NY Sun Reporter Tom Lipscomb-Redacted FBI Documents Show Kerry at 'Assassination Meeting'

Laura Ingraham Show/ 870 KRLA AM Radio ^ | mARCH 18, 2004 | Tom Lipscomb

[threat matrix]

Mr. Lipscomb was just on the Laura Ingraham show and said he now has 7 seperate witnesses, a left wing historian and redacted FBI documents that show John Kerry was at the Kansas City 'Vietnam Veterans Against the War' meeting in 1971 where the assassination of seven United States Senators was discussed.

Kerry had previously said he was not at the meeting.

[doug from upland]

No memo was leaked. This info has been out there but it took research to find it and expose it. Until he was set to become the candidate, it just sat there without too much notice.

[Shermy]

Thanks.

[backhoe]

Cross-link:

-John Kerry- some selected, informative links...--

[Saundra Duffy]

Well then he's toast . . . or sure should be.

[Fiddlstix]

BTTT

[Dead Dog]

He wasn't there before he was.
I wonder if he voted yes before he voted no.

[Saundra Duffy]

Excuse me but people do care if Kerry was part of a group that actually talked about assassinating people! Give me a break!!

[Hon]

"Im almost positive this is the handiwork of the Hillary/DNC/MoveOn.org crowd"

You're wrong.

[cyncooper]

Kerry had previously said he was not at the meeting.

More than just "previously said", he's repeatedly and emphatically said he was not there and has had his campaign repeat the assertion over and over.

I've been following this story with great interest. Thank you for posting the latest. Up to 7 witnesses, plus an historian and FBI docs, hm?

Whoops!

[BlessedByLiberty]

Hillary has always been the stealth candidate. However, the UN scandal may put a damper on her future ambitions - Annan and Clinton are too tight for the Clintons not to have known what was going on with the Food for Oily Politicians program.

Hellary has been raising all that money for Kerry, it ends up in DNC coffers under Clinton/McAwful control.

As usual the Clintons walk away with the spoils. Whether their avaricious ambitions continue in the political arena or not depends on the polls.

[vbmoneyspender]

I wonder if he voted yes before he voted no.

I think he's already answered that question. ;-)

[GraniteStateConservative]

I just don't think they do. There's no evidence that Kerry advocated this policy. He didn't try to assassinate a senator. The sheeple don't care.

[Judith Anne]

THIS DESERVES A THREAD OF ITS OWN:

C-span will be showing the DICK CAVETT show from 1971 next sun.(3-28) @ 6:30pm est.

Now I know why Kerry is "taking some time off."

I'm positive this is coming out, sooner rather than later.

[cyncooper]

Cant we just 'move on!' (they were only discussing/voting on the murder of seven US Senators..)

Kerry can point out that he eventually joined the U.S. Senate himself (as we all know) and didn't try to shoot any of these guys--not even once.

[cyncooper]

I wish that we could keep Kerry afloat longer, until after the convention, then watch him sink when it is too late for Clinton to step in . We had better be prepared to stop her.

I discard the idea of playing games with this kind of thing. The information is coming out, you deal with it head on. If it's the end of John Kerry (in a sane world it would be), so be it and hallelujiah.

If freepers have anticipated Hillary entering the race, then the Bush people have and they'll deal with her. It isn't like she has a pristine history. Quite the opposite. And this time, instead of dealing with a First Lady who the media protested out not be ganged up on, our team will most definitely lay out once again what there is to know about her. And I'm sure there are plenty of things we never dreamed of that will also come out.

Dick Cheney yesterday demonstrated he can ably go for the jugular and not muss his hair.

Deal with this head on and not pussy foot around playing calendar games.

[ntnychik]

If this is true, then Kerry lied in his interviews with the author of Home to War. More tonight.

[cyncooper]

Or Edwards. He scares me almost more than she does.

Worry not. Edwards is an extreme lightweight and would scare most Americans---in his lack of knowledge about how to deal with world affairs.

He isn't worth the effort of worrying about and should he emerge if Kerry is destroyed (fingers crossed) it would be a piece of cake to beat him. Really, it would.

[Ciexyz]

Maybe his body was there but his mind was far, far away?

[leprechaun9]

This is the reason that the President should NOT respond to John Freakin' Kerry. He should focus his reelection efforts on his vision for the future and identify the areas where we needs support from the people to overcome the expected obstacles (Democraps and RINOs).

In NJ, we saw this happen when shortly before the election for Governor, Torricelli's ratings were in avalanche mode and although it was past the deadline to switch candidates, Frank Lousenberg was resusitated and placed on the ballot with the support of the NJ Supreme Court (including Whitless liberal appointees).

The Republican candidate had focused his campaign efforts at the sleazy record of Toricelli, but he did not emphasize his vision for the state and how he would accomplish it. When the Democrap candidate switched, the Republican campaign was shot and he had to start all over with only a short time and facing the well known Lousenberg!

I hope the Bush/Cheney team learned from that fraud!

[cyncooper]

I'm still reading replies, so if nobody has pointed it out yet, I must after seeing comment after comment about the FBI files.

The Kerry supporting author of that book about Kerry is the one who had the redacted files. I'm sure from a freedom of information act request when he wrote his book years ago.

That's it, nothing from the VRWC or RAM.