Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin
Mansoor Iljaz is right. Richard Clarke failed to carry out a fraction of the steps he charges President Bush with not taking. His new book should be considered a feeble attempt to refurbish the Clinton Administration's failure to address the most dangerous threat confronting the United States during its eight years in power.
14 posted on 03/23/2004 12:29:07 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: goldstategop
Something fishy about this Clarke. I wonder if he isn't an agent of another country beyond being a partisan democrat. You look at his statements over the years and the stances he takes are inconsitant. Some of his schemes are down right ridiculous. Thankfully this Bush administration had removed him from where he can do more damage. First he says in 92 that Bush senior wasn't tough enough on Iraq, wasn't paying attention, then he does everything he can to prevent Bin Laden from being apprehended during Clinton's years, now he says Bush wasn't looking at the danger of bin laden but focusing on Iraq, which contradicts obvious facts, such as the timing of events. This guy is beyond incompetent, he is a dangerous man. I hope somebody is investigating him.
15 posted on 03/23/2004 3:03:36 AM PST by TimPatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson