[jmstein7]

Amongst peeople who ALREADY hate Bush, yes.

However, amongst people who didn't ALREADY hate him, there is no "surge" in anger. But, that is what the media would like us to think.

[Bikers4Bush]

"However, amongst people who didn't ALREADY hate him, there is no "surge" in anger. But, that is what the media would like us to think."

You are free to believe that but it just isn't true.

[MHGinTN]

The media whores are seeking to turn up the rhetorical sleaze in order to sell more air time down the road for political ads. The media is pushing the election crap rather than reporting on it. CBS has been caught doing this in the past, so I doubt anyone will be able to connect the dots by now (the ghouls learn from their mistakes).

[cripplecreek]

I think you're closest to correct.

I have a lot of friends who are "former" Clinton/Gore voters. I had one of these friends tell me with tears in her eyes that " George Bush is better than any president we've had in a long time". Thats conviction.

[nobody_knows]

"Amongst peeople who ALREADY hate Bush, yes.

However, amongst people who didn't ALREADY hate him, there is no "surge" in anger. But, that is what the media would like us to think."

---

Exactly! A quick googleation of the names turned up this quote from Maria Yurasek from Washington state. I'm sure if I searched the other names, I could find similar quotes from the past of otheres quoted here. The press is lazy, and looking to stir the pot.

"Maria Yurasek, who attended a caucus at Spokane's Chase Middle School, said Dean "reminds me of an old boyfriend. He seems angry. I don't think Dean can beat Bush. I would vote for a dog if he could beat Bush. I would vote for Satan."