To: Huck
124 posted on
02/03/2004 10:51:52 AM PST by
prairiebreeze
(WMD's in Iraq -- The absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.)
To: prairiebreeze
Without looking at the links (thanks, but I have to get back to my damned job in a minute), I can say that I understand that our policy was regime change. And I understand we can say that Saddam was trying to acquire WMD. I guess you can say that's argument enough for invasion, overthrow and occupation. Maybe it is. But the two reasons most ballyhooed were 1)Stockpiles of WMD and later, after that one started looking grim, 2)Liberation of Iraqis. I am saying that reason 1 wasn't true and reason 2 is not a sufficient reason to go to war. Now the GOP position is that we made the best decisions possible with bad info. Not good.
128 posted on
02/03/2004 10:56:54 AM PST by
Huck
(I was gonna write an opus, but we'll just have to wait and see...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson