:29:07 AM PST
by
Ragtime Cowgirl
("(We)..come to rout out tyranny from its nest. Confusion to the enemy." - B. Taylor, US Marine)
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
fatwa alert fot this brave man.
8
posted on
03/27/2004 6:04:53 AM PST
by
magua
To: F14 Pilot
"American plans cannot make miracles. Nevertheless, they do make a difference and they have especially changed the agenda. Already the paradigm has changed in the Middle East. For the first time in history, democracy figures on the agenda...."
Try as they may, the democrats can't take this away from President Bush. He's achieved what no other president has.....and he's not finished yet.
4 More Years !
9
posted on
03/27/2004 6:47:59 AM PST
by
nuconvert
("America will never be intimidated by thugs and assassins." ( President Bush 3-20-04))
To: F14 Pilot
Freedom ~ Now!
10
posted on
03/27/2004 6:54:02 AM PST
by
blackie
(Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Freedom ~ Bump!
We are winning ~ the bad guys are losing ~ trolls, terrorists, democrats and the mainstream media are sad ~ very sad!
~~ Bush/Cheney 2004 ~~
11
posted on
03/27/2004 7:21:11 AM PST
by
blackie
(Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
To: F14 Pilot
"It is astonishing that each time claims on freedom of speech, free elections and gender equality strongly arises, Arab and Muslim leaders immediately resort to counter attacks, considering these claims to be in contradiction with their culture and identity. What they are saying is actually that despotism and repression is more conform to Islamic and Arab values than democracy and liberty",
Well it certainly works just fine for the "leaders".
12
posted on
03/27/2004 8:03:51 AM PST
by
Valin
(Hating people is like burning down your house to kill a rat)
To: F14 Pilot
Now, when Americans are firmly demonstrating their will for democratisation of the Middle East, they are again accused being too ambitious, too naïve and hypocritical! In this respect, Professor Amitai Etzioni refers to the Bush Administrations plan as an "American Fantasy" (International Herald Tribune of 5 March 2004).
American fantasy: Instant democracy
Amitai Etzioni IHT Thursday, March 4, 2004
http://www.iht.com/articles/508762.html WASHINGTON The Bush administration plans to put before the next Group of Eight meeting an ambitious program to democratize the "greater Middle East." Yet study upon study has shown how false is the promise to democratize countries with little preparation for democracy, especially if it is done on the run. A study by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace found that of the 18 regime changes to which U.S. ground troops were committed, only five resulted in sustained democratic rule. These include Germany, Japan and Italy, in which conditions prevailed that are lacking in large parts of the world; Panama and Grenada, listed as democratized, actually have yet to earn this title.
The difficulties that the United States and its allies have in democratizing Afghanistan and Iraq are but the most recent examples in a long list of failures, which include Bosnia, Cambodia, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Kosovo, Somalia and South Vietnam.
Democracy is a delicate plant that thrives only if the soil is carefully cultivated. Even an incomplete list of what it takes to secure democracy suffices to show how hollow are promises to mass-produce it. For democracy to take root, there must be a fair level of law and order, economic development and education; a sizable middle class; respect for the rule of law; independent judges; and a rich fabric of voluntary associations.
Once these are in place, constructing the regime requires political leaders and parties able to compete freely; open and fair elections; separation of powers; a low level of corruption; protection of minority rights; and freedom of association, expression, and the press. I know this is a mouthful, but history has shown that less will not do.
When many of these factors are lacking, and when big powers are quick to declare victory and go home - especially as elections loom - they lower the definition of democracy, pinning the label on whatever they have concocted. Elections are a frequent fixture of these sleight-of-hand democratizations, disregarding the fact that elections are regularly held in places like China, Iran and Singapore. In Iraq, neither elections nor caucuses will result in anything resembling democracy.
At best, the new regime will be a very unsteady coalition. One group, the Shiites, is controlled by mullahs who already govern southern Iraq and will control whoever represents them. Another group, the Kurds, is controlled by rival tribal chieftains who govern the north. Together, they control about 80 percent of the population. If they work together, which would be no mean feat, it would be more like a coalition between the church and the mafia in old Sicily than anything resembling a democratic government.
Assuming that the country will not break up once the Americans recede, the government of Iraq is more likely to be headed by a relatively benign autocrat, à la Vladimir Putin, than by a true representative of the people, accountable to a Parliament and scrutinized by a free press and a free people. Alternatively, Iraq will follow the way Afghanistan's "democracy" is evolving - with a weak, imported leader who cannot rely on his own people and barely dares to leave the capital, and with large parts of the country controlled by warlords and ethnic tribes.
A high level of corruption must be expected, as we have already seen among members of the temporary Iraqi government. Although the new Iraqi government may not introduce a strict Muslim regime, it is likely to enforce various Islamic concepts. It is better if such governments are not labeled democratic, so that when they lose credibility democracy's name is not muddied. If we must label such regimes, "post-tyrannical" will do.
I cannot stress enough my disagreement with those who hold that Arabs are congenitally incapable of democracy. I merely follow a sociological giant, Max Weber, who showed that in some cultures economic and political development is more difficult to achieve than in others. Even in more favorable settings than the Middle East it took a long time to lay the foundation for something that resembles the real thing. After all, British and American democracy did not exactly develop overnight under the tutelage of an alienating foreign power. The occupation of Japan lasted seven years; it took 10 years before full control was turned back over to the Germans. The people of the Middle East would be best served if the United States and its allies restrained their rhetoric, promised less and delivered more. The most that can be hoped for in the near future is to keep Iraq from falling apart, avoid civil war, provide in the Sunni triangle the level of security already available elsewhere - and let the Iraqi people sort out what regime they are willing to embrace and fight for. Slowly, in time measured in decades rather than years, they may well lay the foundation for a democratic Middle East.
Amitai Etzioni teaches at George Washington University. His book "From Empire to Community: A New Approach to International Relations" will be published in May.
13
posted on
03/27/2004 8:07:23 AM PST
by
Valin
(Hating people is like burning down your house to kill a rat)
To: expat_panama
"...America is now spreading democracy, instead of just providing an example. "
Have you noticed the stories, usually buried under layers of crud, of Iraqis and Afghanis who have lived here in the US for, sometimes, decades, deciding that now is the time to go home? There was a thread about one of them here the other day, if I haven't lost track of time again.
We can do it, if we just stay the course. With a little help from our friends.
14
posted on
03/27/2004 2:42:21 PM PST
by
Old Student
(WRM, MSgt, USAF (Ret.))
To: nuconvert
From your keyboard to God's ears. It's going to take another 4 years to make sure that this is accomplished and well rooted.
15
posted on
03/27/2004 3:42:29 PM PST
by
McGavin999
(Evil thrives when good men do nothing!)
To: F14 Pilot
Professor Amitai Etzioni refers to the Bush Administrations plan as an "American Fantasy" I am acquainted with previous screeds from Georgetown University's professor Etzioni, one of which ("The Limits of Privacy") is in my library. In my personal opinion, those writings appear to come from a soul that would have found itself quite at home in Mussolini's Italy.
Based on my experience, if Etzioni refers to the Bush administration's plan as an "American Fantasy," my first reaction is to think there's something good in the plan, if only because the totalitarian Etzioni is against it. To my experience, Etzioni is no friend of freedom.
16
posted on
03/27/2004 6:15:40 PM PST
by
Eala
(Sacrificing tagline fame for... TRAD ANGLICAN RESOURCE PAGE: http://eala.freeservers.com/anglican)
To: Eala
I stand corrected on this: George Washington University -- it's been a couple years or more.
17
posted on
03/27/2004 6:19:00 PM PST
by
Eala
(Sacrificing tagline fame for... TRAD ANGLICAN RESOURCE PAGE: http://eala.freeservers.com/anglican)
To: F14 Pilot
Bump!
18
posted on
03/28/2004 12:02:02 AM PST
by
windchime
(Podesta about Bush: "He's got four years to try to undo all the stuff we've done." (TIME-1/22/01))
To: F14 Pilot
Bookmarked.
19
posted on
04/14/2004 7:54:32 AM PDT
by
happygrl
(this war is for all the marbles...)
To: happygrl
How late! lol!!!!!
20
posted on
04/14/2004 8:02:11 AM PDT
by
F14 Pilot
(John ''Fedayeen" sKerry - the Mullahs' regime candidate)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson