[MAKOTHEDOG]

she won't shut the hell up!

[Lady Eileen]

bump

[bankwalker]

Is she related to Newt?

[steve50]

How can they stop Sean from plugging his book long enough to have a debate?

[Lunatic Fringe]

Why do they always get that idiot Falwell to represent religious conservatives? think about it... CNN loves him.

[Always Right]

When two guys produce children from sticking their penis up each other rectum, I will understand their need for marriage....

[Lady Eileen]

What about the guy who said...why can't gay couples celebrate their love.

[clintonh8r]

I guess Hannity hasn't figured out that the more this stuff is discussed in the mainstream, the more acceptable it becomes to the general public. The mere act of accepting the premise of homosexual marriage as a legitimate subject of debate increases its legitimacy as part of the culture. But, hey....as long as it increases ratings and gives Sean a chance to flog his latest book....

[macamadamia]

Even if it is conceded that only consenting adults are relevant to the discussion, the gay/lesbian argument will ultimately lead to unintended and ironic consequences.

The gay/lesbian left argues that marriage, as it is today, unfairly imposes a morality, religious parameters...or boundaries. Ironically, they themselves MUST establish NEW boundaries or they will tacitly permit polygamy and incest. The problem for them is this: on what basis, if not morality, can they DENY polygamy and incest? They will be forced to draw an ethical/moral line, just like those they've thumbed their noses at...or, they will be forced to defend a host of acts that we know, instinctively, are repulsive.

[devane617]

I liked Falwells "Barnyard" comment.