Skip to comments.
Statement regarding the Super Bowl halftime show
www.superbowl.com ^
| February 1, 2004
| NFL
Posted on 02/01/2004 7:20:07 PM PST by Lawgvr1955
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 461-468 next last
To: Enterprise
>> Well, after all, MTV stands for "My T.tties and Vagina."
These days they seem to have the T and V mixed up - the can quite figure out who is supposed to touch what. Goes doubly for queer guys.
To: Humidston
If you're serious, go to a t*tt* bar where you can see all you want for as long as you want! Just go to the beach and get a nice tan while you're at it.
To: smith288
Now its Porky's Halftime.Excellent observation!!
123
posted on
02/01/2004 8:05:07 PM PST
by
Lawgvr1955
(Sic Semper Tyrannus)
To: Julliardsux
...lot's of us have boobs, so it's just silly. And anyway, Nelly was not really making obscene gestures from his crotch - he just had his hand there, as I have my hand on mine now.
Gee, you must have had it tough in high school gym class.
124
posted on
02/01/2004 8:05:15 PM PST
by
raybbr
(My 1.4 cents - It used to be 2 cents, but after taxes - you get the idea.)
To: Lawgvr1955
Let me make up my own mind. Does anyone have a pic of that tit? How did I miss it?
125
posted on
02/01/2004 8:05:25 PM PST
by
Revolting cat!
("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
To: NormsRevenge
sounds like the show was a flop
126
posted on
02/01/2004 8:05:33 PM PST
by
breakem
To: raybbr
I did like climbing the rope...
To: Prodigal Son
LOL, didn't you come into contact with a female breast as a child? I don't see a female breast as being that unusual. Certainly not something that is ugly. It's a functional part of your anatomy- like your arm for example. You didn't answer my question.
Trying to redefine a society's definition of sexual content? Tell you what, when they start putting mammies in the newest edition of Highlights Magazine for kids, ill take whatever you say seriously.
An arm isnt considered a sexual stimulating part of the body. Breasts are. Grow up.
128
posted on
02/01/2004 8:05:53 PM PST
by
smith288
(If terrorist hate George W. Bush, then he has my vote!)
To: Lawgvr1955
Bettah than this?
129
posted on
02/01/2004 8:05:54 PM PST
by
Revolting cat!
("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
To: Revolting cat!
Drudge does.
130
posted on
02/01/2004 8:06:06 PM PST
by
Howlin
(If we don't post, will they exist?)
To: Lawgvr1955
I suppose it would have been out of the question to have Norah Jones or Diana Krall or Dianne Reeves or someone who can actually carry a tune and enunciate her words as the halftime act.
To: Prodigal Son
Well, to start with, I don't own a television. But to continue, nudity is common on television where I live. But graphic violence is not. I don't think there is anything ugly about a woman's breasts- if that's what you're asking.It's not a question on whether woman's breasts are ugly -- it's a question about whether it's appropriate to have a naked breast on American broadcast TV when families are watching the game with their kids. Again, this wasn't the Spice Channel here -- this was the Super Bowl, an event that ostensibly the whole family can watch together. There was certainly no warning given that there was going to be this nudity, either.
As for the rest of your argument, I'll bet Janet Jackson defecates on a regular basis, too, but I don't particularly want to see her do that on TV either.
To: Revolting cat!
I am udderly disgusted!
To: mewzilla
How were you exposed? At your mom's breast, or did your folks take you to topless clubs? There is a difference... Exposed? You make the human body sound so ugly. I've never seen it that way.
To: Revolting cat!
Did you just take that picture?
To: Revolting cat!
Drudge
136
posted on
02/01/2004 8:07:43 PM PST
by
dawn53
To: Prodigal Son
LOL, didn't you come into contact with a female breast as a child? I don't see a female breast as being that unusual. Certainly not something that is ugly. It's a functional part of your anatomy- like your arm for example. Sounds like you may have been the victim of some incestual contact. If so, I offer my sympathy, but you need to put your anger for Almighty God on a shorter leash. And you might want to stop feeding that puppy so often. Just a word of warning from a fellow traveler.
137
posted on
02/01/2004 8:08:32 PM PST
by
O.C. - Old Cracker
(When the cracker gets old, you wind up with Old Cracker. - O.C.)
To: smith288
The arm used to be considered so.
To: breakem
This was a major "moment of truth" time for CBS, MTV, NFl, people are extremely po'd about this and from what I see are not going to let this slide. Watch for the s**t to hit the fan tomorrow.
To: NYCVirago
It's not a question on whether woman's breasts are ugly -- it's a question about whether it's appropriate to have a naked breast on American broadcast TV Would it be appropriate to see a naked male chest? What's the difference? I know I've seen bare chested men at football games.
It's a double standard. If anything, the naked female chest is much less offending than the naked overweight torso of some hairy football fan.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 461-468 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson