Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Double drink prices, urges doctors -
The Telegraph - UK ^ | March 5, 2004 | Celia Hall

Posted on 03/05/2004 12:00:54 PM PST by UnklGene

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-131 next last
To: realpatriot71
Government supportive nanny staters have no right to call themselves a "realpatriot". Please change your monikor to more accurately reflect your views.
41 posted on 03/05/2004 12:37:27 PM PST by CSM (Looking for a stay at home mom for my future offspring!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: UnklGene
Let's see! In 1970 to my recollection a bottle of beer here in Ohio cast about$.50 and a mixed drink maybe $1.00. They cost more today, but our consumption has gone up! So raise the price further and our consumtion will go --- up?
42 posted on 03/05/2004 12:39:05 PM PST by NavyCaptain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CSM
Government supportive nanny staters have no right to call themselves a "realpatriot". Please change your monikor to more accurately reflect your views.

You don't have a right to cheap booze. If you don't want to pay their tax, make your own.

BTW - kiss my ass

43 posted on 03/05/2004 12:39:39 PM PST by realpatriot71 ("But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise . . ." (I Cor. 1:27))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
I love the comparison to 1970 prices!

In 1970 in almost any neighborhood bar in Brockton, you could get a 16 oz. Narragansit (Nasty Narrie) and a shot of bar whiskey for $.60!

Workingman's luncheon special.

44 posted on 03/05/2004 12:42:13 PM PST by metesky ("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: freeeee
indeed.
45 posted on 03/05/2004 12:42:13 PM PST by kallisti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: UnklGene
Yes, we need more control!

People don't go to the doctor enough, and I have the perfect solution; cut all doctor's salaries in half!

46 posted on 03/05/2004 12:42:22 PM PST by Cobra Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: realpatriot71

"If you don't want to pay the tax, make your own tea."

47 posted on 03/05/2004 12:42:53 PM PST by freeeee ("Owning" property in the US just means you have one less landlord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: realpatriot71
make your own.

Don't we have laws prohibiting that?

48 posted on 03/05/2004 12:43:35 PM PST by Bella_Bru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: UnklGene
We have a big problem in their reasoning.

However, the academy argues that drinking levels should return to those of the early 1970s when the population drank on average seven litres of alcohol per head a year. This compares with the 11.1 litres now consumed.

The doctors said that drinking at levels of one or two drinks a day provided proven health benefits but that higher amounts began to do harm.

Taking the latter point, the official recommendation is 3 drinks per day (for a man). If one assumes that these are standard glasses of wine, each being 125 m.l., that makes 375 m.l./day of wine. That makes 136.875 litres of wine per annum. Taking 12.5% a.b.v. gives 13.86875 litres of pure alcohol; i.e., this excessive drinking (11 litres) is below the government suggestion (14 litres).
49 posted on 03/05/2004 12:44:45 PM PST by tjwmason (A voice from Merry England.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: realpatriot71
A real patriot like the great brewer Samual Adams would be ashamed to be seen in your company.
50 posted on 03/05/2004 12:45:52 PM PST by metesky ("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: metesky
Not to mention what Thomas Paine might have written about today's America.
51 posted on 03/05/2004 12:47:23 PM PST by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: tjwmason
Good catch, tj.
;O)
52 posted on 03/05/2004 12:47:26 PM PST by metesky ("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: realpatriot71
"You don't have a right to cheap booze."

I thought that personal liberty and freedom meant that I do have the right to cheap booze. I am also under the impression that government should be limited in its power and that the evergrowing theft of cash out of our pockets was evil.

I see that I am mistaken and that real patriots should be supportive of the government's right to take as many dollars of mine in taxes as they desire.
53 posted on 03/05/2004 12:48:01 PM PST by CSM (Looking for a stay at home mom for my future offspring!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: tjwmason
NO, no, those numbers are calculated using the effects of SHS on a human body with the same amount of alcohol.

Massages aren't just for backs. They work even better on stats.
54 posted on 03/05/2004 12:48:46 PM PST by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: UnklGene
The hard core consumers will pay the price while their dependents will have to do with less. Some doctors think they are so smart.
55 posted on 03/05/2004 12:51:34 PM PST by oyez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: UnklGene
Would this affect Ted Kennedy???
56 posted on 03/05/2004 12:53:08 PM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metesky
Aaaah,Brockton---the old nemesis of Newton North.
57 posted on 03/05/2004 12:53:10 PM PST by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: realpatriot71
I don't have to buy, and I don't pay the tax. It's a choice.

I agree it is a choice. My disagreement comes with your apparent willingness to ok a tax on what you would call a "vice". Taxes such as that, always well intentioned (like the road to hell), are in my experience, miserable failures. In the end, small businesses such as bars and restaurants will get crushed, black or gray margets will emerge, and the "health benefits" that everyone should enjoy due to higher taxation turn out to be a myth. It's my hope that most voters, and their representatives, are reluctant to promote more taxation for something as ridiculous as limiting someone's personal legal freedoms.

58 posted on 03/05/2004 12:56:04 PM PST by Shryke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Shryke
>>>It's my hope that most voters, and their representatives, are reluctant to promote more taxation for something as ridiculous as limiting someone's personal legal freedoms.

FAT CHANCE. Mention health or kids, and people will turn in their mother.

59 posted on 03/05/2004 12:58:49 PM PST by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Mears
I knew it was time to leave Cape Cod when Barnstable High beat Brockton for the Div. I football title.

When we moved to the Cape it was a nice place; low population, three month summer party, return to normalcy.

Now you might as well live in Brockton or Malden or Meffa.

60 posted on 03/05/2004 12:59:34 PM PST by metesky ("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-131 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson