1 posted on
03/13/2004 6:15:20 PM PST by
steplock
To: steplock
"Throw the bums out" bump!
To: steplock
Well, now... someone starting to figure it out?
3 posted on
03/13/2004 6:18:44 PM PST by
thoughtomator
(All I ever wanted to know about Islam I learned on 9/11)
To: steplock
I hope they pass this resolution.
To: steplock
I think this trend -- using "international" precedent in formulating Supreme Court opinion -- is as vile, disgusting, and dangerous as anything in American history.
Unfortunately, the public is largely unaware of it and its lethality.
To: steplock
This is what I call "thinking outside the box."
10 posted on
03/13/2004 6:28:32 PM PST by
syriacus
(1/16/04 Kerry smeared Pickering by calling him a tireless advocate for a cross burner)
To: steplock; All
Never happen. And y'all know it. SCOTUS is there for life.
Move along, citizens, there's nothing to see here, go back to your lives, "Friends" is on in ten minutes, anyway...
To: steplock
Well, Sen. Arlene Spectre delved into Scottish law during the Klintoon impeachment proceedings, so why not the Supremes?
After all, multi-culturalism and globalism is where it's at today, and the justices want to be seen as cool dudes and dudettes.....even though most of them are a banana-peel away from slipping off this mortal coil.
Leni
12 posted on
03/13/2004 6:29:58 PM PST by
MinuteGal
(Register now for "FReeps Ahoy 3" . A week of fun, food, freeperistics, starting in the low $700's!)
To: steplock
I remember this came up last summer or fall. Democrats did the usual thing and justified it with idiotic comparisons or calling European laws superior.
Personally i want to staple a copy of the constitution to the forehead of the judges, when I'm done i want to staple a copy of the declaration of Independence to the foreheads of liberals.
13 posted on
03/13/2004 6:31:08 PM PST by
cripplecreek
(you tell em i'm commin.... and hells commin with me.)
To: steplock
"The impressions we create in this world are important and they can leave their mark," O'Connor said in remarks quoted in the Atlanta Constitution. Looking to foreign precedents "may not only enrich our own country's decisions, I think it may create that all-important good impression.""
The loons have lost it. MARK this woman she is a fruit.
To: steplock
The next step in denying God's sovereignty over the United States will go to these nine people . .
"The question is or at least ought to be, how can such a small, godless, minority have such influence over our courts and legislative processes?"
Answer:
U.S. Supreme Court, 2004 - The Oligarchy*
(All Your Sovereignty Are Belong To Us!)
Back Row (left to right): Ginsburg, Souter, Thomas, Breyer
Front Row (left to right): Scalia, Stevens, Rehnquist, O'Connor, Kennedy
oligarchy Pronunciation:
'ä-l&-"gär-kE, 'O-Function:
nounInflected Form(s):
plural -chiesDate: 1542
1 : government by the few
2 : a government in which a small group exercises control especially for corrupt and selfish purposes;
also : a group exercising such control
3 : an organization under
oligarchic control
sovereignty
Variant(s): also sovranty /-tE/
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -ties
Etymology: Middle English soverainte, from Middle French soveraineté, from Old French, from soverain
Date: 14th century
1 obsolete : supreme excellence or an example of it
2 a : supreme power especially over a body politic b : freedom from external control : AUTONOMY c : controlling influence
3 : one that is SOVEREIGN; especially : an autonomous state
18 posted on
03/13/2004 6:52:15 PM PST by
Happy2BMe
(U.S.A. - - United We Stand - - Divided We Fall - - Support Our Troops - - Vote BUSH)
To: steplock
Impeachment is one way to approach TREASON.
20 posted on
03/13/2004 6:53:57 PM PST by
Siobhan
(+Pray the Divine Mercy Chaplet+)
To: Askel5; Sabretooth
SCOTUS flag....
21 posted on
03/13/2004 6:55:06 PM PST by
Siobhan
(+Pray the Divine Mercy Chaplet+)
To: steplock
BTTT
23 posted on
03/13/2004 7:10:50 PM PST by
Unicorn
To: steplock
INTREP - JUDICIAL TYRANNY ALERT - and a call for the impeachment of those who institute an oligarchy in Supreme Court
To: Mrs Zip; BOBWADE
ping
26 posted on
03/13/2004 7:30:22 PM PST by
zip
To: steplock
A Congressional resolution trying to control the decision-making methodology of the Supreme Court would be a snub to the separation of powers ... and without any effect.
In the first few decades of its work, the Supreme Court made extensive use of British court precedents.
The recent Supreme Court decisions hardly ever mention foreign decisions - and then almost invariably with regard to how treaties to which the US is a party are interpreted by other parties. Even then, the court is not "following" these foreign decisions, but merely using them as examples of legal analysis and interpretation of provisions that are the same in both countries.
28 posted on
03/14/2004 4:59:13 AM PST by
DonQ
To: steplock
Pest-control bump
31 posted on
03/14/2004 9:51:58 AM PST by
inquest
(The only problem with partisanship is that it leads to bipartisanship)
To: steplock
Impeach O'Connor, Kennedy and Buzzi Ginsburg.
To: steplock
This bill, or something like it, is sorely needed. There is ONE supreme law of this land, and that is the Constitution of the United States of America. Not the Bible, not the Quran, not resolutions from the Dictators' Club United Nations...
35 posted on
03/14/2004 7:54:02 PM PST by
xm177e2
(Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
To: steplock
In fact 12 federal judges have been impeached:
Impeachments of Federal OfficialsSeven were convicted and removed from office; one resigned; and three were acquitted.
37 posted on
03/14/2004 9:18:58 PM PST by
Celtman
(It's never right to do wrong to do right.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson