Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wysiwyg
Yes. Other than the spelling, there is no difference.
9 posted on 03/03/2004 8:56:06 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen
Other than the spelling, there is no difference.

Granted. Another excerpt from his book, p. 133:

Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying we don't need government. I'm no anarchist. The worst places in the world are the places that have no security, almost no rules. We need rule of law. but do we need so much?

The founders' vision of limited government is one of the greatest philosophical achievements of humanity because it protects people while leaving them free to pursue their own interests. That freedom is what makes so many other good and creative things possible.

The first paragraph points out an important difference between "classic liberal" and some Libertarians. There was a little-noticed movement a few years ago to replace the Texas Constitution with one that almost completely abolished government; everything, including defense, police and courts was to be handled privately. I can only imagine the chaos.

The second paragraph is in stark contrast to what current liberals believe.

10 posted on 03/03/2004 9:40:14 AM PST by wysiwyg (What parts of "right of the people" and "shall not be infringed" do you not understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: robertpaulsen
Pathetic, as usual.
11 posted on 03/03/2004 9:48:41 AM PST by Protagoras (When they asked me what I thought of freedom in America,,, I said I thought it would be a good idea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson