To: longtermmemmory; HAL9000
"Flaw in this article. You do not have to be a lawyer to sit on the supreme court."
True enough, but that mistake (a common misconception, btw), only provides more support to the thesis.
20 posted on
02/02/2004 3:09:02 PM PST by
proud American in Canada
(Take back the First Amendment! Call today! U.S. Capitol Switchboard (202) 224-3121)
To: proud American in Canada
My article never stated that being a lawyer was a Constitutional requirement for confirmation to the Supreme Court.
But the political reality is that a lawyer who was impeached, had his law license suspended and resigned from the bar of the Supreme Court will never be nominated as a Supreme Court justice. Those are Bill's problems, not Hillary's.
22 posted on
02/02/2004 3:29:16 PM PST by
HAL9000
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson