Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hussein's Regime Skimmed Billions From Aid Program [major expose of UN Oil-for-Food program]
New York Times ^ | February 29, 2004 | SUSAN SACHS

Posted on 02/28/2004 11:55:01 AM PST by John Jorsett

AGHDAD, Iraq — In its final years in power, Saddam Hussein's government systematically extracted billions of dollars in kickbacks from companies doing business with Iraq, funneling most of the illicit funds through a network of foreign bank accounts in violation of United Nations sanctions.

Millions of Iraqis were struggling to survive on rations of food and medicine. Yet the government's hidden slush funds were being fed by suppliers and oil traders from around the world who sometimes lugged suitcases full of cash to ministry offices, said Iraqi officials who supervised the skimming operation.

The officials' accounts were enhanced by a trove of internal Iraqi government documents and financial records provided to The New York Times by members of the Iraqi Governing Council. Among the papers was secret correspondence from Mr. Hussein's top lieutenants setting up a formal mechanism to siphon cash from Iraq's business deals, an arrangement that went unnoticed by United Nations monitors.

Under a United Nations program begun in 1997, Iraq was permitted to sell its oil only to buy food and other humanitarian goods. The kickback order went out from Mr. Hussein's inner circle three years later, when limits on the amount of oil sales were lifted and Iraq's oil revenues reached $10 billion a year.

In an Aug. 3, 2000, letter marked "urgent and confidential," the Iraqi vice president, Taha Yassin Ramadan, informed government ministers that a high-command committee wanted "extra revenues" from the oil-for-food program. To that end, he wrote, all suppliers must be told to inflate their contracts "by the biggest percentage possible" and secretly transfer those amounts to Iraq's bank accounts in Jordan and the United Arab Emirates.

"Please acknowledge and certify that this is executed in an accurate and clear way, and under supervision of the specified minister," Mr. Ramadan wrote.

Iraq's sanctions-busting has long been an open secret. Two years ago, the General Accounting Office estimated that oil smuggling had generated nearly $900 million a year for Iraq. Oil companies had complained that Iraq was squeezing them for illegal surcharges, and Mr. Hussein's lavish spending on palaces and monuments provided more evidence of his access to unrestricted cash.

But the dimensions of the corruption have only lately become clear, from the newly available documents and from revelations by government officials who say they were too fearful to speak out before. They show the magnitude and organization of the payoff system, the complicity of the companies involved and the way Mr. Hussein bestowed contracts and gifts on those who praised him.

Yet his policy of awarding contracts to gain political support often meant that Iraq received shoddy, even useless, goods in return.

Perhaps the best measure of the corruption comes from a review of the $8.7 billion in outstanding oil for food contracts by the provisional Iraqi government with United Nations help. It found that 70 percent of the suppliers had inflated their prices and agreed to pay a 10 percent kickback, in cash or by transfer to accounts in Jordanian, Lebanese and Syrian banks.

[This is a very long article, so I've used the excerpt feature]

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2004election; aidandcomfort; axisofweasels; bigstory; dictatorship; duh; election2004; fools; iraq; oilforfood; peaceniks; saddam; saddamhussein; un; unfailure
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 02/28/2004 11:55:02 AM PST by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
HOLY CRAP!
The NY times is actually letting us ignorant plebians know about this? This is a huge change in policy for NY Times "the paper of Saddam"
2 posted on 02/28/2004 11:56:05 AM PST by Betaille (Seeing through moral relativism since 2002)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Betaille
Billions? John Fonda Kerry said he would have found trillions.
3 posted on 02/28/2004 12:00:00 PM PST by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
If we "follow the money", can we conclude that France, Germany & Russia were indirectly funding Islamic terrorists?

What was it that "W" said about those who fund Islamic terrorists?

4 posted on 02/28/2004 12:01:03 PM PST by TeleStraightShooter (Kerry plans to apply post-Vietnam policy to Iraq: Skedaddle & let the Syrian Baathists take over)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyal Buckeye
"Billions? John Fonda Kerry said he would have found trillions."

Of course he would... didn't you know that it was Bush's fault anyway? If you challenge my statement... you obviously hate vietnam war veterans. "What is it that Republicans who didn't serve in vietnam have against democrats who did?"
5 posted on 02/28/2004 12:07:34 PM PST by Betaille (Seeing through moral relativism since 2002)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TeleStraightShooter
"If we "follow the money", can we conclude that France, Germany & Russia were indirectly funding Islamic terrorists? What was it that "W" said about those who fund Islamic terrorists?"

Hmmmm, I wonder why we had such a hard time getting our "allies" to work with us to overthrow Sadaam. You hit the nail on the head - "follow the money."

6 posted on 02/28/2004 12:09:49 PM PST by hometoroost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Betaille
"HOLY CRAP! The NY times is actually letting us ignorant plebians know about this? This is a huge change in policy for NY Times "the paper of Saddam"

No, it's okay. It's Saturday. Nobody reads the NY Times on Saturday.

BTW, looks like those sanctions were working after all--at least for Saddam and his friends.
7 posted on 02/28/2004 12:15:10 PM PST by Hon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
Of course about 500,000 Iraq children starved to death because of Saddam. This would still be going on today had Bush not acted. It just makes you want to punch all those peaceniks who try to make it sound like the 600 American soldiers have died in vain.
8 posted on 02/28/2004 12:19:02 PM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
Hmm. I'm waiting for the other shoe to drop. The New York Times wouldn't bother with this story if there was no payoff at the end. Do you think Haliburton will turn up among those companies? Maybe a Haliburton subsidiary? No flames please, I'm just suspicious.
9 posted on 02/28/2004 12:26:49 PM PST by Arkie2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Betaille
Did John Fonda Kerry serve in the military? Gee, I would have never guessed.
10 posted on 02/28/2004 12:27:21 PM PST by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/898147/posts
Master list FR posted articles on UN Food for Oil program
GailA ^ | 4/22/03 | Various
11 posted on 02/28/2004 12:29:04 PM PST by backhoe (Has that Clinton "legacy" made you feel safer yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
"Of course about 500,000 Iraq children starved to death because of Saddam. This would still be going on today had Bush not acted."

You are clearly just trying to distract people from the loss of jobs during bush's presidency. Same with gay marriage. Americans don't care about Marriage, they care about Halliburton! They don't care about saving children and defending Americas national security, they care about Jobs. // End Sarchasm.
12 posted on 02/28/2004 12:35:10 PM PST by Betaille (Seeing through moral relativism since 2002)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Betaille
I am just glad Democrats don't attack Bush or bring up issues for political reasons or pander to their base.....
13 posted on 02/28/2004 12:39:44 PM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
FYI
14 posted on 02/28/2004 1:25:02 PM PST by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
Now, let's review: how long have we been reading and talking about this? A year? Ten months?

About time somebody over here picked it up!
15 posted on 02/28/2004 1:26:10 PM PST by Howlin (Just another unrepentant Bush supporter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: backhoe; MizSterious; William McKinley
funneling most of the illicit funds through a network of foreign bank accounts in violation of United Nations sanctions.

Notice is says "in violation of," but doesn't say "without the knowledge of."

16 posted on 02/28/2004 1:28:08 PM PST by Howlin (Just another unrepentant Bush supporter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Hon
Nope--this is a two column headline in upper right corner of page one of Sunday's Times. The big one--no liberal between Augusta, Maine and San Diego will miss this one.

Remember when they were whining how we were killing the Iraqi babies with our sanctions?

17 posted on 02/29/2004 3:24:46 AM PST by Pharmboy (History's greatest agent for freedom: The US Armed Forces)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
When the liberals talk about some conservatives (we know who) lacking intelligence, they totally miss who's really "slow." They might be ignorant, but they sure are dumb. They're just now (after all these months) catching up to what conservatives with even middle of the road intelligence have known all this time.
18 posted on 02/29/2004 8:30:04 AM PST by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: All
"....an arrangement that went unnoticed by United Nations monitors."

Go frickin figure.
19 posted on 02/29/2004 10:11:18 AM PST by BattleFlag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
Article was posted twice and unnecessarily excerpted both times? This is hugh!

Hussein's Regime Skimmed Billions From Aid Program
By SUSAN SACHS

Published: February 29, 2004


AGHDAD, Iraq — In its final years in power, Saddam Hussein's government systematically extracted billions of dollars in kickbacks from companies doing business with Iraq, funneling most of the illicit funds through a network of foreign bank accounts in violation of United Nations sanctions.

Millions of Iraqis were struggling to survive on rations of food and medicine. Yet the government's hidden slush funds were being fed by suppliers and oil traders from around the world who sometimes lugged suitcases full of cash to ministry offices, said Iraqi officials who supervised the skimming operation.

The officials' accounts were enhanced by a trove of internal Iraqi government documents and financial records provided to The New York Times by members of the Iraqi Governing Council. Among the papers was secret correspondence from Mr. Hussein's top lieutenants setting up a formal mechanism to siphon cash from Iraq's business deals, an arrangement that went unnoticed by United Nations monitors.

Under a United Nations program begun in 1997, Iraq was permitted to sell its oil only to buy food and other relief goods. The kickback order went out from Mr. Hussein's inner circle three years later, when limits on the amount of oil sales were lifted and Iraq's oil revenues reached $10 billion a year.

In an Aug. 3, 2000, letter marked "urgent and confidential," the Iraqi vice president, Taha Yassin Ramadan, informed government ministers that a high-command committee wanted "extra revenues" from the oil-for-food program. To that end, he wrote, all suppliers must be told to inflate their contracts "by the biggest percentage possible" and secretly transfer those amounts to Iraq's bank accounts in Jordan and the United Arab Emirates.

"Please acknowledge and certify that this is executed in an accurate and clear way, and under supervision of the specified minister," Mr. Ramadan wrote.

Iraq's sanctions-busting has long been an open secret. Two years ago, the General Accounting Office estimated that oil smuggling had generated nearly $900 million a year for Iraq. Oil companies had complained that Iraq was squeezing them for illegal surcharges, and Mr. Hussein's lavish spending on palaces and monuments provided more evidence of his access to unrestricted cash.

But the dimensions of the corruption have only lately become clear, from the newly available documents and from disclosures by government officials who say they were too fearful to speak out before. They show the magnitude and organization of the payoff system, the complicity of the companies involved and the way Mr. Hussein bestowed contracts and gifts on those who praised him.

Yet his policy of awarding contracts to gain political support often meant that Iraq received shoddy, even useless, goods in return.

Perhaps the best measure of the corruption comes from a review of the $8.7 billion in outstanding oil-for-food contracts by the provisional Iraqi government with United Nations help. It found that 70 percent of the suppliers had inflated their prices and agreed to pay a 10 percent kickback, in cash or by transfer to accounts in Jordanian, Lebanese and Syrian banks.

At that rate, Iraq would have collected as much as $2.3 billion of the $32.6 billion worth of contracts it signed since mid-2000, when the kickback system began. And some companies were willing to pay even more than the standard 10 percent, according to Trade and Oil Ministry employees.

Iraq's suppliers included Russian factories, Arab trade brokers, European manufacturers and state-owned companies from China and the Middle East. Iraq generally refused to buy directly from American companies, which in any case needed special licenses to trade legally with Iraq.

In one instance, the Coalition Provisional Authority, the American-led administrators in Iraq, found that Syria was prepared to kick back nearly 15 percent on its $57.5 million contract to sell wheat to Iraq. Syria has agreed to increase the amount of wheat to compensate for the inflated price, said an occupation official involved in the talks.
20 posted on 02/29/2004 12:45:19 PM PST by weegee (Election 2004: Re-elect President Bush... Don't feed the trolls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson