[VRWC_minion]

One could argue that the serpent in Genesis is not a snake but rather a representation of evil but this article and scripture don't contradict a literal reading.

[Southflanknorthpawsis]

One could argue that the serpent in Genesis is not a snake but rather a representation of evil

One could argue, but one would be wrong. When stated clearly as literal in the Bible, we are to interpret literally, as in the case of the serpent's curse.

[ZULU]

Yeah, they do contradict a literal interpretation. Snakes evolved long before modern man appeared in the fossil record. That's a fact.

Therefore, ther reference was symbolical, allegorical and teleological, not scientific.

The "serpent" in the Garden of Eden was Satan, not a reptile. The same passage in Genesis states that Satan assumed the shape of the serpent.