Skip to comments.
Scientists Discover Where Snakes Lived When They Evolved into Limbless Creatures
Penn State ^
| 30 January 2004
| press release
Posted on 02/03/2004 2:37:14 PM PST by AdmSmith
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-333 next last
To: VRWC_minion
You might enjoy
this.
Scroll down to the Eleven Principles of the Literal Method of Interpreting Scripture.
To: PatrickHenry
Ping
To: cyborg
To: *crevo_list; VadeRetro; jennyp; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Physicist; LogicWings; ...
PING. [This ping list is for the evolution side of evolution threads, and sometimes for other science topics. FReepmail me to be added or dropped.]
To: AdmSmith
"A snake for your collection."
The collection is held by the liberals. apologies to snakes love snakes , tasty but they give me gas.
(Tilt at windmills if you must but there are times they fall on you. Sancho tell the valet to bring the burro around.)
45
posted on
02/03/2004 5:24:22 PM PST
by
dozer7
To: AdmSmith
I'm wondering...did they manage to get any genes from sneaky snake?
To: VRWC_minion
Actually, the serpent referred to in the bible is a Dragon, not a snake. The snake reference is not supported by scripture but the dragon reference is found in Sumerian cuneiform writings of 3000 BCE. The dragon is a reference to Enkei, a "god", not a talking animal.
47
posted on
02/03/2004 7:33:33 PM PST
by
IncredibleHulk
(For some, it is better to rule in Hell, than to serve in Heaven.)
To: IncredibleHulk
I don't know about the Hebrew text, but in the Greek Septuagint translation of Genesis 3.1-15 it uses the word ophis which is the regular Greek word for serpent or snake. (The name of the constellation Ophiuchus means "serpent holder.")
To: PatrickHenry
Thanks for the ping!
To: protest1
You must be joking!
If that is correct then man is as well a dust-eater. The corresponding organ in human to the Jacobson's organ is the Vomeronasal Organ:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10744216&dopt=Abstract The vomeronasal organ is a chemoreceptive structure located at the base of the nasal septum with direct axonal connections to the accessory olfactory bulb in many terrestrial vertebrates. Pheromones presumably bind to the vomeronasal organ and exert behavioral or physiologic responses, thereby allowing chemical communication between animals of the same species. The presence and function of the vomeronasal organ in humans is debated. A phenotypic classification schema for the human vomeronasal organ is described and applied to 253 human subjects who underwent nasal examination. Of these subjects, only 6 percent possessed a vomeronasal organ with 64 percent unilateral and 36 percent bilateral in appearance. No difference existed in gender, age, or race between those subjects with or without a vomeronasal organ. There is no evidence supporting involutional senescence of this structure. Future investigations should use this phenotypic schema for the vomeronasal organ to allow accurate comparisons of study populations.
50
posted on
02/03/2004 10:39:05 PM PST
by
AdmSmith
To: AdmSmith
No, I am not joking. What, in your post, would lead you to that conclusion?
Snakes crawl on their belly and do eat dust. Your post, while interesting, is irrelevant.
Do we crawl around on our belly licking dust? No I think not.
51
posted on
02/04/2004 1:33:27 AM PST
by
protest1
To: protest1
Ask any herpetologist and they will confirm that snakes do not eat dust.
You may as well ask any pediatrist and they will confirm that most small babies do "crawl around on their belly licking dust"
52
posted on
02/04/2004 2:44:57 AM PST
by
AdmSmith
To: Southflanknorthpawsis
I agree with it all. However, it still leaves room to appreciate a passage on two levels. It need not be an either/or approach. Heck, even the names God chose for people were dual purpose. They forshadowed the charachter and they were their name.
We often get too tied up in the literal and we underestimate God's ability of expression in his scripture. What a masterfull God we have that can express both literal meanings for the child listening and metaphors for the adult listening.
53
posted on
02/04/2004 6:04:54 AM PST
by
VRWC_minion
(Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
To: AdmSmith
Scientists Discover Where Snakes Lived When They Evolved into Limbless Creatures Not, one presumes, in Georgia.
54
posted on
02/04/2004 6:05:33 AM PST
by
steve-b
To: IncredibleHulk
Actually, the serpent referred to in the bible is a Dragon, not a snake. Of course he wasn't a snake until God changed him.
The snake reference is not supported by scripture but the dragon reference is found in Sumerian cuneiform writings of 3000 BCE. The dragon is a reference to Enkei, a "god", not a talking animal.
How do you know that both stories don't have a common source and that one of them or both of them might be corrupt versions ?
55
posted on
02/04/2004 6:06:45 AM PST
by
VRWC_minion
(Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
To: AdmSmith
If that is correct then man is as well a dust-eaterReal men never wash their food, only snakes do.
56
posted on
02/04/2004 6:08:01 AM PST
by
VRWC_minion
(Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
To: AdmSmith
Now, the first study ever to analyze genes from all the living families of lizards has revealed that snakes made their debut on the land, not in the ocean.Hell, we've known this for years on FR. Hillary spends most of her time on dry land.
57
posted on
02/04/2004 6:08:24 AM PST
by
rintense
To: VRWC_minion
A PERFECT example of Biblicial literalists extracting a passage from Genesis as though it explains Biological facts.
A lot of the pagan cultures around Palestine worshipped snakes. Some snakes are venomous.
Human beings are primates. Primates have no INHERENT fear of snakes. HOWEVER, primates form a portion of the diet of large tropical snakes and are exposed to venomous tropical snakes. Hence, primates have been shown in behavioral tests, to have an innate capacity to DEVELOP a fear of snakes.
This passage represents more of an attmept to teleogically
explain why snakes crawl on the ground and why they are limbless and why the Jews hated them. The real reference in the Bible is to Satan, not to members of the Order Squamata. Having worked with snakes for many years, I can assure you, there is absolutelyu NOTHING Satanic about the animal. They are actually beautiful and quite interesting.
58
posted on
02/04/2004 6:15:16 AM PST
by
ZULU
(GOD BLESS SENATOR JOE MCCARTHY!!!)
To: ClearCase_guy
Snakes and lizards are VERY closely related. They are connected EVOLUTIONARILY as this study indicates.
There are limbless burrowing lizards and their are snakes like boas which have tiny, rudimentary limbs called "spurs" located at the rear of the body. Both snakes and lizards have scales - a feature absent in Crocodilians and Turtles.
Burrowing snakes and limbless lizards have many simialr behavioral patterns and ecological requirements. Osteologically, snakes and lizards are very similar.
59
posted on
02/04/2004 6:18:23 AM PST
by
ZULU
(GOD BLESS SENATOR JOE MCCARTHY!!!)
To: Southflanknorthpawsis
"14 And the LORD God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life:"
See my posting on the ridiculous interpretation of this passage. It is a symbolical referal to SATAN, NOT to snakes the animal.
And snakes DON'T EAT DUST. They eat small mammals, other reptiles, fish, insects, birds, and insects and sometimes eggs.
TRUST ME, I have had numerous snakes as pets and worked with them professionally. I'm a Christian and see no conflict with that and the Bible.
And every snake DOESN'T have "two spots on their belly where their legs once were". Some large constrictors have very tiny rudimentary rear limbs called "spurs" located next to the anal opening. They are remnants of legs. They evolved from lizards and this has NOTHING to do with any Biblical "curses". This evolutionary event occurred LONG BEFORE nay Modern man appeared in the fossil records.
60
posted on
02/04/2004 6:24:07 AM PST
by
ZULU
(GOD BLESS SENATOR JOE MCCARTHY!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-333 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson