Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gender Blender: Adolescent Girls and 'Heteroflexibility'
BreakPoint ^ | Feb. 9, 2004 | Charles Colson

Posted on 02/09/2004 12:27:36 PM PST by DemWatch

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
To: mikegi
Back in my day even the sluts would have kicked your a$$ 6 ways to Sunday if you ever even entertained the idea of making it with another girl.

I just don't get the attraction guys have for girl-on-girl stuff. Trust me, women do NOT have the similar fantasies about guys.
41 posted on 02/09/2004 4:06:00 PM PST by gracie1 (Where are we going and why are we in this handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: fr_freak
The promotion of sex as simply a recreational act damages the importance of its role in marriage and family. This includes irresponsible heterosexual behavior as well. Sexual intimacy is a large part of the bond between a husband and wife, and is greatly diminished if each has become accustomed to sex as a casual activity. Homosexuality goes even farther in that it destroys the very foundation of marriage - that it is a union of a man and a woman.

Bump for the truth.

42 posted on 02/09/2004 4:11:31 PM PST by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: gracie1
I just don't get the attraction guys have for girl-on-girl stuff. Trust me, women do NOT have the similar fantasies about guys.

I'm not quite sure of the reason for the attraction either even though I suffer from it to some degree. Of course, I'm not talking about combat boot wearing, crewcut dykes. They would turn my stomach as much as two guys would.

43 posted on 02/09/2004 4:27:05 PM PST by mikegi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: DemWatch
What's the old expression for Vassar girls? "Lesbian Until Graduation." And for Bryn Mawr: "Lesbian For Life."

This is a juvenile experiment most girls will live to be embarrassed about. But a handful will not have the good sense to be ashamed.

44 posted on 02/09/2004 4:30:23 PM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdReform; Clemenza; Paleo Conservative
The New York city PRIVATE schools are going to hell.
I went to three of them. I spent 3 years in Ramaz, a Modern-Orthodox Jewish school No problem their, although many students are less than Orthodox during their free time in high school. (Pot... what's pot?! I thought these were roll-it yourself menthols. Alcohol? We are praciticing the use of ceremonial wine with been and liquor!)
I then went to Buckley, an all boys school which goes k-9th. As far as I know, there was never anything going on, although I do remember two gay teachers. (1 art, 1 Latin)
For high school, I went to Collegiate. At my time no one came out the closet until May of their senior year. They didn't dare to do so earlier. The closest thing to a shared sexual experience was trading pornmagazines and putting up SI Calendars in the student center. However, thngs have gone downhill in the last 8 years. There is a new "socially liberal" (check this guys hard drive for kiddie porn!) heandmaster. There is now a special advisor for homosexual students. So falleth the oldest school in America.
The sister schools were always far more liberal. Brearly girls were always thought of as lesbian. (And I don't mean lipstick lezzies either, in some cases!)
45 posted on 02/09/2004 4:31:34 PM PST by rmlew (Peaceniks and isolationists are objectively pro-Terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: IronJack
The boys at Vassar are more likely to be gay than the girls (Same is true for Sarah Lawrence.)
According to friends who went their, 1/2 of the guys and 1/3 of the girls were homosexual. Considering a 2 to 1 ration, this left 2.5 straight women per straight man.
If you can't get laid with those odds...
46 posted on 02/09/2004 4:37:37 PM PST by rmlew (Peaceniks and isolationists are objectively pro-Terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: gracie1
I just don't get the attraction guys have for girl-on-girl stuff.

Yeah, I can see how women could find this confusing. Most guys can't explain it -- it's just there. In our defense, I'm not sure women are very good about articulating why certain things can get them "worked up" either. It's not the sort of topic that lends itself to words I guess.

47 posted on 02/09/2004 4:39:51 PM PST by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: gracie1
I just don't get the attraction guys have for girl-on-girl stuff. Trust me, women do NOT have the similar fantasies about guys.

It's not to tuff to figure. Young men want to see nudity. They don't care what they're doing.

48 posted on 02/09/2004 4:42:44 PM PST by fritzz (Idiot of Idiots, to trust what is written - Plautus - Romans must have had their own NY Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
Name the #1 male fantasy.

Just because something attracts us that does not mean it is moral or should be celebrated. Remember that every female is a daughter, sister, or future wife. Then maybe you can stop with those evil thoughts. What if it was your daughter, sister, mother, or wife that was being degraded by a "fantasy"?

49 posted on 02/09/2004 4:42:45 PM PST by mrfixit514
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: EdReform; *Homosexual Agenda

50 posted on 02/09/2004 4:56:50 PM PST by MeekOneGOP (Check out this HILARIOUS story !! haha!: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1060580/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DemWatch
As one Brown University female said, “I like women only right now, but who knows where I’ll be in 25 years?”

Childless, alone, and wondering how on earth she missed her chance at landing a nice guy...

51 posted on 02/09/2004 5:12:55 PM PST by Rytwyng
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam
The courts have agreed that students can not grade one another's papers because of privacy issues. Sexuality, however, can be exposed in an open assembly.

OK...I think I understand.
52 posted on 02/09/2004 5:13:17 PM PST by sharktrager (The last rebel without a cause in a world full of causes without a rebel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: nevergiveup
As one Brown University female said, “I like women only right now, but who knows where I’ll be in 25 years?”

Iowa?

53 posted on 02/09/2004 5:14:32 PM PST by sharktrager (The last rebel without a cause in a world full of causes without a rebel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
I went to a Carmelite High School in Florida (thanks for uprooting me to Flori-duh dad!), where you could get any drug you wanted and the boys and girls had there way with eachother, though at least off school grounds.

Nevertheless, the contrast between my high school, where most were focused on learning and my sisters public high school, where you needed to get into honors classes otherwise you would be screwed educationally (and sharing the classroom with the South Florida chapter of the Bloods & Crips). This BTW, was in Boca Raton, aka Scarsdale South, one of the wealthiest towns in the state.

54 posted on 02/09/2004 6:48:29 PM PST by Clemenza (East side, West side, all around the town. Tripping the light fantastic on the sidewalks of New York)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: fr_freak; little jeremiah; scripter; ArGee; lentulusgracchus; Bryan; GrandMoM; Brad's Gramma; ...
Bumping an excellent reply
55 posted on 02/09/2004 7:07:31 PM PST by EdReform (Free Republic - Now more than ever! Thank you for your support!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
BTTT
56 posted on 02/09/2004 7:33:16 PM PST by EdReform (Free Republic - Now more than ever! Thank you for your support!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *Homosexual Agenda; EdReform; scripter; GrandMoM; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping. There are some great comments, check out #38.

Let me know if anyone wants to be added to or subtracted from this ping list. Warning: very busy lately.
57 posted on 02/09/2004 7:38:46 PM PST by little jeremiah (everyone is entitled to their opinion, but everyone isn't entitled to be right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: valkyrieanne
Gay men and women are different.

Yes, their behavior is different. And yes, their backgrounds are often different - broken homes, poor bonding or relationships with one or both parents. And yes, more often molested or seduced as children or adolescents.

IMO, homosexuality in men is largely genetic (made worse by social factors like poor upbringing.)

Your opinion is not backed up by science or research. Even pro-homosexual researchers have admitted they haven't found a "gay" gene or any evidence that such exists.

58 posted on 02/09/2004 7:48:45 PM PST by little jeremiah (everyone is entitled to their opinion, but everyone isn't entitled to be right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
. Gay men often argue that their homosexuality is genetic (am I basically believe them).

You may believe them, and they may believe it, but homosexual researchers have been unable to find any evidence that homosexual attraction is genetic or inborn. The fact that there are thousands who are ex-gay is further evidence that same sex attraction is a disorder, with various causes including poor relationships with one or bother parents (or absent parent), and molestation or seduction when young.

59 posted on 02/09/2004 7:53:18 PM PST by little jeremiah (everyone is entitled to their opinion, but everyone isn't entitled to be right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
I remember the days when "the boys at Vassar" were all women. And no man with an ounce of testosterone in his body would do more than visit Sarah Lawrence.
60 posted on 02/09/2004 8:16:48 PM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson