Replies

Well, Sen. Arlene Spectre delved into Scottish law during the Klintoon impeachment proceedings, so why not the Supremes?

After all, multi-culturalism and globalism is where it's at today, and the justices want to be seen as cool dudes and dudettes.....even though most of them are a banana-peel away from slipping off this mortal coil.

Leni

12 posted on 03/13/2004 6:29:58 PM PST by MinuteGal (Register now for "FReeps Ahoy 3" . A week of fun, food, freeperistics, starting in the low $700's!)

I agree, Arlene Spectre is a dope and a major RINO to boot. And do you remember when Chucky Schumer (Marxist-Hades) and fat Teddy (D-Cutty Sark) suggested to Bush that HE be nominated to fill the next SCOTUS vacancy and that he'd be approved without a problem! That alone says that ole Arlene is unfit to serve ANYWHERE. It's amazing that he keeps getting re-elected.

That being said, let's not be so harsh on the senate republicans for caving on the impeachment trial. If Willard would have been found guilty, we would have had a President Gore! He would have been the incumbent in 2000 and I doubt Dubya could have beat him then.

30 posted on 03/14/2004 6:25:38 AM PST by Condor51 ("Diplomacy without arms is like music without instruments." -- Frederick the Great)