Rise of the Milblogs: Hugh Hewitt on the best sources of information on the war, and their blogs.

www.weeklystandard.com ^ | March 12, 2004 | Hugh Hewitt

[RonDog]

.

Rise of the Milblogs
Some of the best sources of information on the war are from the people actually fighting it--and their blogs.
by Hugh Hewitt
03/12/2004 12:00:00 AM

AS THE WAR enters a phase where most of the fighting is far removed from the networks' cameras, it gets harder and harder to find reliable news on the conflict's many fronts.

Unless you read the milblogs, that is. "Milblogs" is short for "military blogs"--online journals run by active duty military or reservists who have returned to civilian life for the time being. These first person accounts of the world and the nation through the eyes of front-line troops are changing the nature not just of the blogosphere but of American reporting.

Take the recent postings of Sgt. Hook as one example of journalism at its finest. Hook is the First Sergeant of a 130 soldier heavy lift helicopter company that is deploying to Afghanistan. He'll be offline for a while, but when he signs back on, I'll take his word for conditions on the ground in the battle against al Qaeda in central Asia.

There are a number of great milblogs, though the ones I try to read daily are Smash, who has fought in the war and is now returned to civilian life; MudvilleGazette, currently stationed in Europe (and who has the best list of milblogs I can find); Blackfive, a paratrooper with great writing skills; and Chief Wiggles, whose toy drive for the children of Iraq got some much deserved attention last year and who is now heading back to Iraq for some additional duty. There are many, many more, including folks like Joe Carter at EvangelicalOutpost, whose blog tends more towards the cultural, religious, and political than the military but who is still very much a Marine.

Some of the milblogs that generate traffic are run by very anonymous writers about whom some degree of skepticism should attach. Of the six I cite in this piece, five are quite certainly real people with the military backgrounds they detail and make little effort to hide their identities. Hook is the blog for which I have no confirmation of authenticity, and the "April 1, 2004" date on his last posting generated some unease among Hook readers, though it appears as though that's just the date on which he hopes to be operational again. Still, readers will have to use some care in sorting though the milblogs to make sure they aren't absorbing some fantasy of an armchair general.

The ability of the civilian world to access the news and views of the military directly is a sea-change in media. At the conclusion of his wonderful 1998 book, Making the Corps, Washington Post writer Thomas Ricks worried aloud about the increasing distance between the civilian and military worlds, and the divergence in the values of both. Part of that problem was that the world of the warrior was increasingly remote from ordinary Americans who don't have much contact with the military.

MILBLOGS ARE CHANGING THAT CONDITION, and having other far-reaching effects as well. An obvious one: Whose thoughts on the conditions in Baghdad would you trust more: Wiggles or lefty pest Atrios? Or on the momentum of the fight in Afghanistan: the future dispatches of Hook or the ruminations of Joshua Micah Marshall? More broadly, these milblogs comment on all subjects of interest in American culture. You'll reject a lot of what they have to say, but slowly. Because unlike civilian bloggers (including yours truly) the men and women who have been fighting the war deserve a hearing from the fair-minded.

THE SKYROCKETING POPULARITY of the milblogs guarantees that it won't be long before two things happen.

First, major media will figure out that they want to link to one or more of these folks as a way of adding authenticity to their sites. I hope Pentagon regulations allow these folks to get paid when the professional link people arrive. After all, any site that wants traffic must know that these sites are climbing quickly up the daily traffic rankings.

Second, some mid-level Pentagon type will decide that troops and officers speaking their mind is a threat to the tradition of a military detached from politics. Here's hoping Secretary Rumsfeld squashes that with a pre-emptive snow-flake that notes this develop is critical to the public's understanding of the sacrifices and contribution of America's military.

Case in point: Hook's penultimate post: It concerns his 9-year-old son who won't be seeing his dad for a few months while dad is off taking the fight to the terrorists. That post alone does more to convey the crucial message to the civilian world eager to debate the level of prescription drug benefits.

Bookmark a few of the milblogs as a guarantee against complacency. And as an assurance of great commentary and good humor as well.

Hugh Hewitt is the host of The Hugh Hewitt Show, a nationally syndicated radio talkshow, and a contributing writer to The Daily Standard. His new book, In, But Not Of, has just been published by Thomas Nelson.

[lainde]

bump for reference!

[RonDog]

"Milblogs" is short for "military blogs"--online journals run by active duty military or reservists who have returned to civilian life for the time being.

These first person accounts of the world and the nation through the eyes of front-line troops are changing the nature not just of the blogosphere but of American reporting. - Hugh Hewitt

.

www.HughHewitt.com
PING!

If you listen to Hugh Hewitt,
or read his WorldNetDaily articles,
or his commentary at the Weekly Standard,
then this PING list is for YOU!
Please post your comments, and BUMP!

(If you want OFF - or ON - my "Hugh Hewitt PING list" - please let me know)

[RonDog]

ping

[onyx]

Big PINGS needed here

[annyokie]

Thanks for the ping! I'll pass it on to all!

[Political Junkie Too]

In the category of "A Picture Is Worth a Thousand Words," one would also have to add the "Gotta See This" threads by Diogenesis to supplement the military blogs.

-PJ

[ALOHA RONNIE]

.


Mudville Gazette lovingly remembers...



'911 Remembered: RICK RESCORLA was a Soldier'

http://www.Freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/978534/posts


.

[RonDog]

In the category of "A Picture Is Worth a Thousand Words," one would also have to add the "Gotta See This" threads by Diogenesis to supplement the military blogs.

-PJ

That would be THESE threads:

GOTTA SEE THIS! A Compiled Look at the War on Terrorism threads posted by Diogenesis. (Updated)
			Posted by ThomasMore On News/Activism 03/09/2004 7:47:37 AM PST with 34 comments FreeRepublic | 03-09-2004 | Diogenesis, ThomasMore

[onyx]

Need military ping please Bri.

[68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub]

"Need military ping please"

PING!

onyx : Thanks

[Soaring Feather]

((((ping)))))

[Soaring Feather]

bump

[SAMWolf]

Thanks Feather.

[Nix 2]

Stamp designed by Jon Wallenius, veteran of LZ Albany and LZ X-Ray from a photo of Rick Rescorla. Rick survived Ia Drang but died saving lives September 11, 2001.

[jokar]

bump for reference!

[Nitro]

Disturbing Beer News
Yesterday, University scientists released the results of a recent analysis that revealed the presence of female hormones in beer. Men should take a concerned look at their beer consumption. The theory is that beer contains female hormones (hops contain phytoestrogens) and that by drinking enough beer, men turn into women.

To test the theory, 100 men were fed 8 pints of beer each within a 1 hour period. It was then observed that 100% of the test subjects:

1) Gained weight.
2) Talked excessively without making sense.
3) Became overly emotional.
4) Couldn't drive.
5) Failed to think rationally.
6) Argued over nothing.
7) Had to sit down while urinating.
8) Refused to apologize when obviously wrong.

No further testing was considered necessary

[metesky]

Bump it up.

[gunnyg]

Don't think the following came from a Milblog--appears to be just an e-mail going around lately--anybody seen this and/or have any further scoop on this?
Thanx!

"> Subject: FW: United States Flag
>
> I would just like to pass on to all concerned. Today, here at KIRKUK AB, Iraq, we were told that we were no longer allowed to fly the United States flag. The reason we were given is so we would not offend the Iraqi people. We were told that we are not occupying this country! And apparently we are not in charge. Well, my question is this. If we are not in charge, then who is? Obviously, the Iraqi people are not. The Iraqi people do not run any of these bases over here yet, and may not for quite some time. We at KIRKUK AB, Fire Dept have up to today, both Post and Retire the colors every day. Today in a show of respect and honor especially for those who have fallen, we disobeyed the order and raised our flag, but less than an hour later we were Ordered to take our flag down. The moral here is low, but our mission remains in focus. It is a slap in the face of those families back home who have lost a loved ones. It is also a slap in the face for those who still remain here, not only protecting our people back home, but trying to make a difference here in the pursuit of freedom for the Iraqi people. I would appreciate the widest dissemination of this message. If we are to fly the Iraqi flag with our flag then so be it. But don't tell us that cant show the respect for our flag, when so many have died in the name of Freedom. The only people I think who would be offended, are the people who kill innocent women and children in the name of religion. Thank you for your support and prayers.
>
>
> Samuel D. Arbuckle, TSgt, USAFR
> 506 ECES/CEF
> FREEDOM AB
> KIRKUK, IRAQ
> DSN(318)460-0030
> From: Talley Chuck CMSgt 506 AEG/CCC
> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 5:11 PM
> To: Roznovsky Franklin SMSgt 355 AMXS
> Cc: 506 AEG FSGT's; 506 AEG CHIEFS
> Subject: RE: Flying of US Flag
> All outside US flags need to come down per CENTAF guidance. Col Gibson is taking this back to CENTAF. Inside flags are good, Chief T
> We are allowed to put the flag up for special days or events, but we can't have it up all the time implying that we are occupying Iraq. Chief T
>
> Sir, When we carry the bodies of our fallen men and women to the aircraft for their final flight home, can we still drape the coffins with our flag, or will that still offend the people that we are dying for so they can be liberated.
> MSgt, W. Dalton
>
> CHIEF
> Harold S. Bromell, CMSgt, USAF
> 1 OG/CEM
> Langley AFB, VA 23665-2789
> (DSN 574-1927/2912
> (Comm (757) 764-1927/2912
> FAX 574-7459
> +harold.bromell@langley.af.mil
>
> Have A Nice Day


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~"

[PGalt]

Great post. Thanks.