Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: longtermmemmory; HAL9000
"Flaw in this article. You do not have to be a lawyer to sit on the supreme court."

True enough, but that mistake (a common misconception, btw), only provides more support to the thesis.
20 posted on 02/02/2004 3:09:02 PM PST by proud American in Canada (Take back the First Amendment! Call today! U.S. Capitol Switchboard (202) 224-3121)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: proud American in Canada
My article never stated that being a lawyer was a Constitutional requirement for confirmation to the Supreme Court.

But the political reality is that a lawyer who was impeached, had his law license suspended and resigned from the bar of the Supreme Court will never be nominated as a Supreme Court justice. Those are Bill's problems, not Hillary's.

22 posted on 02/02/2004 3:29:16 PM PST by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson