Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: mabelkitty
As far as I know there is no "Bush" scandal. He answered all those questions four years ago. Was Gennifer Flowers replayed for the 96' election against Clinton in the media? I don't think so. This stuff is just infuriating.
2 posted on
02/14/2004 7:07:24 PM PST by
Burkeman1
("If you see ten troubles comin down the road, nine will run into the ditch before they reach you")
To: mabelkitty
Steyn's lucidity and plainspeak can hit you like you stepped in front of a runaway Greyhound bus. Which is generally why liberals hide in darkened doorways when they see him coming - the impact might make them question their own existence.
To: mabelkitty
I think I'll keep this tagline I gleaned from his last statement!
4 posted on
02/14/2004 7:08:27 PM PST by
MEG33
(John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
To: mabelkitty; blam
Marvelous !
5 posted on
02/14/2004 7:11:46 PM PST by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
To: mabelkitty
If character is the issue, Bush can relax. And, if doing your bit for national security is the issue, then John Kerry's been Awol for two decades. Gotta love it.
6 posted on
02/14/2004 7:13:38 PM PST by
SAMWolf
(Incontinence Hotline, please hold.)
To: mabelkitty
To: mabelkitty
Absolutely brilliant as usual. Bravo, Mr. Steyn !!!!!!
To: mabelkitty
I've been very critical of the President on some matters, important matters, but this whole issue of Bush's NG service is, as we all can see, is just a mass of a mean-spirited leftist press folderal intended to mortally wound President Bush.
It will not succeed.
10 posted on
02/14/2004 7:18:55 PM PST by
citizen
(Write-in Tom Tancredo President 2004!)
To: mabelkitty
There are two "scandals" in American politics at the moment: the first features George W Bush and whether he was a "deserter", as Michael Moore, Hollywood's celebrated Leftie lardbutt, puts it. The other scandal would be to determine if by John Kerry's own testimony before Congress (1971) and then later interview with Tim Russert (2001) if John Kerry LIED before Congress and trumped up the charges that led to American GIs being called "baby killers" (aiding and abetting the enemy) or did he tell the truth the first time when he confessed to in his own words violating the Geneva convention and committing warcrimes.
He is a self-confessed unindicted war criminal or else a traitor to his country in a time of war. Either charge would make John Kerry unfit to serve.
This is the scandal that broke shortly before the National Enquirer disclosed a John Kerry sex rumor. The Democrats won't lose many votes over sex. They would over the other charges (especially among veterans).
11 posted on
02/14/2004 7:22:53 PM PST by
weegee
(Election 2004: Re-elect President Bush... Don't feed the trolls.)
To: Pokey78
Ping!
12 posted on
02/14/2004 7:23:26 PM PST by
Rummyfan
To: mabelkitty
Actually, that is not strictly true. In the period when Bush was in the National Guard, Kerry was an angry Vietnam veteran protesting with Jane Fonda and accusing his comrades of being drug-addled rapists, torturers, mutilators and murderers committing war crimes on a scale surpassing the Japanese and the Nazis. But that's a mere detail. To the media, the contrast is simple: Kerry = war hero; Bush = something smaller, shiftier. Bill Clinton, of course, is smallest and shiftiest of the lot, but, back in '92, John Kerry stood shoulder to shoulder with his fellow Democrat and said, "We do not need to divide America over who served and how." Now, apparently, we do. So Kerry has his supporter Max Cleland, former Senator, fellow veteran and triple amputee, all over the talk-shows, explaining that the difference between giving Clinton a pass on draft-dodging and hammering relentlessly on Bush's National Guard record is that in 2004 "it's the national security, stupid. We want a President who can really be Commander-in-Chief". And the fact that Bush, as Commander-in-Chief, has liberated two countries, overthrown the Taliban and slung Saddam in jail counts for less than whether he bunked off for the weekend in 1972.
The Democrats are INSANE _ and I fear for the country if one is elected Presidetn.
13 posted on
02/14/2004 7:26:02 PM PST by
Rummyfan
To: mabelkitty
Excellent article.... Thank you Mark Steyn.....
To: mabelkitty
Bump for later.
17 posted on
02/14/2004 7:46:55 PM PST by
Angelwood
(FReepers are Everywhere! We Support Our Troops! (Hillary's Vast Rt Wg Conspiracy))
To: mabelkitty
Kerry is a pimple on the ass of a toilet tick!
18 posted on
02/14/2004 7:51:07 PM PST by
lawdude
(Liberalism: A failure every time it is tried!)
To: MJY1288
FYI
22 posted on
02/14/2004 7:57:34 PM PST by
MEG33
(John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
To: mabelkitty
Steyn in spot on, as usual.
Kerry's intern is homelier than Clinton's.
23 posted on
02/14/2004 7:59:37 PM PST by
Palladin
(Proud to be a FReeper!)
To: mabelkitty
"John Kerry's been Awol for two decades."
What a pity this isn't true! Just think what we wouldn't have missed if he had been absent?
34 posted on
02/14/2004 9:04:02 PM PST by
GladesGuru
(In a society predicated upon liberty, it is essential to examine principles - -)
To: Temple Owl
great column
42 posted on
02/14/2004 9:39:32 PM PST by
Tribune7
(Vote Toomey April 27)
To: mabelkitty
More crystal clarity from Mark Steyn. Brilliant!
44 posted on
02/14/2004 10:18:00 PM PST by
NonValueAdded
("America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our people." GWB 1/20/04)
To: mabelkitty
PURE GENIUS. As usual. I am in love with Steyn's brain.
49 posted on
02/14/2004 10:40:16 PM PST by
Yaelle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson