Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dick Clarke: Hillary's Kind of Hawk
Human Events ^ | 3/26/04 | Terence P. Jeffrey

Posted on 03/26/2004 3:19:39 PM PST by Jean S

Reading former National Security Council aide Richard Clarke's Against All Enemies--Inside America's Terror War, one half expects the omnipresent author to describe himself showing up in Philadelphia in 1776 to draft the original version of the Declaration of Independence--only to have it hopelessly rewritten by right-wing dolts like Thomas Jefferson and Ben Franklin.

By Clarke's account (see page 2 and page 6), he played a key role in many of the most significant national security crises of the last quarter-century. Things went well when his advice was heeded; disaster ensued when it was not.

The place one would not expect to find Clarke--from reading his book, anyway--is in a voting booth in 2000 pulling the lever for a Republican presidential candidate. But, testifying last week before the national commission probing the September 11 terrorist attacks, Clarke says he did just that.

"I'm not working for the Kerry campaign," Clarke protested when former Navy Secretary John Lehman suggested some might perceive Clarke as having a partisan agenda. "Last time I had to declare my party loyalty, it was to vote in the Virginia primary for President of the United States in the year 2000. And I asked for a Republican ballot."

Blaming America First

Hearing this on TV, I tried my best to suspend disbelief when I started reading Clarke's book. Perhaps it really was a serious national security study written by a hawkish Republican, who had public policy--not partisan political--differences with the Bush Administration.

Then I read Chapter 1. That's where Clarke, narrating the events of September 11, introduces Lynne Cheney, wife of Vice President Dick Cheney.

"Mrs. Cheney was more than just a family member who had to be protected," writes Clarke. "Like her husband, she was a right-wing ideologue and she was offering her advice and opinions in the bunker."

On the next page, Clarke says of the Vice President: "Below that surface of calm ran strong, almost extreme, beliefs. He had been one of the five most radical conservatives in Congress."

Make no mistake: The Cheneys are conservatives. But how likely do you think it is that an environmentalist Democratic aide in the Clinton White House would have referred to Tipper Gore as, say, an environmentalist wacko? Or noted that Al Gore had been one of the five most radical leftists in the Senate?

Answer that and you'll know how earnestly "Republican" is Richard Clarke.

In Against All Enemies, hagiographies of hallowed leftists are followed by demonizations of accursed conservatives.

If Lynn Cheney is the kind of Second Lady who would have the effrontery to offer an opinion in a bunker, what sort of First Lady was Hillary Clinton? Secretly saintly, implies Clarke.

He describes the scene at a hotel near Kennedy Airport, where President and Mrs. Clinton went to meet the families of victims of the TWA 800 disaster. "I opened the door to the next room, which had been set up as a chapel," writes Clark. "Alone in the room, on her knees, Mrs. Clinton was praying."

But when it came to piety, Hillary had nothing on Janet Reno. "She had shown incredible public courage in taking the blame for the disastrous siege of the religious cultists at Waco, Tex.," Clarke writes, referring to the incident in which Clinton's attorney general ordered the tear gas attack on the Branch Davidian compound that sparked the conflagration that resulted in the deaths of more than 70 people, including many children.

Taking credit for that showed "courage," says this "Republican." But John Ashcroft's manner of defending the Patriot Act is something else entirely. In Clarke's view, that understandably raised the specter of the Third Reich. Writes Clarke of Ashcroft: "The Attorney General, rather than bringing us together, managed to persuade much of the country that the needed reforms of the Patriot Act were actually the beginning of fascism."

Speaking of Evil Empires, Clarke even betrays ambivalence as to just how evil global Communism was.

Referring to Robert Gallucci, a member of the United Nations Special Commission on Iraq, Clarke casually states: "Gallucci and I had both been anti-Vietnam War protestors in the 1960s."

While comparing the War on Terror to the Cold War, he says: "In retrospect, some (particularly those born after 1970) believe America overreacted to the Cold War threat. At the time, however, it seemed an existential struggle, the depth of which is now difficult for many to recall or understand."

Oh, really? Who finds it difficult to understand that when a Godless empire aims thousands of nuclear warheads at your cities you are in "an existential struggle"? Only unreconstructed liberals--with whom this "Republican" Clarke obviously has deep empathy.

Partisans of Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry may ludicrously persist in portraying this man who reached the apex of his career in the Clinton White House as a Republican hawk. But, in his book, Clarke himself vividly paints his vision for a Blame-America-First Aquarian Age--that age that might have been, he suggests, if only a Clinton had ruled again.

Drawing a contrast with George W. Bush's aggressive approach to the war on terror, Clark says: "Others (Clinton, the first Bush, Carter, Ford) might have tried to understand the phenomenon of terrorism, what led 15 Saudis and four others to commit suicide to kill Americans. Others might have tried to build a world consensus to address the root causes, while using the moment to force what had been lethargic or doubting governments to arrest known terrorists and close front organizations. One can imagine Clinton trying one more time to force an Israeli-Palestinian settlement, going to Saudi Arabia and addressing the Muslim people in a moving appeal for religious tolerance . . ."

Yeah, right, Dick. Then all of us "Republicans" could have sat down with Bill, Hillary and Osama bin Laden and sung endless choruses of Give Peace a Chance.


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: richardclarke; terencepjeffrey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: P-Marlowe
He definitly thinks he knows all and is the Great Leader!
41 posted on 03/27/2004 1:31:42 AM PST by MEG33 (John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
He definitly thinks he knows all and is the Great Leader!

And for his followers, here is where it leads:


42 posted on 03/27/2004 1:35:50 AM PST by P-Marlowe (Let your light so shine before men....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: meenie
It was a public display of political insiders, de-facto government, protecting the government.
43 posted on 03/27/2004 1:54:09 AM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
"He describes the scene at a hotel near Kennedy Airport, where President and Mrs. Clinton went to meet the families of victims of the TWA 800 disaster. "I opened the door to the next room, which had been set up as a chapel," writes Clark. "Alone in the room, on her knees, Mrs. Clinton was praying."

Oh please give me a break.

"But when it came to piety, Hillary had nothing on Janet Reno. "She had shown incredible public courage in taking the blame for the disastrous siege of the religious cultists at Waco, Tex.," Clarke writes, referring to the incident in which Clinton's attorney general ordered the tear gas attack on the Branch Davidian compound that sparked the conflagration that resulted in the deaths of more than 70 people, including many children."

Oh really??? Why didn't she resign?

" Taking credit for that showed "courage," says this "Republican." But John Ashcroft's manner of defending the Patriot Act is something else entirely. In Clarke's view, that understandably raised the specter of the Third Reich. Writes Clarke of Ashcroft: "The Attorney General, rather than bringing us together, managed to persuade much of the country that the needed reforms of the Patriot Act were actually the beginning of fascism."

Hmmm what was the prior paragraph about? Oh and yes the patriot act was enacted under executive order by John Ashcroft was it? All congress did was sit on the sidelines and complain that they didn't get to vote.

"Drawing a contrast with George W. Bush's aggressive approach to the war on terror, Clark says: "Others (Clinton, the first Bush, Carter, Ford) might have tried to understand the phenomenon of terrorism, what led 15 Saudis and four others to commit suicide to kill Americans. Others might have tried to build a world consensus to address the root causes, while using the moment to force what had been lethargic or doubting governments to arrest known terrorists and close front organizations. One can imagine Clinton trying one more time to force an Israeli-Palestinian settlement, going to Saudi Arabia and addressing the Muslim people in a moving appeal for religious tolerance . . ."

TEACHER TEACHER OH OH I KNOW I KNOW Wahabies!! This shows exactly why we had sept 11 2001. The liberal mindset. And this is exactly why THEY FAILED.
44 posted on 03/27/2004 1:55:31 AM PST by Broadside Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Broadside Joe
His writing does contribute to a greater understanding of what an arrogant pompous fool he is.

I had given him at least credit on recognizing the danger of Al Queda,but he has shown himself lacking in the ability to deal with the danger.Plea for tolerance indeed.
45 posted on 03/27/2004 2:04:02 AM PST by MEG33 (John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
One could wonder about Clarke's "wartime service", college hideout perhaps. Also there other avenues of interest of a personal nature that might be indicative of his character.He has opened himself up for such interest.
46 posted on 03/27/2004 2:07:36 AM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
If you haven't seen this yet check it out.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1105829/posts
Preparing for The Next Pearl Harbor Attack (JUNE 2001, Bush team addressing terrorism threat)
47 posted on 03/27/2004 2:16:50 AM PST by Broadside Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Broadside Joe
I don't link but I googled and found, under Richard Clarke, a 2003 article on the "security focus" site ridiculing Clarke on his "accomplishments".

I saw the cyncooper find.I pinged a lot of people to it and hope it is widely emailed!
48 posted on 03/27/2004 2:27:20 AM PST by MEG33 (John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Dundee; cynicom
You must see this and the link at #47.There is a referral to his anti war protesting days,cynicom.
49 posted on 03/27/2004 2:41:22 AM PST by MEG33 (John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
What amazes me is the democrats actually believe this tripe and are salivating. Their problem is they underestimate the intelligence of, Thank God, most of the electorate. This guy's writing looks like something written by a ten year old. And if this is all they got, the democrats must be very worried.

I really do think this guy's writing is comical.
50 posted on 03/27/2004 2:48:18 AM PST by Terry Mross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus
That's PERFECT! I do SO wish I'd hear that statement at the end of one of the debates this fall.
51 posted on 03/27/2004 2:49:02 AM PST by IrishRainy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: eggman
So I heard little Dicky is a "life-long bachelor." What's the scoop on his "best friend" Rand Beers? Married, single, uh...otherwise taken? Curious minds want to know!
52 posted on 03/27/2004 2:51:00 AM PST by IrishRainy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross
I thought he was at least better than this...astonishing!
53 posted on 03/27/2004 2:56:13 AM PST by MEG33 (John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Peach; leadpenny; RobFromGa
This just amazed me.
54 posted on 03/27/2004 6:36:04 AM PST by MEG33 (John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
Oh, brother. No, he's not partisan. He's just never given $$ to a Republican candidate preferring instead to give to Democrats.
55 posted on 03/27/2004 6:37:43 AM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: IrishRainy
So I heard little Dicky is a "life-long bachelor." What's the scoop on his "best friend" Rand Beers? Married, single, uh...otherwise taken? Curious minds want to know!

My thoughts too!

56 posted on 03/27/2004 9:11:43 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson