To: TomGuy
Clarke's 'impression of Condi' not knowing about al-Qaeda was "erroneous." [Yeh, it was an out and out lie.]Unfortunately, that is not what Berger said.
However, the facts seem clear and perhaps it's fortunate that Berger has exposed himself as an extreme partisan (something we freepers have known for years, of course).
Fox has that ass Bob Graham on saying Rice should appear before the committee IN RESPONSE to being asked about Fox pointing out the Clarke discrepancies between book and the newly discovered taped interview.
813 posted on
03/24/2004 9:23:24 AM PST by
cyncooper
("The 'War on Terror ' is not a figure of speech")
To: cyncooper
Clarke's 'impression of Condi' not knowing about al-Qaeda was "erroneous." [Yeh, it was an out and out lie.]
Sorry for the misunderstanding. I was not quoting Berger. The questioner said 'erroneous' and Berger sidestepped a response. (I should have drawn a line between that statement and the previous about Berger talking to Condi.)
908 posted on
03/24/2004 9:38:14 AM PST by
TomGuy
(Clintonites have such good hind-sight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
To: cyncooper
I told that stupid aide of Graham's yesterday to keep microphones away from that senile old geezer. I especially pointed out his refusal to admit that condi rice is not just an expert on the soviet union and russia,but a multitude of Countries. For God's sake she tutored W on all that for months prior to his becoming president,and even after.
1,319 posted on
03/24/2004 11:00:34 AM PST by
samantha
(Don't panic, the adults are in charge)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson