Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/13/2004 6:15:20 PM PST by steplock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: steplock
"Throw the bums out" bump!
2 posted on 03/13/2004 6:17:00 PM PST by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: steplock
Well, now... someone starting to figure it out?
3 posted on 03/13/2004 6:18:44 PM PST by thoughtomator (All I ever wanted to know about Islam I learned on 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: steplock
I hope they pass this resolution.
6 posted on 03/13/2004 6:21:59 PM PST by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: steplock
I think this trend -- using "international" precedent in formulating Supreme Court opinion -- is as vile, disgusting, and dangerous as anything in American history.

Unfortunately, the public is largely unaware of it and its lethality.

9 posted on 03/13/2004 6:26:16 PM PST by M. Thatcher (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: steplock
This is what I call "thinking outside the box."
10 posted on 03/13/2004 6:28:32 PM PST by syriacus (1/16/04 Kerry smeared Pickering by calling him a tireless advocate for a cross burner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: steplock; All
Never happen. And y'all know it. SCOTUS is there for life.

Move along, citizens, there's nothing to see here, go back to your lives, "Friends" is on in ten minutes, anyway...

11 posted on 03/13/2004 6:28:51 PM PST by Old Sarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: steplock
Well, Sen. Arlene Spectre delved into Scottish law during the Klintoon impeachment proceedings, so why not the Supremes?

After all, multi-culturalism and globalism is where it's at today, and the justices want to be seen as cool dudes and dudettes.....even though most of them are a banana-peel away from slipping off this mortal coil.

Leni

12 posted on 03/13/2004 6:29:58 PM PST by MinuteGal (Register now for "FReeps Ahoy 3" . A week of fun, food, freeperistics, starting in the low $700's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: steplock
I remember this came up last summer or fall. Democrats did the usual thing and justified it with idiotic comparisons or calling European laws superior.

Personally i want to staple a copy of the constitution to the forehead of the judges, when I'm done i want to staple a copy of the declaration of Independence to the foreheads of liberals.
13 posted on 03/13/2004 6:31:08 PM PST by cripplecreek (you tell em i'm commin.... and hells commin with me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: steplock
"The impressions we create in this world are important and they can leave their mark," O'Connor said in remarks quoted in the Atlanta Constitution. Looking to foreign precedents "may not only enrich our own country's decisions, I think it may create that all-important good impression.""


The loons have lost it. MARK this woman she is a fruit.
14 posted on 03/13/2004 6:35:43 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: steplock
The next step in denying God's sovereignty over the United States will go to these nine people . .

"The question is or at least ought to be, how can such a small, godless, minority have such influence over our courts and legislative processes?"

Answer:

U.S. Supreme Court, 2004 - The Oligarchy*

(All Your Sovereignty Are Belong To Us!)

Justices of the Supreme Court

Back Row (left to right): Ginsburg, Souter, Thomas, Breyer
Front Row (left to right): Scalia, Stevens, Rehnquist, O'Connor, Kennedy

ol•i•gar•chy
Pronunciation: 'ä-l&-"gär-kE, 'O-
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -chies
Date: 1542
1 : government by the few
2 : a government in which a small group exercises control especially for corrupt and selfish purposes; also : a group exercising such control
3 : an organization under oligarchic control

sov•er•eign•ty
Variant(s): also sov•ran•ty /-tE/
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -ties
Etymology: Middle English soverainte, from Middle French soveraineté, from Old French, from soverain
Date: 14th century
1 obsolete : supreme excellence or an example of it
2 a : supreme power especially over a body politic b : freedom from external control : AUTONOMY c : controlling influence
3 : one that is SOVEREIGN; especially : an autonomous state


18 posted on 03/13/2004 6:52:15 PM PST by Happy2BMe (U.S.A. - - United We Stand - - Divided We Fall - - Support Our Troops - - Vote BUSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: steplock
Impeachment is one way to approach TREASON.
20 posted on 03/13/2004 6:53:57 PM PST by Siobhan (+Pray the Divine Mercy Chaplet+)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Askel5; Sabretooth
SCOTUS flag....
21 posted on 03/13/2004 6:55:06 PM PST by Siobhan (+Pray the Divine Mercy Chaplet+)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: steplock
BTTT
23 posted on 03/13/2004 7:10:50 PM PST by Unicorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: steplock
INTREP - JUDICIAL TYRANNY ALERT - and a call for the impeachment of those who institute an oligarchy in Supreme Court
25 posted on 03/13/2004 7:28:37 PM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mrs Zip; BOBWADE
ping
26 posted on 03/13/2004 7:30:22 PM PST by zip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: steplock
A Congressional resolution trying to control the decision-making methodology of the Supreme Court would be a snub to the separation of powers ... and without any effect.

In the first few decades of its work, the Supreme Court made extensive use of British court precedents.

The recent Supreme Court decisions hardly ever mention foreign decisions - and then almost invariably with regard to how treaties to which the US is a party are interpreted by other parties. Even then, the court is not "following" these foreign decisions, but merely using them as examples of legal analysis and interpretation of provisions that are the same in both countries.

28 posted on 03/14/2004 4:59:13 AM PST by DonQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: steplock
Pest-control bump
31 posted on 03/14/2004 9:51:58 AM PST by inquest (The only problem with partisanship is that it leads to bipartisanship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: steplock
Impeach O'Connor, Kennedy and Buzzi Ginsburg.
34 posted on 03/14/2004 7:50:00 PM PST by DLfromthedesert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: steplock
This bill, or something like it, is sorely needed. There is ONE supreme law of this land, and that is the Constitution of the United States of America. Not the Bible, not the Quran, not resolutions from the Dictators' Club United Nations...
35 posted on 03/14/2004 7:54:02 PM PST by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: steplock
In fact 12 federal judges have been impeached: Impeachments of Federal Officials
Seven were convicted and removed from office; one resigned; and three were acquitted.
37 posted on 03/14/2004 9:18:58 PM PST by Celtman (It's never right to do wrong to do right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson